Cited by 1,823Economic and Environmental ValuationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsTransportation Planning and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer

Hensher, David A., Rose, John M., Greene, William H.·2005·Cambridge University Press eBooks

DOI 10.1017/cbo9780511610356

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Almost without exception, everything human beings undertake involves a choice. In recent years there has been a growing interest in the development and application of quantitative statistical methods to study choices made by individuals with the purpose of gaining a better understanding both of how choices are made and of forecasting future choice responses. In this primer the authors provide an unintimidating introduction to the main techniques of choice analysis and include detail on themes such as data collection and preparation, model estimation and interpretation and the design of choice experiments. A companion website to the book provides practice data sets and software to estimate the main discrete choice models such as multinomial logit, nested logit and mixed logit. This primer will be an invaluable resource to students as well as of immense value to consultants and professionals, researchers and anyone else interested in choice analysis and modelling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511610356

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,001

Means matter, but variance matter too: Decomposing response latency influences on variance heterogeneity in stated preference experiments
Rose, J. M., & Black, I. (2006) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-006-8632-3 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Important features of home-based support services for older Australians and their informal carers
McCaffrey, N., Gill, L., Kaambwa, B., Cameron, I. D., Patterson, J., Crotty, M., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.12185 · Cited by 45
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers
Morel, T., Aymé, S., Cassiman, D. M., Simoens, S., Morgan, M., & Vandebroek, M. L. (2016) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0444-9 · Cited by 50
Public bike system pricing and usage in Taipei
Lin, J., Wang, N.-L., & Feng, C. (2017) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568318.2017.1301601 · Cited by 46
Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature
Michaels-Igbokwe, C., MacDonald, S. E., & Currie, G. R. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0244-x · Cited by 47
Social exclusion: The roles of mobility and bridging social capital in regional Australia
Stanley, J. K., Stanley, J., Balbontín, C., & Hensher, D. A. (2018) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.015 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Spatial variation in the morphological traits of Pocillopora verrucosa along a depth gradient in Taiwan
Soto, D., Palmas, S. D., Ho, M., Denis, V., & Chen, C. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202586 · Cited by 50
Consumer Preferences for Solar Energy: A Choice Experiment Study
Mamkhezri, J., Thacher, J., & Chermak, J. M. (2020) · Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.41.5.jmam · Cited by 41
Role of Attitudes in Transit and Auto Users’ Mode Choice of Ridesourcing
Azimi, G., Rahimi, A., Asgari, H., & Jin, X. (2020) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/0361198120941841 · Cited by 46
Heterogeneity in Destination Choice
Barros, C. P., Butler, R. W., & Correia, A. (2008) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287508321200 · Cited by 46
German Car Buyers' Willingness to Pay to Reduce Co2 EmissionsPreprint
Achtnicht, M. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1503412 · Cited by 46
Comparing the Effects of Vehicle Automation, Policy-Making and Changed User Preferences on the Uptake of Electric Cars and Emissions from Transport
Mazur, C., Offer, G. J., Contestabile, M., & Brandon, N. P. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030676 · Cited by 49
Chinese students and higher education destinations: Findings from a choice experiment
Gong, X., & Huybers, T. (2015) · Australian Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/0004944115584482 · Cited by 45
Quantifying patient preferences for systemic atopic dermatitis treatments using a discrete-choice experiment
Boeri, M., Sutphin, J., Hauber, B., Cappelleri, J. C., Romero, W., & Bonaventura, M. D. (2020) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1832185 · Cited by 46
Modeling the Modal Shift towards a More Sustainable Transport by Stated Preference in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Youssef, Z., Alshuwaikhat, H. M., & Reza, I. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13010337 · Cited by 46
Valuing QALYs in Relation to Equity Considerations Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
van de Wetering, L., van Exel, J. N. A., Bobinac, A., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2015) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-015-0311-x · Cited by 45
Revealing additional preference heterogeneity with an extended random parameter logit model: the case of extra virgin olive oil
Yangui, A., Costa‐Font, M., & Roig, J. M. G. (2014) · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.5424/sjar/2014123-5501 · Cited by 45
The Relationship Between Bus Contract Costs, User Perceived Service Quality and Performance Assessment
Hensher, D. A. (2013) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.758454 · Cited by 44
Self-citation
Beef Credence Attributes: Implications of Substitution Effects on Consumers’ WTP
