Cited by 1,619COVID-19 epidemiological studiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Open access
Sanche, Steven, Lin, Yen Ting, Xu, Chonggang, Romero-Severson, Ethan, Hengartner, Nick, Ke, Ruian·2020·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract The novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) is a recently emerged human pathogen that has spread widely since January 2020. Initially, the basic reproductive number, R 0 , was estimated to be 2.2 to 2.7. Here we provide a new estimate of this quantity. We collected extensive individual case reports and estimated key epidemiology parameters, including the incubation period. Integrating these estimates and high-resolution real-time human travel and infection data with mathematical models, we estimated that the number of infected individuals during early epidemic double every 2.4 days, and the R 0 value is likely to be between 4.7 and 6.6. We further show that quarantine and contact tracing of symptomatic individuals alone may not be effective and early, strong control measures are needed to stop transmission of the virus. One-sentence summary By collecting and analyzing spatiotemporal data, we estimated the transmission potential for 2019-nCoV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid2607.200282

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A novel COVID-19 vaccine will need to be accepted by at least 55% of the population to provide herd immunity, with estimates reaching as high as 85% depending on country and infection rate.

    “It is estimated that a novel COVID-19 vaccine will need to be accepted by at least 55% of the population to provide herd immunity, with estimates reaching as high as 85% depending on country and infection rate 15,16 .”

    From Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    In Results, “Implications for Intervention Strategies” (page not provided), the paper gives herd-immunity thresholds of 55% at R₀ = 2.2 and 82% at R₀ = 5.7. It does not give an 85% estimate or equate the proportion accepting a vaccine with the proportion becoming immune; it also does not establish country-specific thresholds. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In both countries, as of September 2020, fewer people would 'definitely' take a COVID-19 vaccine than is likely required for herd immunity.

    “Here we show that in both countries-as of September 2020-fewer people would 'definitely' take a vaccine than is likely required for herd immunity”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanche, S., Lin, Y. T., Xu, C., Romero-Severson, E., Hengartner, N., & Ke, R.
Affiliations
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Ke, Ruian
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1470-1477
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W3014712943
Cited by
1,619
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 231 · 2021: 529 · 2020: 642
FWCI
60.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (#89233218CNA000001)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011938513)
  • National Nuclear Security Administration (89233218C-NA000001)
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI135946)
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (89233218CNA 000001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, basic reproduction number, doubling time, incubation period, serial interval, outbreak dynamics, Wuhan, transmission dynamics, contact tracing, quarantine, social distancing, epidemic modeling
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, China, Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Pneumonia, Viral, Travel, Coronavirus Infections, Basic Reproduction Number, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review