The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THEORY IN COLLABORATIVE INDIGENOUS ARCHAEOLOGY: INSIGHTS FROM MOHEGAN
Abstract
There is little doubt that Indigenous, collaborative, and community-based archaeologies offer productive means of reshaping the ways in which archaeologists conduct research in North America. Scholarly reporting, however, typically places less emphasis on the ways in which Indigenous and collaborative versions of archaeology influence our interpretations of the past and penetrate archaeology at the level of theory. In this article, we begin to fill this void, critically considering archaeological research and teaching at Mohegan in terms of the deeper impacts that Indigenous knowledge, interests, and sensitivities make via collaborative projects. We frame the collaboration as greater than the sum of its heterogeneous components, including its diverse human participants. From this perspective, the project produces new and valuable orientations toward current theoretical debates in archaeology. We address these themes as they relate to ongoing research and teaching at several eighteenth- and nineteenth-century sites on the Mohegan Reservation in Uncasville, Connecticut.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A growing body of scholarship has demonstrated how research based in community values and knowledge can drive and enrich the production of both community and academic knowledge.
“Contrary to critiques about the rigor of Indigenous archaeologies as social projects that do not contribute to academic knowledge production (e.g., McGhee 2008McGhee , 2010)), a growing body of scholarship has demonstrated how research based in community values and knowledge can drive and enrich the production of both community and academic knowledge (e.g., Cipolla et al. 2019;Croes 2010;Gonzalez”
From Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America (2022) · cites this paper as Cipolla et al. 2019
Citations
Cites
Bundled Worlds: The Roles and Interactions of Complex Objects from the North American Plains
Zedeño, M. N. (2008) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-008-9058-4 · Cited by 157
Archaeological Theory in the New Millennium: Introducing Current Perspectives
Harris, O. J. T., & Cipolla, C. N. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315713250 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- Johnson, 2010, Archaeological Theory: An Introduction
- Deloria, 1995, Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact
- 10.1080/20518196.2016.1154734 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1380203817000150 · DOI
- Silliman, 2006, Collaborating at the Trowel's Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology, 67
- Descola, 2013, Beyond Nature and Culture, 10.7208/chicago/9780226145006.001.0001 · DOI
- Woodward, 1932, The Value of Indian Trade Goods in the Study of Archaeology, Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 3, 8
- 10.1017/S0959774309000596 · DOI
- 10.1080/00438240701679411 · DOI · Paper page
- Zedeño, 2013, Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things, 117
- Watts, 2013, Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things
- Olsen, 2012, After Interpretation: Remembering Archaeology, Current Swedish Archaeology, 20, 11, 10.37718/CSA.2012.01 · DOI
- Alberti, 2014, Making and Growing: Anthropological Studies of Organisms and Artefacts, 107
- Vizenor, 1999, Manifest Manners: Narratives of Postindian Survivance
- DeLanda, 1997, A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History
- 10.1007/BF03373477 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0959774309000535 · DOI
- Silliman, 2006, Collaboration at the Trowel's Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology
- Fawcett, 2000, Medicine Trail: The Life and Lessons of Gladys Tantaquidgeon
- Atalay, 2012, Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities, 10.1525/9780520953468 · DOI
- Lowenthal, 1985, The Past Is a Foreign Country
- Cipolla, 2017, Foreign Objects: Rethinking Indigenous Consumption in American Archaeology
- 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01513.x · DOI
- 10.14318/hau3.1.014 · DOI
- DeLanda, 2016, Assemblage Theory, 10.1515/9781474413640 · DOI
- Said, 1978, Orientalism
- Olsen, 2010, In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects
- 10.7183/0002-7316.81.1.27 · DOI
- Colwell-Chanthaphohn, 2008, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities
- Levy, 2017, Áhki Wuyitupôhtam (The Land Is Sacred): A Career in the Sacred, SAA Archaeological Record, 17, 23
- Bendremer, 2006, Collaborating at the Trowel's Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology, 50
- 10.1007/BF03376905 · DOI
- 10.1080/00293650310000650 · DOI · Paper page
- Bradley, 1983, Proceedings of the 1982 Glass Trade Bead Conference, 29
- Hayes, 1983, Proceedings of the 1982 Glass Trade Bead Conference
- 10.1111/johs.12124 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1908224 · DOI
- 10.1080/19492901.2014.11728458 · DOI
- Cipolla, 2017b, Foreign Objects: Rethinking Indigenous Consumption in American Archaeology, 222
- Nicholas, 2010, Being and Becoming Indigenous Archaeologists
- 10.1017/S0002731600047314 · DOI
- Vizenor, 2008, Survivance: Narratives of Native Presence
- McMullen, 1987, A Key Into the Language of Woodsplint Baskets
- 10.1007/s10761-009-0088-8 · DOI
- Bruchac, 2005, Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonizing Theory and Practice, 56
- Colwell-Chanthaphohn, 2012, Archaeological Theory Today, 267
- Karklins, 1985, Glass Beads: The 19th Century Levin Catalogue and Venetian Bead Book and Guide to Description of Glass Beads
- Deloria, 2003, God Is Red: A Native View of Religion
- Nicholas, 1997, At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada
- 10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5_3 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1380203814000130 · DOI
- 10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0002731600048575 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199696697.003.0023 · DOI
- Vizenor, 2008, Survivance: Narratives of Native Presence, 1
- 10.5744/florida/9780813060705.003.0007 · DOI
- Watkins, 2000, Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice
- Edgeworth, 2011, Fluid Pasts: Archaeologies of Flow
- Glaza Tobias 2003 A Historical Ethnobotany of the Pequot Indians of Southeastern Connecticut 1800–1950: New Insights Using a Multi-disciplinary Approach. Master's thesis, Department of Botany, Connecticut College, New London, Connecticut.
- Alberti, 2012, Archaeology After Interpretation: Returning Materials to Archaeological Theory
- Fawcett, 1995, The Lasting of the Mohegans: The Story of the Wolf People
- Bennett, 2010, Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, 10.1215/9780822391623 · DOI
- Kidd, 1970, Canadian Historic Sites: Occasional Papers in Archaeology and History, 45
- 10.1017/S1380203818000077 · DOI
- Viveiros de Castro, 2015, Who Is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? Some Comments on an Ongoing Anthropological Debate, Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33, 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America
Laluk, N. C., Montgomery, L. M., Tsosie, R., McCleave, C., Miron, R., Carroll, S. R., Aguilar, J., Thompson, A. B. W., Nelson, P., Sunseri, J., et al. (2022) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2022.59 · Cited by 59
The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration
Montgomery, L. M., & Fryer, T. C. (2023) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2023.98 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Cipolla, C. N., Quinn, J., & Levy, J.
- Venue
- American Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-21
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-142
- ISSN
- 0002-7316
- 2325-5064
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review