Cited by 308Genetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Somatic POLE proofreading domain mutation, immune response, and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study

Open access

Abstract

Background Precision cancer medicine depends on defining distinct tumour subgroups using biomarkers that may occur at very modest frequencies. One such subgroup comprises patients with exceptionally mutated (ultramutated) cancers caused by mutations that impair DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) proofreading.Methods We examined the association of POLE proofreading domain mutation with clinicopathological variables and immune response in colorectal cancers from clinical trials (VICTOR, QUASAR2, and PETACC-3) and colorectal cancer cohorts (Leiden University Medical Centre 1 and 2, Oslo 1 and 2, Bern, AMC-AJCC-II, and Epicolon-1). We subsequently investigated its association with prognosis in stage II/III colorectal cancer by Cox regression of pooled individual patient data from more than 4500 cases from these studies.Findings Pathogenic somatic POLE mutations were detected in 66 (1·0%) of 6517 colorectal cancers, and were mutually exclusive with mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) in the 6277 cases for whom both markers were determined (none of 66 vs 833 [13·4%] of 6211; p<0·0001). Compared with cases with wild-type POLE, cases with POLE mutations were younger at diagnosis (median 54·5 years vs 67·2 years; p<0·0001), were more frequently male (50 [75·8%] of 66 vs 3577 [55·5%] of 6445; p=0·0010), more frequently had right-sided tumour location (44 [68·8%] of 64 vs 2463 [39·8%] of 6193; p<0·0001), and were diagnosed at an earlier disease stage (p=0·006, χ 2 test for trend). Compared with mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) POLE wild-type tumours, POLE-mutant colorectal cancers displayed increased CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration and expression of cytotoxic T-cell markers and effector cytokines, similar in extent to that observed in immunogenic MMR-D cancers. Both POLE mutation and MMR-D were associated with significantly reduced risk of recurrence compared with MMR-P colorectal cancers in multivariable analysis (HR 0·34 [95% CI 0·11-0·76]; p=0·0060 and 0·72 [0·60-0·87]; p=0·00035), although the difference between the groups was not significant.Interpretation POLE proofreading domain mutations identify a subset of immunogenic colorectal cancers with excellent prognosis. This association underscores the importance of rare biomarkers in precision cancer medicine, but also raises important questions about how to identify and implement them in practice.Funding Cancer Research UK, Academy of Medical Sciences, Health Foundation, EU, ERC, NIHR, Wellcome Trust, Dutch Cancer Society, Dutch Digestive Foundation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-1253(16)30014-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • POLE-mutated tumors are characterized by infiltration of CD8+ T cells at higher rates, greater expression of cytotoxic markers, and upregulation of immune checkpoints in contrast to POLE wild-type pMMR/MSS tumors.

    “POLE-mutated tumors are characterized by certain elements such as infiltration of CD8+ T cells at higher rates, greater expression of cytotoxic markers, and upregulation of immune checkpoints in contrast to POLE wild-type pMMR/MSS tumors.”
  • pMMR/MSS tumors bearing POLE- or POLD1-mutations are often diagnosed at earlier stages and exhibit favorable prognoses compared to cases with wild-type POLE or POLD1.

    “Previous work on this topic has shown that pMMR/MSS tumors baring POLE- or POLD1-mutations are often diagnosed at earlier stages and exhibit favorable prognoses compared to cases with wild-type POLE or POLD1 [167].”
  • POLE-mutated tumors demonstrate a similar enrichment of CD8+ T cells as observed in tumors with dMMR/MSI-H phenotypes, suggesting a similar underlying biology between these two subgroups of CRC tumors.

    “Additionally, they demonstrate a similar enrichment of CD8+ T cells as observed in tumors with dMMR/MSI-H phenotypes, suggesting a similar underlying biology between these two subgroups of CRC tumors [167].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 308

Metadata

Authors
Domingo, E., Freeman-Mills, L., Rayner, E., Glaire, M., Briggs, S., Vermeulen, L., Fessler, E., Medema, J. P., Boot, A., Morreau, H., van Wezel, T., Liefers, G.-J., Lothe, R. A., Danielsen, S. A., Sveen, A., Nesbakken, A., Zlobec, I., Lugli, A., Koelzer, V. H., Berger, M. D., Castellví-Bel, S., Muñoz, J., de Bruyn, M., Nijman, H. W., Novelli, M., Lawson, K., Oukrif, D., Frangou, E., Dutton, P., Tejpar, S., Delorenzi, M., Kerr, R., Kerr, D., Tomlinson, I., & Church, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (ES)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University College London (GB)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • Churchill Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Church, David N
Venue
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
207-216
ISSN
  • 2468-1156 (ISSN-L)
  • 2468-1253
OpenAlex
W2488353409
Cited by
308
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (16459, 16895)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2010-13-007, NIHR-INF-0088)
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-CSF4-Church)
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
colorectal cancer, DNA polymerase epsilon, mismatch repair deficiency, antitumor immunity, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, prognostic factors, recurrence risk, stage II and III colorectal cancer, right-sided tumors, clinicopathological features
MeSH terms
Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, DNA Polymerase II, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review