Viegas, I., Nunes, L. C., Madureira, L., Fontes, M. A., & Santos, J. L. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12067 · Cited by 44
Women’s Preferences for Aspects of Labor Management: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment
Scotland, G., McNamee, P., Cheyne, H., et al. (2010) · Birth · doi:10.1111/j.1523-536x.2010.00447.x · Cited by 44
Customer value of purchasable supplementary services: The case of a European full network carrier's economy class
Wittmer, A., & Rowley, E. (2013) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.07.002 · Cited by 49
Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment
Marti, J. (2011) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-011-0333-z · Cited by 47
Using choice experiments to value catchment and estuary health in Tasmania with individual preference heterogeneity*
Kragt, M. E., & Bennett, J. (2011) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00533.x · Cited by 44
The choice and preference for public-private health care among urban residents in China: evidence from a discrete choice experiment
Tang, C., Xu, J., & Zhang, M. (2016) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1829-0 · Cited by 45
Patients’ priorities in selecting chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatments
Mansfield, C. A., Masaquel, A. S., Sutphin, J., Weiss, E. S., Gutierrez, M. E., Wilson, J., Boeri, M., Li, J., & Reyes, C. M. (2017) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2017007294 · Cited by 44
Chinese Outbound Tourist Preferences for All-Inclusive Group Package Tours: A Latent Class Choice Model
Chen, N., Masiero, L., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2018) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287518794331 · Cited by 44
Do consumers value hydroponics? Implications for organic certification
Gilmour, D., Bazzani, C., Nayga, R. M., & Snell, H. A. (2019) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12519 · Cited by 48
Estimating Tourist Externalities on Residents: A Choice Modeling Approach to the Case of RiminiPreprint
Figini, P., Castellani, M., & Vici, L. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.999927 · Cited by 44
Total Economic Valuation of the National Park Service Lands and Programs: Results of a Survey of the American Public
Haefele, M., Loomis, J. B., & Bilmes, L. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2821124 · Cited by 44
Is there a promising market ‘in between’ organic and conventional food? Analysis of consumer preferences
Janßen, M., Heid, A., & Hamm, U. (2009) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170509990056 · Cited by 43
Reimagining cost recovery in Pakistan's irrigation system through willingness‐to‐pay estimates for irrigation water from a discrete choice experiment
Bell, A. R., Shah, M. A. A., & Ward, P. S. (2014) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr015704 · Cited by 47
Generating electricity with forest biomass: Consistency and payment timeframe effects in choice experiments
Soliño, M., Farizo, B. Á., Rodríguez, M. X. V., & Prada, A. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.048 · Cited by 44
Product differentiation by marketing and processing cooperatives: A choice experiment with cheese and cereal products
Grashuis, J., & Magnier, A. (2018) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.21551 · Cited by 43
Summarizing Patient Preferences for the Competitive Landscape of Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Options
Jonker, M. F., Donkers, B., Goossens, L. M. A., et al. (2020) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19897944 · Cited by 43
Analyzing German consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity tariff attributes: a discrete choice experiment
Danne, M., Sauthoff, S., & Mußhoff, O. (2021) · Energy Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-021-00291-8 · Cited by 44
E-Groceries: A Channel Choice Analysis in Shanghai
Gatta, V., Marcucci, E., Maltese, I., Iannaccone, G., & Fan, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13073625 · Cited by 43
Public Acceptability of Low Emission Zones: The Case of “Madrid Central”
Tarriño-Ortiz, J., Soria-Lara, J. A., Gómez, J., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13063251 · Cited by 43
Stated Preferences for Plant-Based and Cultured Meat: A Choice Experiment Study of Spanish Consumers
Escribano, A. J., Peña, M. B., Caro, C. D., Elghannam, A., Cebada, E. C., & Díaz, F. J. M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13158235 · Cited by 53
Evaluation of demand for different trip purposes under various congestion pricing scenarios
Azari, K. A., Arintono, S., Hamid, H., & Davoodi, S. R. (2013) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.01.001 · Cited by 44
The Reform of Support Mechanisms for Upland Farming: Paying for Public Goods in the Severely Disadvantaged Areas of England
Hanley, N. D., Colombo, S., Mason, P. A., et al. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00114.x · Cited by 43
Valuing irrigation water using a choice experiment: an ‘individual status quo’ modelling of farm specific water scarcity
Barton, D. N., & Bergland, O. (2010) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x10000045 · Cited by 46
Young People’s Preferences for Family Planning Service Providers in Rural Malawi: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Michaels-Igbokwe, C., Terris‐Prestholt, F., Lagarde, M., Chipeta, E. K., Initiative, T. I., & Cairns, J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143287 · Cited by 43
Are some QALYs more equal than others?
