The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life
Abstract
Nina Eliasoph's vivid portrait of American civic life reveals an intriguing culture of political avoidance. Despite the importance for democracy of open-ended political conversation among ordinary citizens, many Americans try hard to avoid appearing to care about politics. To discover how, where and why Americans create this culture of avoidance, the author accompanied suburban volunteers, activists, and recreation club members for over two years, listening to them talk - and avoid talking - about the wider world, together and in encounters with government, media, and corporate authorities. She shows how citizens create and express ideas in everyday life, contrasting their privately expressed convictions with their lack of public political engagement. Her book challenges received ideas about culture, power and democracy, while exposing the hard work of producing apathy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gershon, I. (2011) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/660866 · Cited by 616
A “Selection Model” of Political Representation*
Mansbridge, J. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00337.x · Cited by 563
Political News in the News Feed: Learning Politics from Social Media
Bode, L. (2016) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149 · Cited by 545
Democratic Contraction? Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States
Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2002) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240206700601 · Cited by 497
Dynamics of Political Polarization
Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200507 · Cited by 455
CITIZENSHIP AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
Theiss-Morse, E., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104829 · Cited by 406
Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America
Settle, J. E. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108560573 · Cited by 377
“I Just Google It”: Folk Theories of Distributed Discovery
Toff, B., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy009 · Cited by 270
Hasell, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2016) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12092 · Cited by 246
From “Third Place” to “Third Space”: Everyday Political Talk in Non-Political Online Spaces
Wright, S. (2012) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2012.11009088 · Cited by 142
The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?
Minozzi, W., Song, H., Lazer, D. M. J., Neblo, M. A., & Ognyanova, K. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12469 · Cited by 123
Disavowing Politics: Civic Engagement in an Era of Political Skepticism
Bennett, E. A., Cordner, A., Klein, P. T., Savell, S., & Baiocchi, G. (2013) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/674006 · Cited by 112
Kim, S., & Schachter, H. L. (2013) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576360304 · Cited by 75
Theory and Contrastive Explanation in Ethnography
Lichterman, P., & Reed, I. A. (2015) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114554458 · Cited by 71
Usher, N. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2175399 · Cited by 76
Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting
Johnson, C., Carlson, H. J., & Reynolds, S. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09679-w · Cited by 46
From Pillarized Active Membership to Populist Active Citizenship: The Dutch Do Democracy
Dekker, P. (2019) · Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-018-00058-4 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Eliasoph, N.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1998-08-13
- OpenAlex
- W4246335843
- Cited by
- 1,327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.