Cited by 6Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Computer-aided detection in real-world colonoscopy: enhancing detection or offering false hope?

Misawa, Masashi, Kudo, Shin-ei, Mori, Yuichi·2023·The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00166-8

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Misawa, M., Kudo, S.-E., & Mori, Y.
Affiliations
  • SHOWA Medical University Northern Yokohama Hospital (JP)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Misawa, Masashi
Venue
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
687-688
ISSN
  • 2468-1156 (ISSN-L)
  • 2468-1253
OpenAlex
W4379014262
Cited by
6
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23K24615)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
computer-aided detection, colonoscopy, colorectal cancer screening, adenoma detection rate, colorectal neoplasia, missed lesions, interval colorectal cancer, quality indicators
MeSH terms
Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Computers, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review