The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimedia Learning
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article defines and exemplifies multimedia learning and multimedia instruction, describes theoretical frameworks for multimedia learning and multimedia instruction, summarizes evidence-based principles for how to design multimedia instruction, and suggests future trends in multimedia research. Multimedia design principles for reducing extraneous processing include the coherence principle, signaling principle, redundancy principle, spatial contiguity principle, and temporal contiguity principle. Multimedia design principles for managing essential processing include the pre-training principle, segmenting principle, and modality principle. Multimedia design principles for fostering generative processing include the personalization principle, voice principle, embodiment principle, and generative activity principle. Research on multimedia learning represents an example of applying the science of learning to education, and stands as one of educational psychology’s success stories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The VR-STINAT was iteratively developed with the involvement of end-users (CBT therapists, psychiatrists, patients with depression, and healthy individuals), based on cognitive load theory -learning from worked example (33), and Mayer’s cognitive theory of multimedia learning (34).”
From A virtual reality-based self-guided training on identification of negative automatic thoughts in healthy adults: a mixed-methods feasibility study (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Baddeley, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1736359 · Cited by 5,258
Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2 · Cited by 2,894
Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358 · Cited by 1,539
Self-citationWhy Some Material Is Difficult to Learn
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1 · Cited by 1,455
Kozma, R. B. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002179 · Cited by 1,429
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312 · Cited by 1,315
Self-citationMayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389 · Cited by 1,191
Self-citationWhen is an illustration worth ten thousand words?
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationMayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187 · Cited by 1,029
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_6 · Cited by 4,207
Self-citationAkçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 · Cited by 2,463
First principles of instruction
Merrill, M. D. (2002) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02505024 · Cited by 2,092
Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012) · Cited by 2,038
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2014) · The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.005 · Cited by 1,976
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayer, R.
- Corresponding author
- Mayer, Richard
- ORCID
- Mayer, Richard
- Venue
- The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2020-06-25
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 27-139
- ISSN
- 0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2337068785
- Cited by
- 7,777
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 644 · 2025: 464 · 2024: 351 · 2023: 303 · 2022: 283 · 2021: 465 · 2020: 384
- FWCI
- 375.16
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- multimedia learning, multimedia teaching, multimedia design principles, coherence principle, signaling principle, redundancy principle, spatial contiguity, temporal contiguity, modality principle, generative processing, science of learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
