Cited by 134Diabetes Management and EducationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Internet delivered diabetes self-management education: a review

Pereira, Katherine, Phillips, Beth, Johnson, Constance, Vorderstrasse, Allison·2015·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management education is a cornerstone of successful diabetes management. Various methods have been used to reach the increasing numbers of patients with diabetes, including Internet-based education. The purpose of this article is to review various delivery methods of Internet diabetes education that have been evaluated, as well as their effectiveness in improving diabetes-related outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature was identified in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Medline, EBSCO, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases through searches using the following terms: "type 2 diabetes AND internet/web based AND education" and "type 2 diabetes AND diabetes self-management education (DSME) AND web-based/internet OR technology assisted education." The search was limited to English language articles published in the last 10 years. The search yielded 111 articles; of these, 14 met criteria for inclusion in this review. Nine studies were randomized controlled trials, and study lengths varied from 2 weeks to 24 months, for a total of 2,802 participants. RESULTS: DSME delivered via the Internet is effective at improving measures of glycemic control and diabetes knowledge compared with usual care. In addition, results demonstrate that improved eating habits and increased attendance at clinic appointments occur after the online DSME, although engagement and usage of Internet materials waned over time. Interventions that included an element of interaction with healthcare providers were seen as attractive to participants. CONCLUSIONS: Internet-delivered diabetes education has the added benefit of easier access for many individuals, and patients can self-pace themselves through materials. More research on the cost-benefits of Internet diabetes education and best methods to maintain patient engagement are needed, along with more studies assessing the long-term impact of Internet-delivered DSME.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2014.0155

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pereira, K., Phillips, B., Johnson, C., & Vorderstrasse, A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2015-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
55-63
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W1567875252
Cited by
134
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
diabetes self-management education, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, diabetes knowledge, dietary habits, patient engagement, online health interventions, patient-provider interaction, health care access
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Information Storage and Retrieval, Internet, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review