The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research
Abstract
This book gives an up-to-date overview of methodological and data-analytical issues of cross-cultural studies. Written by leading experts in the field, it presents the most important tools for doing cross-cultural research and outlines design considerations, methods, and analytical techniques that can improve ecological validity and help researchers to avoid pitfalls in cross-cultural psychology. By focusing on the relevant research questions that can be tackled with particular methods, it provides practical guidance on how to translate conceptual questions into decisions on study design and statistical techniques. Featuring examples from cognitive and educational assessment, personality, health, and intercultural communication and management, and illustrating key techniques in feature boxes, this concise and accessible guide is essential reading for researchers, graduate students, and professionals who work with culture-comparative data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Van de Vijver, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89 · Cited by 1,152
Measuring Social Desirability: Short Forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale
Fischer, D. G., & Fick, C. (1993) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164493053002011 · Cited by 580
Cross-Cultural Assessment of the Five-Factor Model: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J.-P., & Parker, W. D. (1998) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022198291009 · Cited by 406
Cited by
Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1197754 · Cited by 3,252
Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being
Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7 · Cited by 1,864
Social Withdrawal in Childhood
Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., & Bowker, J. C. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163642 · Cited by 1,503
The world of emotions is not two-dimensional
Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x · Cited by 1,179
The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance1
Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148745 · Cited by 1,169
Metadata
- Authors
- van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2021-06-15
- OpenAlex
- W1821066201
- Cited by
- 2,612
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 132.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9781107415188
- The paper
- van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2021). Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415188
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
