Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Social Shaping of Technology (SST)

Williams, Robin·2019·Science, Technology, and Society
DOI 10.1017/9781316691489.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781316691489.006

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. 10.1177/016224399201700305 · DOI
  2. Cronberg, 1995, Similar concerns, different styles? Technology studies in Western Europe
  3. Latour, 1987, Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society
  4. MacKenzie, 1985, The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum
  5. Sørensen, 1996, Learning technology, constructing culture: Socio-technical change as social learning
  6. 10.1177/016224399301800306 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Pollock, 2009, Software and organisations: The biography of the enterprise-wide system—or how SAP conquered the world
  8. Sørensen, 1994, The car and its environments—The past, present and future of the motorcar in Europe
  9. Cockburn, 1993, Gender and technology in the making
  10. Rip, 2002, Shaping 161technology, guiding policy: Concepts, spaces and tools, 145
  11. 10.1080/09505430601022668 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF01891442 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0306312786016002008 · DOI
  14. Noble, 1984, Forces of production: A social history of industrial automation
  15. 10.4324/9780203401491_chapter_2 · DOI
  16. Sørensen, 1999, Similar concerns, different styles? Technology studies in Europe, II
  17. Latour, 1988, Technology and social process, 20
  18. Clausen, 1997, The social shaping of computer-aided production management and computer integrated manufacture: Proceedings of the COST A4 workshop, 2
  19. Rip, 1995, Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment
  20. 10.1007/978-0-387-34872-8_20 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sørensen, 1994, Domestic technology and everyday life—mutual shaping processes, 1, 157
  22. 10.1007/978-1-349-15725-9 · DOI
  23. Westrum, 1991, Technologies and society: The shaping of people and things
  24. Russell, 1988, Opening the black box and closing it behind you: On micro-sociology in the social analysis of technology
  25. Law, 1988, Technology and social process, 44
  26. 10.1086/512835 · DOI
  27. Williams, 2005, Social learning in technological innovation: Experimenting with information and communication technologies
  28. 10.1177/0162243905276501 · DOI
  29. Rose, 1976, The radicalisation of science, ideology of/in the natural sciences
  30. 10.1080/09537325.2011.592284 · DOI
  31. Hetland, 1995, Proceedings of COST A4, 7, 31
  32. Wyatt, 1998, Technology’s arrow: Developing information networks for public administration in Britain and the United States
  33. Hyysalo, 2004, Uses of innovation: Wristcare in the practices of engineers and elderly
  34. 10.1177/016224399301800107 · DOI
  35. Weber, 2014, The success and failure of combined heat and power (CHP) in the UK, Germany and the Netherlands: Revisiting Stewart Russell’s perspective on technology choices in society, Science and Technology Studies, 27, 15, 10.23987/sts.55313 · DOI
  36. Adams, 1979, The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy: A trilogy in five parts
  37. Akrich, 1992, Shaping technology—Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 205
  38. Andersen, 1988, Small countries facing the technological revolution, 9
  39. 10.2307/2295952 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Berg, A.-J. , & Aune, M. (1994). The domestication of telematics in everyday life. Proceedings of the COST A4 Workshop Domestic technology and everyday life—Mutual shaping processes (Vol. 1). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community.
  41. Bijker, 1988, The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology
  42. Callon, 1986, Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge?, 196
  43. Callon, 1981, Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro- sociologies, 277
  44. 10.1108/info-04-2015-0024 · DOI
  45. Carson, 1962, Silent spring
  46. Clark, 1997, The social shaping of computer-aided production management and computer integrated manufacture: Proceedings of the COST A4 workshop, 2, 49
  47. Collingridge, 1992, The management of scale: Big organizations, big decisions, big mistakes
  48. Cronberg, 1995, Similar concerns, different styles? Technology studies in western Europe, 1
  49. Dierkes, 1992, New technology at the outset: Social forces in the shaping of technological innovations
  50. 10.1177/016224399101600102 · DOI · Paper page
  51. du Gay, 1997, Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman
  52. Faulkner, 1985, Smothered by invention: Technology in women’s lives
  53. Fischer, 1992, America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940, 10.1525/9780520915008 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Fleck, 1988, lnnofusion or diffusation? The nature of technological development in robotics
  55. 10.1016/0016-3287(90)90131-Z · DOI
  56. Frissen, 1998, Proceedings from the COST A4, Granite workshop, 7
  57. 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Gibson, 1979, The ecological approach to perception
  59. Green, 1993, Gendered by design? Information technology and office systems
  60. 10.3233/IP-2002-0008 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Heeks, 2009, The ICT4D 2.0 manifesto: Where next for ICTs and international development?
  62. 10.1177/0306312786016002004 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1080/09537329808524310 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Kline, 1994, The car and its environments—The past, present and future of the motorcar in Europe, 69
  65. Lie, 1996, Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life
  66. 10.1504/IJBIS.2007.012544 · DOI
  67. Latour, 1983, Science observed, 141
  68. Lievrouw, 2009, New media, 1, 10.4135/9781446262658 · DOI
  69. 10.1177/030631292022004006 · DOI · Paper page
  70. MacKenzie, 1990, Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance
  71. MacKenzie, 1999, The social shaping of technology
  72. 10.4324/9780203265864 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Rip, 1998, Human choice and climate change: An international assessment
  75. Russell, 2002, Shaping technology, guiding policy: Concepts, spaces and tools, 37
  76. 10.1177/016224399201700103 · DOI
  77. Schwartz Cowan, 1983, More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave
  78. Silverstone, 1992, Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces
  79. 10.1177/016224399201700102 · DOI
  80. 10.1287/isre.1110.0352 · DOI
  81. Sørensen, 2002, Shaping technology, guiding policy: Concepts, spaces and tools
  82. 10.1142/S1363919608002035 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1108/09593841211254321 · DOI
  84. 10.3152/147154399781782536 · DOI
  85. Von Hippel, 2001, Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software, MIT Sloan Management Review, 42, 82
  86. Wajcman, 1991, Feminism confronts technology
  87. Williams, 1995, Proceedings of the InternationalCOST A4 conference
  88. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000437 · DOI
  89. Winner, 1980, Do artifacts have politics?, Daedalus, 109, 121
  90. 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.004 · DOI
  91. 10.14452/MR-026-03-1974-07_1 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1177/016224399201700306 · DOI
  93. 10.1177/030631284014003004 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Williams, R.
Venue
Science, Technology, and Society
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2019-11-21
Pages
138-162
DOI
10.1017/9781316691489.006
Cited by
13
References
6
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Social Shaping of Technology (SST). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9781316691489.006
The paper
Williams, R. (2019). The Social Shaping of Technology (SST). Science, Technology, and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316691489.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.