The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics
Abstract
Why has autonomy been a leading idea in philosophical writing on bioethics, and why has trust been marginal? In this important book, Onora O'Neill suggests that the conceptions of individual autonomy so widely relied on in bioethics are philosophically and ethically inadequate, and that they undermine rather than support relations of trust. She shows how Kant's non-individualistic view of autonomy provides a stronger basis for an approach to medicine, science and biotechnology, and does not marginalize untrustworthiness, while also explaining why trustworthy individuals and institutions are often undeservingly mistrusted. Her arguments are illustrated with issues raised by practices such as the use of genetic information by the police or insurers, research using human tissues, uses of new reproductive technologies, and media practices for reporting on medicine, science and technology. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics will appeal to a wide range of readers in ethics, bioethics and related disciplines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841286 · Cited by 6,103
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2024717 · Cited by 4,663
Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality
Elster, J. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171694 · Cited by 1,577
Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning
Blackburn, S. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198247852.001.0001 · Cited by 1,217
Cited by
Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review
Yaqub, O., Castle-Clarke, S., Sevdalis, N., & Chataway, J. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.018 · Cited by 1,089
In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability
Ryan, M. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y · Cited by 600
Laux, J., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2024) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12512 · Cited by 365
Artificial intelligence and the ongoing need for empathy, compassion and trust in healthcare
Kerasidou, A. (2020) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.19.237198 · Cited by 232
Attitudes of patients with anorexia nervosa to compulsory treatment and coercion
Tan, J. O. A., Stewart, A., Fitzpatrick, R., & Hope, T. (2010) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.10.003 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Neill, O.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2002-04-18
- OpenAlex
- W4211095984
- Cited by
- 1,202
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 30.40
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
