The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse
Abstract
'Deliberative politics' refers to the role of conversation and arguments in politics. Until recently discussion of deliberative politics took place almost exclusively among political philosophers, but many questions raised in this philosophical discussion cry out for empirical investigation. This book provides the first extended empirical study of deliberative politics, addressing, in particular, questions of the preconditions and consequences of high level deliberation. Using parliamentary debates in Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States as an empirical base, the authors measure the level of deliberation by constructing a 'Discourse Quality Index'. As deliberative politics moves to the forefront of political theory, this book makes an important contribution to deliberative democracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement
Rawls, J. (2001) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0 · Cited by 5,761
LIFESPAN PSYCHOLOGY: Theory and Application to Intellectual Functioning
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471 · Cited by 1,281
Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa
Reynolds, A. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198295103.001.0001 · Cited by 276
McKeown, T. J. (1999) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081899550841 · Cited by 179
Cited by
The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory
Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533 · Cited by 956
A “Selection Model” of Political Representation*
Mansbridge, J. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00337.x · Cited by 563
Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Steiner, J. (2010) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.x · Cited by 493
Self-citationSurvey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn
Owen, D., & Smith, G. (2015) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12054 · Cited by 441
Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere
Habermas, J. (2022) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/02632764221112341 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. R.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2005-01-13
- OpenAlex
- W4211113163
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511491153
- The paper
- Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2005). Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511491153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