van de Wetering, E. J., van Exel, J. N. A., Rose, J. M., Hoefman, R., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2014) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-014-0657-6 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Student Swirl at a Single Institution: The Role of Timing and Student Characteristics
Johnson, I. Y., & Muse, W. B. (2012) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9253-0 · Cited by 42
How many choice sets and alternatives are optimal? Consistency in choice experiments
Chung, C., Boyer, T. A., & Han, S. (2010) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.20252 · Cited by 42
Random Regret-Based Discrete-Choice Modelling: An Application to Healthcare
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., & Chorus, C. G. (2013) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0059-0 · Cited by 43
Men's preferences and trade‐offs for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
Howard, K., Salkeld, G. P., Patel, M. I., Mann, G. J., & Pignone, M. P. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12301 · Cited by 41
Modelling asymmetric preferences for water quality in choice experiments with individual-specific status quo alternatives
Ahtiainen, H., Pouta, E., & Artell, J. V. (2015) · Water Resources and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.wre.2015.10.003 · Cited by 44
Consumer’s Preference and Willingness to Pay for Apple Attributes: A Choice Experiment in Large Retail Outlets in Bologna (Italy)
Ceschi, S., Canavari, M., & Castellini, A. (2017) · Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · doi:10.1080/08974438.2017.1413614 · Cited by 42
Designing Unforced Choice Experiments to Inform Health Care Decision Making: Implications of Using Opt-Out, Neither, or Status Quo Alternatives in Discrete Choice Experiments
Determann, D., Gyrd‐Hansen, D., de Wit, G. A., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Steyerberg, E. W., Lambooij, M., & Pedersen, L. B. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19862275 · Cited by 45
Practical Issues in Conducting a Discrete Choice Experiment
Ryan, M., Gerard, K., Watson, V., Street, D. J., & Burgess, L. (2007) · The Economics of non-market goods and resources · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5753-3_3 · Cited by 44
Heterogeneity in preferences for renewable home heating systems among Irish households
Meles, T. H., Ryan, L., & Mukherjee, S. C. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118219 · Cited by 40
Patient Preferences for Injectable Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
Poulos, C. M., Kinter, E. T., Yang, J., Bridges, J. F. P., Posner, J., & Reder, A. T. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0136-x · Cited by 42
Right-Angle Crash Vulnerability of Motorcycles at Signalized Intersections
Haque, M. M., & Chin, H. C. (2010) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2194-10 · Cited by 41
Patients rank toxicity against progression free survival in second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma
Wong, M. K. K., Mohamed, A. F., Hauber, B., Yang, J., Liu, Z., Rogerio, J. W., & Garay, C. A. (2012) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.3111/13696998.2012.708689 · Cited by 41
Patient preferences for HIV/AIDS therapy - a discrete choice experiment
Mühlbacher, A. C., Stoll, M., Mahlich, J., et al. (2013) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/2191-1991-3-14 · Cited by 41
High-speed railway scheduling based on user preferences
Espinosa-Aranda, J. L., Garćıa-Ródenas, R., Ramírez-Flores, M. D. C., López-Garćıa, M. L., & Angulo, E. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.052 · Cited by 41
Economic evaluation of environmental externalities in China’s coal-fired power generation
Zhao, X., Cai, Q., Ma, C., et al. (2016) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.030 · Cited by 41
The effects of perceived regulatory efficacy, ethnocentrism and food safety concern on the demand for organic food
Ahangarkolaee, S. S., & Gorton, M. (2020) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12619 · Cited by 41
