CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 263Sustainable Development and Environmental PolicySustainable Development and Environmental ManagementSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 178 of the 182 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries

Open access
Kallis, Giorgos, Hickel, Jason, O’Neill, Daniel W, Jackson, Tim, Victor, Peter A, Raworth, Kate, Schor, Juliet B, Steinberger, Julia K, Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana·2025·The Lancet Planetary Health
DOI 10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There are increasing concerns that continued economic growth in high-income countries might not be environmentally sustainable, socially beneficial, or economically achievable. In this Review, we explore the rapidly advancing field of post-growth research, which has evolved in response to these concerns. The central idea of post-growth is to replace the goal of increasing GDP with the goal of improving human wellbeing within planetary boundaries. Key advances discussed in this Review include: the development of ecological macroeconomic models that test policies for managing without growth; understanding and reducing the growth dependencies that tie social welfare to increasing GDP in the current economy; and characterising the policies and provisioning systems that would allow resource use to be reduced while improving human wellbeing. Despite recent advances in post-growth research, important questions remain, such as the politics of transition, and transformations in the relationship between the Global North and the Global South.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3

Cites

178 of 178 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 182 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Köberle, 2021, The cost of mitigation revisited, Nat Clim Chang, 11, 1035, 10.1038/s41558-021-01203-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–263 of 263

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D.
Affiliations
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • York University (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Boston College (US)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Kallis, Giorgos
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet Planetary Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
e62-e78
ISSN
2542-5196 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3
OpenAlex
W4406641222
Cited by
261
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 171 · 2025: 90
FWCI
48.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2025-06-01)
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet Planetary Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research (Auckland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/T014881/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
post-growth, well-being, planetary boundaries, economic growth, ecological macroeconomics, social welfare (welfare economics), resource consumption reduction, provisioning systems, economic transition, North-South relations
MeSH terms
Sustainable Development, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Social Welfare, Economic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review