The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why a Standardization of Strontium Isotope Baseline Environmental Data Is Needed and Recommendations for Methodology
Abstract
Since initial applications of strontium isotope human sourcing in the early 1990s, the use of the method has steadily increased in archaeology and in anthropology more broadly. Despite this trend, the collection of necessary baseline environmental data has not been standardized and sometimes does not occur at all. A thorough environmental sampling strategy will ensure that all the variability within a selected region is documented, which is a critical step to improving the accuracy of sourcing studies. Furthermore, shared strontium baseline data collections are needed to improve the intercomparability of datasets and results. This paper provides a case study from a semiarid region in northwestern New Mexico, USA, highlighting the need for a bottom-up approach to baseline data collection (from bedrock to animal) and describes the methods of pre-field planning and collecting, including rationales for what samples to collect for Sr isotope baseline data. The authors hope that this paper will lay a foundation for the implementation and standardization of Sr isotope baseline data collecting, which does not currently exist.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Organismal differences in dietary preference, metabolism, and morphology (e.g.differing plant root depths) might lead to differential proportions in the mix of strontium sources between producers and different levels of consumers throughout the food web”
From An archaeological strontium isoscape for the prehistoric andes: understanding population mobility through a geostatistical meta-analysis of archaeological 87Sr/86Sr values from humans, animals, and artifacts (2020) · cites this paper as Grimstead, et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Kohn, M. J., Morris, J., & Olin, P. (2013) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.11.012 · Cited by 80
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1006/jasc.1999.0504 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10816-014-9228-5 · DOI
- 10.1006/jasc.1994.1031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2004.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0047-2484(85)80029-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Evans, 2004, Defining “Local Signature” in Terms of Sr Isotope Composition Using a Tenth to Twelfth-Century Anglo-Saxon Population Living on a Jurassic Clay-Carbonate Terrain, Rutland, UK, Forensic Geoscience: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, 232, 237
- 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330250505 · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.3521 · DOI
- 10.1144/0016-76492008-043 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2006.10.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2006.02.012 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.211305498 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0012-821X(92)90028-T · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00093315 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00419.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00090-4 · DOI
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0129:LPMHSM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1006/jasc.1998.0315 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.219.4582.289 · DOI
- 10.1006/jasc.1996.0129 · DOI
- 10.1002/gea.21545 · DOI
- Davenport, 1991, Definition of Large Scale Zones of Hydrothermal Alteration by Geochemical Mapping Using Organic Lake Sediment, Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Sect. B, Applied Earth Science, 100, 111
- 10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00102-X · DOI
- 10.1080/10256016.2015.1021345 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-6742(90)90070-Q · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2012.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jasc.2001.0787 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.22235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3809405 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2011.10.003 · DOI
- Warham Joseph O. 2012 Mapping Biosphere Strontium Isotope Ratios across Major Lithologic Boundaries. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Division of Archaeological, Geographical, and Environmental Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
- 10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00025-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/rcm.5131 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.20111 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-4754.00047 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0003598X00064693 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2008.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jas.2005.01.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.06.029 · DOI
- 10.1016/0305-4403(91)90074-Y · DOI
- 10.1017/S104566350000763X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/40035859 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00134-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00410-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0883-2927(94)90063-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-6742(93)90043-L · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thomsen, E., & Andreasen, R. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav8083 · Cited by 183
Scaffidi, B. K., & Knudson, K. J. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105121 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Grimstead, D. N., Nugent, S., & Whipple, J.
- Venue
- Advances in Archaeological Practice
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-03-27
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-195
- ISSN
- 2326-3768
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review