CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 171Phonetics and Phonology ResearchAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeuroscience and Music Perception

Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques

Open access
Kuhl, Patricia K., Padden, Denise M.·1982·Perception & Psychophysics
DOI 10.3758/bf03204208
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03204208

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monkeys show peaks in sensitivity that coincide with the phonetic boundaries used by languages.

    “In tests of discrimination, monkeys showed peaks in sensitivity that coincided with the phonetic boundaries used by languages (20–22) (Fig. 4).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. CARNEY, A. E., WIDIN, G. P., & VIB..BISTJ:R. N. F. Non- categorical perception of stop consonants differina in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977, 62, 961-970.
  2. EILERS, R. E., GAVIN. W., & WILSON, W. R. Linaulstic experi- ence and phonemic perception in infancy: A cross-linauistic study. Child Development, 1979, 50,14-18.
  3. EI..AI, P. D. Auditory and Unaulstlc processln, of cues for place of artIcul.tion by Infants. hrceptlon 4 Psychophysics, 1974,16,513-521. (.)
  4. EI..AI, P. D. Linaulstlc processlna of speech by youn, infants. In R. Schlefelbusch • L. Lloyd (Bds.), Languag~and per- spectlva-Acquisltion, retardation,and Intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974. (
  5. EI..AI, P. D., & TARTT&R, V. C. On the development of speech perception: Mech.nisms and .natoaies.ln H. W. Reese. L. P. Llpsltt (Bds.), Advances in c1llld development and behavior (Vol. 13).New York: Academic Press, 1979.
  6. FIIHBR.JORGBNION, E. Acoustic analysis of stop consonants. MiscellaneaP1IoMtlca, 1954,2,42-59.
  7. GREEN, D. M., & SWBTI, J. A. Signal detection t1leory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley,1966.
  8. In P. D. Elmu • J. L. Miller (Eds.), hl'8pectiws on tM study ofspeech. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlb.um, 1981.
  9. KUHL, P. K. Predispositions for the perception of speech-sound cateaorles: A species•specific phenomenon? In F. D. Minifle • L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Communlcati~and cogniti~abilitiD- Early be1lavioral assessment. B.ltlmore: University P.rk Press, 1978.
  10. KUHL, P. K. Models and mechanlstns In speech perception: Species comparisons provide further contributions. B",in, JH. haviorandEvolution, 1979, 16,374-408.
  11. KUHL, P. K. Discrimination of speech by nonhuman animals: B.sic .udltory sensitivities conduclve to the perception of speech•sound cateaorles. Jouf1Ul1 of tM Acoustictll SocWty of Ammctl, 1981, 71, 340-~9.
  12. KUHL, P. K. Cateaorlzation of speech by infants. In J. Mehler • R. Fox (Bds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond tM blooming buuing co'lfuslon. Hilladale, N.J: Erlt.um, In press.
  13. LIIKBR, L., & ABRA"SON, A. S. A cross-Ianauaae study of vole- ina in initial stops: Acoustical meuurements. Word, 1964, 20, 384-422.
  14. MILLaR, J. D.• WI.a, C. C., PAITOU, R. E., KELLY, W. J., • DooLING, R. J. DIscrlmlnation and labellna of noise-buzz sequences with vary1na noise-lead times: An example of cate- ,orlc.1 perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Americtl, 1976.60,410-417.
  15. MouB, P. A. Infant speech perception: A preliminary model and review of the literature. In R. Schiefelbusch • L. Lloyd (Bds.). Langullge pel'8pectiva-Acquisition, retllrdation, lind intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974.
  16. Moua, P. A., " SNOWDON, C. T. An Investiptlon of cate- ,orlcal speech discrimlnation by rhesus monkeys. Perception 4 Psychophysics, 1975,17,9-16.
  17. RBPP, B. H. Relative amplitude of upiratlon noise u a volclna cue for syllable-initial stop consonants. Language and Speec1l, 1979,22,173-189.
  18. RoacH. E. Natural cateaorles. Cogniti~pqcltology, 1973, 4, 321-350.
  19. SnVl:N8. K. N. The quantai nature of speech: Evidence from' articulatory-acoustic data. In E. E. David, Jr., • P. B. Denes (Eds.), Hu"",,, communication: A unlfJed v~w. New York: MCOraw-Hill, 1972.
  20. SnVl:N8, K. N. Constraints Imposed by the auditory system on the properties used to clualfy speech sounds: Evidence from phonololY, acoustics, and JlIYCh~cs. In T. Myers, J. Laver, a: J. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in pqc1lology: T1w co,nit/~,..,..ntation ofspe«ll (Vol. 7). Atnsterdam: North- Hoiland, 1911.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Kuhl, P. K., & Padden, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
ORCID
Kuhl, Patricia K.
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1982-11
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
542-550
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
DOI
10.3758/bf03204208
OpenAlex
W2012714827
Cited by
171
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (8022492)
  • National Institutes of Health (RR001 66, 00166)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
voicing perception, voice onset time, macaque, speech sound discrimination, language evolution, auditory discrimination
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Female, Language, Macaca, Male, Phonetics, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review