Travel Demand Prediction during COVID-19 Pandemic: Educational and Working Trips at the University of Padova
Ceccato, R., Rossi, R., & Gastaldi, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126596 · Cited by 43
Shipper Preferences Suggest Strong Mistrust of Rail
Patterson, Z., Ewing, G. O., & Haider, M. (2007) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2008-09 · Cited by 41
Avoidance of weight gain is important for oral type 2 diabetes treatments in Sweden and Germany: Patient preferences
Mohamed, A. F., Zhang, J., Johnson, F. R., Duprat-Lomon, I., Malvolti, E., Townsend, R., Östgren, C. J., & Parhofer, K. G. (2013) · Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2013.06.001 · Cited by 43
Interdependency Among Addictive Behaviours and Time/Risk Preferences: Discrete Choice Model Analysis of Smoking, Drinking, and Gambling
Ida, T., & Goto, R. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_7 · Cited by 41
A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Hauber, B., Tunceli, K., Yang, J., Gantz, I., Brodovicz, K. G., Alexander, C. M., Davies, M. J., & Radican, L. (2015) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0094-2 · Cited by 40
The Willingness to Pay for Reducing Pain and Pain-Related Disability
Chuck, A. W., Adamowicz, W., Jacobs, P., Öhinmaa, A., Dick, B., & Rashiq, S. (2008) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00457.x · Cited by 42
Using discrete choice experiments to value preferences for air quality improvement: the case of curbing haze in urban China
Tang, C., & Zhang, Y. E. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1079518 · Cited by 40
Market strategy for promoting green consumption: Consumer preference and policy implications for laundry detergent
Jo, M., & Shin, J. (2017) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12339 · Cited by 40
Farmers’ Preferences for PES Contracts to Adopt Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Ecuador, Revealed Through a Choice Experiment
Raes, L., Speelman, S., & Aguirre, N. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0876-6 · Cited by 41
Commuter travel cost estimation at different levels of crowding in a suburban rail system: a case study of Mumbai
Sahu, P. K., Sharma, G., & Guharoy, A. (2018) · Public Transport · doi:10.1007/s12469-018-0190-6 · Cited by 41
Are Malaysian airline passengers willing to pay to offset carbon emissions?
Shaari, N. F., Abdul‐Rahim, A. S., & Afandi, S. H. M. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08662-y · Cited by 40
Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients’ Preferences and Personalize Care
Al‐Omari, B., Farhat, J., & Ershaid, M. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12020274 · Cited by 48
Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care
Flynn, T. N., Bilger, M., Malhotra, C., & Finkelstein, E. A. (2015) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-015-0338-z · Cited by 39
Sad or Happy? The Effects of Emotions on Stated Preferences for Environmental Goods
Hanley, N. D., Boyce, C. J., Czajkowski, M., Tucker, S. J., NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Townsend, M. (2016) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0048-9 · Cited by 46
Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment
Whitty, J. A., Spinks, J., Bucknall, T. K., Tobiano, G., & Chaboyer, W. P. (2016) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12513 · Cited by 39
Efficacy is Not Everything: Eliciting Women’s Preferences for a Vaginal HIV Prevention Product Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment
Browne, E. N., Montgomery, E., Mansfield, C. A., Boeri, M., Mange, B., Beksinska, M. E., Schwartz, J. L., Clark, M. R., Doncel, G. F., Smit, J. A., et al. (2019) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-019-02715-1 · Cited by 39
How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment
van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2020) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-020-09833-2 · Cited by 39
Does It Matter Who Verifies Production-Derived Quality?
