The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building Social Networks Via Computer Networks: Creating and Sustaining Distributed Learning Communities
Abstract
The ideal and widely held belief about communities is that they are composed of people who live close to each other, who freely share companionship, goods, services, and support of all kinds to other members of the community. Although this view still holds our hearts, it is often lamented as an ideal “lost” with the advent of urban life (Burbules, 2000; Fischer, 1982; Wellman, 1999a). However, we still find ourselves as members of communities, tied to others by kinship, friendship, work, and neighborhood. What has changed is our ability to maintain relationships with more far-flung intimates and associates, using the telephone, cars, airplanes, and electronic communication to keep in contact. Communities exist “liberated” from geography and neighborhood (Wellman, 1979). We can define community based on what we do with others, rather than where we live with others in terms of the social networks we maintain (Fischer, 1982; Wellman, 1988, 1999a; Wellman & Gulia, 1999a). Viewing community as resting on an underlying social network provides us with a way of examining and understanding the basis of computer-networked communities (Wellman et al., 1996) – communities where geographical colocation and face-to-face meetings have been removed as prerequisites for communal ties, where people do not need to meet face to face and yet sustain personal relationships with others within a community context. A social network perspective lets us explore some of the ambiguities of online communities, such as how “community” can be used to refer to both “networks of virtual strangers exchanging ideas and information” and “virtual friends debating the finer points of gender-bending their online personae” (McLaughlin, Osborn & Smith, 1995, p. 93).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/63.2.482 · Cited by 1,731
Cited by
Social networks and Internet connectivity effects
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180500146185 · Cited by 1,315
Self-citationStrong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media
Haythornthwaite, C. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290108195 · Cited by 747
Self-citationFrancescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/0273475318818864 · Cited by 181
Internet delivered diabetes self-management education: a review
Pereira, K., Phillips, B., Johnson, C., & Vorderstrasse, A. (2015) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2014.0155 · Cited by 134
Hrastinski, S. (2010) · Integrated Series in Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_6 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Haythornthwaite, C.
- Venue
- Building Virtual Communities
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2002-07-08
- Pages
- 159-190
- OpenAlex
- W300622861
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 36.25
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building Social Networks Via Computer Networks: Creating and Sustaining Distributed Learning Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511606373.011
- The paper
- Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Building Social Networks Via Computer Networks: Creating and Sustaining Distributed Learning Communities. Building Virtual Communities. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511606373.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.