Cited by 249Misinformation and Its ImpactsVaccine Coverage and HesitancySocial Media in Health Education

Vaccine misinformation and social media

Open access
Burki, Talha·2019·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

On Aug 19, 2019, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson outlined plans for a summit of social media firms to discuss how to promote accurate information about vaccination. The announcement accompanied the news that WHO no longer considers the UK to have eliminated measles. Coverage of the second dose of the measles–mumps– rubella (MMR) vaccine in the country has fallen to 87%, lower than the 95% required for herd immunity. “I am afraid people have just been listening to that superstitious mumbo-jumbo on the Internet, all that antivax stuff, and thinking that the MMR vaccine is a bad idea”, commented Johnson on a visit to a hospital in southwest England.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30136-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reaching required vaccination levels should not be assumed given well-documented evidence of vaccine hesitancy across the world, which is often fuelled by online and offline misinformation.

    “Reaching these required vaccination levels should not be assumed given well-documented evidence of vaccine hesitancy across the world 17 , which is often fuelled by online and offline misinformation surrounding the importance, safety or effectiveness of vaccines 18-20 .”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burki, T.
Corresponding author
Burki, Talha
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
e258-e259
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2977219551
Cited by
243
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
71.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
vaccine misinformation, social media, anti-vaccine movement, MMR vaccine, herd immunity, vaccination coverage, measles elimination, misinformation countermeasures, online health information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review