Cited by 816Communication and COVID-19 ImpactData-Driven Disease SurveillanceMisinformation and Its Impacts

What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: A scoping review

Open access
Tsao, Shu-Feng, Chen, Helen, Tisseverasinghe, Therese, Yang, Yang, Li, Lianghua, Butt, Zahid A·2021·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, social media has rapidly become a crucial communication tool for information generation, dissemination, and consumption. In this scoping review, we selected and examined peer-reviewed empirical studies relating to COVID-19 and social media during the first outbreak from November, 2019, to November, 2020. From an analysis of 81 studies, we identified five overarching public health themes concerning the role of online social media platforms and COVID-19. These themes focused on: surveying public attitudes, identifying infodemics, assessing mental health, detecting or predicting COVID-19 cases, analysing government responses to the pandemic, and evaluating quality of health information in prevention education videos. Furthermore, our Review emphasises the paucity of studies on the application of machine learning on data from COVID-19-related social media and a scarcity of studies documenting real-time surveillance that was developed with data from social media on COVID-19. For COVID-19, social media can have a crucial role in disseminating health information and tackling infodemics and misinformation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30315-0

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsao, S.-F., Chen, H., Tisseverasinghe, T., Yang, Y., Li, L., & Butt, Z. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Seneca Polytechnic (CA)
Corresponding author
Butt, Zahid A
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
e175-e194
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120829418
Cited by
816
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 211 · 2021: 97
FWCI
36.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, social media, infodemic, misinformation, public attitudes, mental health, case finding, government pandemic response, health information quality, machine learning, real-time surveillance, health communication
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Disease Outbreaks, Health Education, Humans, Public Health, Pandemics, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review