Cited by 153Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management

Inequalities in life expectancy in six large Latin American cities from the SALURBAL study: an ecological analysis

Open access
Bilal, Usama, Alazraqui, Marcio, Caiaffa, Waleska T, Lopez-Olmedo, Nancy, Martinez-Folgar, Kevin, Miranda, J Jaime, Rodriguez, Daniel A, Vives, Alejandra +1 more·2019·The Lancet Planetary Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Latin America is one of the most unequal regions in the world, but evidence is lacking on the magnitude of health inequalities in urban areas of the region. Our objective was to examine inequalities in life expectancy in six large Latin American cities and its association with a measure of area-level socioeconomic status. METHODS: In this ecological analysis, we used data from the Salud Urbana en America Latina (SALURBAL) study on six large cities in Latin America (Buenos Aires, Argentina; Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Santiago, Chile; San José, Costa Rica; Mexico City, Mexico; and Panama City, Panama), comprising 266 subcity units, for the period 2011-15 (expect for Panama city, which was for 2012-16). We calculated average life expectancy at birth by sex and subcity unit with life tables using age-specific mortality rates estimated from a Bayesian model, and calculated the difference between the ninth and first decile of life expectancy at birth (P90-P10 gap) across subcity units in cities. We also analysed the association between life expectancy at birth and socioeconomic status at the subcity-unit level, using education as a proxy for socioeconomic status, and whether any geographical patterns existed in cities between subcity units. FINDINGS: We found large spatial differences in average life expectancy at birth in Latin American cities, with the largest P90-P10 gaps observed in Panama City (15·0 years for men and 14·7 years for women), Santiago (8·9 years for men and 17·7 years for women), and Mexico City (10·9 years for men and 9·4 years for women), and the narrowest in Buenos Aires (4·4 years for men and 5·8 years for women), Belo Horizonte (4·0 years for men and 6·5 years for women), and San José (3·9 years for men and 3·0 years for women). Higher area-level socioeconomic status was associated with higher life expectancy, especially in Santiago (change in life expectancy per P90-P10 change unit-level of educational attainment 8·0 years [95% CI 5·8-10·3] for men and 11·8 years [7·1-16·4] for women) and Panama City (7·3 years [2·6-12·1] for men and 9·0 years [2·4-15·5] for women). We saw an increase in life expectancy at birth from east to west in Panama City and from north to south in core Mexico City, and a core-periphery divide in Buenos Aires and Santiago. Whereas for San José the central part of the city had the lowest life expectancy and in Belo Horizonte the central part of the city had the highest life expectancy. INTERPRETATION: Large spatial differences in life expectancy in Latin American cities and their association with social factors highlight the importance of area-based approaches and policies that address social inequalities in improving health in cities of the region. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2542-5196(19)30235-9

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wide disparities in socioeconomic status and segregation into wealthy and poor sub-city units mean that cities contain a microcosm of social gradients and inequities in health present in the rest of the country.

    “Although urban areas are generally wealthier than rural areas, wide disparities in socioeconomic status (SES) and segregation into wealthy and poor sub-city units mean that cities contain a microcosm of social gradients – and inequities in health – present in the rest of the country [7–9].”

    From Social epidemiology of urban COVID-19 inequalities in Latin America and Canada (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction describes social and health inequalities in Latin America, and the Discussion reports life-expectancy gaps associated with subcity socioeconomic status and spatial segregation in six cities (pages not provided). The paper does not establish that those cities reproduce the gradients found in the rest of their countries, or compare urban and rural wealth. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The lack of association between IFR and SES in the oldest age group can be attributed to lower life expectancy and elderly people being healthier enough to survive until that age.

    “The lack of association between IFR and SES in the oldest age group can be attributed to a lower life expectancy (23), which is factored into the estimation of SES (see methods for details), and the fact that elderly people might be, in general, healthier enough to survive until that age.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Atkinson AB Bourguignon F Handbook of income distribution 1st edn volume 1 2000 Elsevier Amsterdam

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bilal, U., Alazraqui, M., Caiaffa, W. T., Lopez-Olmedo, N., Martinez-Folgar, K., Miranda, J. J., Rodriguez, D. A., Vives, A., & Diez-Roux, A. V.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Universidad Nacional de Lanús (AR)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Bilal, Usama
Venue
The Lancet Planetary Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
3
Issue
12
Pages
e503-e510
ISSN
2542-5196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994707839
Cited by
153
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
18.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-01-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Planetary Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP5OD26429)
  • Wellcome Trust (205177/Z/16/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Keywords
life expectancy, health disparities, urban health, area-level socioeconomic status, educational attainment, regional variation in mortality, Latin American cities, sex differences in longevity, life tables, Panama City, Santiago, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Belo Horizonte
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Argentina, Brazil, Child, Child, Preschool, Chile, Cities, Costa Rica, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Life Expectancy, Male, Mexico, Middle Aged, Panama, Socioeconomic Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review