The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand
Abstract
In a duopoly model where firms have private information about an uncertain linear demand, it is shown that if the goods are substitutes (not) to share information is a dominant strategy for each firm in Bertrand (Cournot) competition. If the goods are complements the result is reversed. Furthermore the following welfare results are obtained: (i) With substitutes in Cournot equilibrium the market outcome is never optimal with respect to information sharing but it may be optimal in Bertrand competition if the products are good substitutes. With complements the market outcome is always optimal. (ii) Bertrand competition is more efficient than Cournot competition. (iii) The private value of information to the firms is always positive but the social value of information is positive in Cournot and negative in Bertrand competition. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: 022, 026, 611. © 1985 Academic Press, Inc. Introduction Consider a symmetric differentiated duopoly model in which firms have private market data about the uncertain demand. We analyze two types of duopoly information equilibrium, Cournot and Bertrand, which emerge, respectively, from quantity and price competition, and show that the incentives for information sharing and its welfare consequences depend crucially on the type of competition, the nature of the goods (substitutes or complements), and the degree of product differentiation. The demand structure is linear and symmetric, and allows the goods to be substitutes, independent or complements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strategic information transmission
Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913390 · Cited by 4,293
Cited by
The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature
Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. R. (2010) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003 · Cited by 2,609
LEUZ, C., & WYSOCKI, P. D. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12115 · Cited by 1,760
Financial disclosure policy in an entry game
Darrough, M. N., & Stoughton, N. M. (1990) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(90)90048-9 · Cited by 850
Information Transmission--Cournot and Bertrand Equilibria
Gal-or, E. (1986) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297593 · Cited by 434
Strategic Information Revelation
Okuno-Fujiwara, M., Postlewaite, A., & Suzumura, K. (1990) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297541 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Vives, X.
- Venue
- Cournot Oligopoly
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1989-01-27
- Pages
- 317-341
- OpenAlex
- W1598143609
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.79
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511528231.019
- The paper
- Vives, X. (1989). Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. Cournot Oligopoly. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511528231.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.