Innes, B., & Hobbs, J. E. (2010) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.2010.01194.x · Cited by 39
Should all Choices Count? Using the Cut-Offs Approach to Edit Responses in a Choice Experiment
Bush, G., Colombo, S., & Hanley, N. D. (2009) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9292-6 · Cited by 39
The Effects of Changing Cost Vectors on Choices and Scale Heterogeneity
Kragt, M. E. (2012) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-012-9587-x · Cited by 39
Spatial heterogeneity of preferences for improvements in river basin ecosystem services and its validity for benefit transfer
Khan, I., Zhao, M., Khan, S. U., et al. (2018) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.018 · Cited by 39
Assessing Consumer and Producer Preferences for Animal Welfare Using a Common Elicitation Format
Latacz‐Lohmann, U., & Schreiner, J. (2018) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12297 · Cited by 38
Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature
Naik-Panvelkar, P., Armour, C. L., & Saini, B. (2012) · International Journal of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1111/ijpp.12002 · Cited by 38
Investigation of Factors that Stimulate Car Drivers to Change from Car to Carpooling in City Center Oriented Work Trips
van der Waerden, P., Lem, A., & Schaefer, W. (2015) · Transportation research procedia · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.083 · Cited by 38
Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care: a discrete choice experiment
Gerard, K., Tinelli, M., Latter, S. M., Smith, A. J., & Blenkinsopp, A. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12193 · Cited by 38
Assessing Tourists' Multi-Attribute Preferences for Public Beach Access
Oh, C., Draper, J., & Dixon, A. W. (2009) · Coastal Management · doi:10.1080/08920750802701128 · Cited by 38
Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together? The Impact of Ethnic Segregation Preferences on Neighbourhood Choice
Ibraimovic, T., & Masiero, L. (2013) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098013493026 · Cited by 38
Paying for Forest Ecosystem Services: Voluntary Versus Mandatory Payments
Roesch-McNally, G. E., & Rabotyagov, S. S. (2015) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-015-0641-7 · Cited by 38
How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment
Marshall, D. A., Deal, K., Bombard, Y., Leighl, N. B., MacDonald, K. V., & Trudeau, M. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010981 · Cited by 38
Steering short-term demand for car-sharing: a mode choice and policy impact analysis by trip distance
Li, W., & Kamargianni, M. (2019) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-019-10010-0 · Cited by 37
Are Shareholders Willing to Pay for Financial, Social and Environmental Disclosure? A Choice-based Experiment
de Villiers, C., Cho, C. H., Turner, M. J., & Scarpa, R. (2021) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2021.1944890 · Cited by 38
Influence of the weather on mode choice in corridors with time-varying congestion: a mixed data study
Anta, J., Pérez-López, J.-B., Martínez-Pardo, A., et al. (2015) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-015-9578-1 · Cited by 38
Willingness-to-Pay and Preference Heterogeneity for Rural Bus Attributes
Phanikumar, C. V., & Maitra, B. (2006) · Journal of Transportation Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2007)133:1(62 · Cited by 38
Designing a package of sexual and reproductive health and HIV outreach services to meet the heterogeneous preferences of young people in Malawi: results from a discrete choice experiment
Initiative, T. I., Michaels-Igbokwe, C., Lagarde, M., Cairns, J., & Terris‐Prestholt, F. (2015) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-015-0046-6 · Cited by 39
Receivers’ willingness-to-adopt novel urban goods distribution practices
dell’Olio, L., Moura, J. L., Ibeas, Á., Cordera, R., & Holguín‐Veras, J. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.026 · Cited by 44
Strategic demand forecasts for the tablet PC market using the Bayesian mixed logit model and market share simulations
Choi, J. Y., Shin, J., & Lee, J. (2012) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.634435 · Cited by 38
Patients’ preferences for bone metastases treatments in France, Germany and the United Kingdom
Hechmati, G., Hauber, B., Arellano, J., Mohamed, A. F., Qian, Y., Gatta, F., Haynes, I., Bahl, A., von Moos, R., & Body, J. (2014) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2309-x · Cited by 39
What do commuters think travel time reliability is worth? Calculating economic value of reducing the frequency and extent of unexpected delays
Sikka, N., & Hanley, P. F. (2012) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9448-z · Cited by 37
Exploring Heterogeneous Preference for Farmland Non-market Values in Wuhan, Central China
Yang, X. H., Burton, M. P., Cai, Y., et al. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8010012 · Cited by 37
Sustainable intensification of beef production in Colombia—Chances for product differentiation and price premiums
Charry, A., Narjes, M., Enciso, K., Peters, M., & Burkart, S. (2019) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-019-0143-7 · Cited by 36
Comparing Willingness to Pay for Improved Drinking-Water Quality Using Stated Preference Methods in Rural and Urban Kenya
Brouwer, R., Job, F. C., van der Kroon, B., & Johnston, R. B. (2014) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-014-0137-2 · Cited by 37

Authors: Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H.
Affiliations: The University of Sydney (AU)
New York University (US)
ORCID: Hensher, David A.
Rose, John M.
Greene, William H.
Venue: Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Published: 2005-06-02
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511610356
OpenAlex: W3152367353
Cited by: 1,823
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 62 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 98
FWCI: 34.17
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 2652 d)
Locations: Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords: discrete choice models, multinomial logistic regression, nested logit model, mixed logit, discrete choice experiment, choice experiment design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks