The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages
Abstract
Introduction The study of phonological acquisition at the very earliest stages is making notable progress. Virtuosic experimental work accessing the linguistic knowledge of infants has yielded extraordinary findings demonstrating the precocity of some aspects of acquisition. Moreover, phonologists now possess an important resource, Optimality Theory (OT) (Prince and Smolensky 1993), which permits theorising to relate more closely to the findings of experimental work. The purpose of this chapter is to outline one way in which these experimental and theoretical research lines can be brought closer together. The central idea is that current phonological theory can, without essential distortion, be assigned an architecture that conforms closely to the process of acquisition as it is observed in children. I conclude with a speculative, though reasonably comprehensive, picture of how phonological acquisition might proceed. Empirical focus To avoid confusion, I will try to make clear that my view of what ‘phonological acquisition’ involves may be broader than the reader is predisposed to expect. When we study how very young children learn language, we can follow two paths. One is to examine what children say; the other is to develop methods that can determine what children understand or perceive. The reason these two methods are so different is that (by universal consensus of researchers) acquisition is always more advanced in the domain of perception than production: children often cannot utter things that they are able to perceive and understand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
Kuhl, P. K. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212211 · Cited by 1,331
Infants' Preference for the Predominant Stress Patterns of English Words
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J. (1993) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131210 · Cited by 981
Speech Perception by the Chinchilla: Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in Alveolar Plosive Consonants
Kuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1166301 · Cited by 691
Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change.
Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.672 · Cited by 607
Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli
Kuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D. (1978) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.381770 · Cited by 430
Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques
Kuhl, P. K., & Padden, D. M. (1983) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.389148 · Cited by 231
Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques
Kuhl, P. K., & Padden, D. M. (1982) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03204208 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm
Boersma, P., & Hayes, B. (2001) · Linguistic Inquiry · doi:10.1162/002438901554586 · Cited by 1,115
Self-citationRules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study
Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00146-x · Cited by 769
Self-citationThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.001.0001 · Cited by 639
The Cartography of Syntactic Structures
Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003 · Cited by 639
The Acquisition of Morphophonology
MacWhinney, B. (1978) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166047 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayes, B.
- Venue
- Constraints in Phonological Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2004-01-15
- Pages
- 158-203
- OpenAlex
- W2182486909
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 48.33
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511486418.006
- The paper
- Hayes, B. (2004). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages. Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486418.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.