The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer
Abstract
Almost without exception, everything human beings undertake involves a choice. In recent years there has been a growing interest in the development and application of quantitative statistical methods to study choices made by individuals with the purpose of gaining a better understanding both of how choices are made and of forecasting future choice responses. In this primer the authors provide an unintimidating introduction to the main techniques of choice analysis and include detail on themes such as data collection and preparation, model estimation and interpretation and the design of choice experiments. A companion website to the book provides practice data sets and software to estimate the main discrete choice models such as multinomial logit, nested logit and mixed logit. This primer will be an invaluable resource to students as well as of immense value to consultants and professionals, researchers and anyone else interested in choice analysis and modelling.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Key results are presented and interpreted for the MIXL models (Model 3 and Model 4), based on goodness of fit statistics (McFadden pseudo-R-squared, Akaike and Bayesian information criteria).”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Here, we use a mixed-logit model (MMNL) which offers advantages to the more often used multinominal logit (MNL) [32,33].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
Sarkhel, P., Banerjee, S., & Banerjee, S. (2015) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-015-9659-5 · Cited by 19
Willingness to pay for kerbside recycling in Brisbane, Australia
Gillespie, R., & Bennett, J. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.681033 · Cited by 19
Kumar, R., Tomkins, A., Vassilvitskii, S., & Vee, E. (2015) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/2684822.2685310 · Cited by 19
Willingness-to-Pay for Calf Health Programs and Certification Agents
Schumacher, T., Schroeder, T. C., & Tonsor, G. T. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · doi:10.1017/s1074070800000262 · Cited by 21
Cerda, C., Barkmann, J., & Marggraf, R. (2012) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x12000472 · Cited by 19
Eder, R., & Arnberger, A. (2016) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1117063 · Cited by 18
Assessing visitors’ preferences for ecosystem features in a desert biodiversity hotspot
Cerda, C., Fuentes, J. P., de la Maza, C. L., et al. (2017) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892917000200 · Cited by 19
Designing community-based payment scheme for ecosystem services: a case from Koshi Hills, Nepal
Bhatta, L. D., Khadgi, A., Kumar, R., et al. (2017) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-017-9969-x · Cited by 19
Wang, N.-N., Luo, L., Pan, Y.-R., & Ni, X.-M. (2018) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0109-z · Cited by 21
Analysing knowledge sharing behaviour in business centres: a mixed multinomial logit model
Weijs-Perrée, M., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2020) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2019.1664269 · Cited by 18
Strauss, M., George, G., Mantell, J. E., Mapingure, M. P., Masvawure, T. B., Lamb, M. R., Zech, J. M., Musuka, G., Chingombe, I., Msukwa, M., et al. (2020) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-020-02994-z · Cited by 21
Households’ willingness to pay and preferences for improved cook stoves in Ethiopia
Bersisa, M., Heshmati, A., & Mekonnen, A. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14790-w · Cited by 19
Investigating demand for biofortified seeds in developing countries
Birol, E., Asare‐Marfo, D., Karandikar, B., et al. (2015) · Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jadee-02-2014-0008 · Cited by 19
Kloos, J., & Baumert, N. (2014) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1475-y · Cited by 19
Jones, S., & Hensher, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Business Finance & Accounting · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02049.x · Cited by 19
Self-citationPublic values for badgers, bovine TB reduction and management strategies
Bennett, R. M., & Willis, K. G. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640560802116996 · Cited by 19
Constant-Sum Paired Comparisons for Eliciting Stated Preferences: A Tutorial
Skedgel, C. D., & Regier, D. A. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0077-9 · Cited by 20
Determann, D., Lambooij, M., Gyrd‐Hansen, D., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Steyerberg, E. W., Heldoorn, M., Pedersen, L. B., & de Wit, G. A. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw158 · Cited by 19
Kim, H. N. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10040959 · Cited by 18
Substitution Effects in Spatial Discrete Choice Experiments
Schaafsma, M., & Brouwer, R. (2019) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-019-00368-1 · Cited by 18
Phisalprapa, P., Ngorsuraches, S., Wanishayakorn, T., Kositamongkol, C., Supakankunti, S., & Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2021) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2021.1877145 · Cited by 18
Zhu, L. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127720 · Cited by 18
Grilli, G., Ferrini, S., Luisetti, T., & Turner, R. K. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2021.1957794 · Cited by 17
Simons, G., Veldwijk, J., DiSantostefano, R. L., Englbrecht, M., Radawski, C., Bywall, K. S., Valor, L., Hauber, B., Raza, K., & Falahee, M. (2022) · Lara D. Veeken · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keac397 · Cited by 18
Stiletto, A., & Trestini, S. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277048 · Cited by 18
Smith, I. P., Whichello, C. L., Veldwijk, J., Mölken, M. R., Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, C. G. M., Vos, R. C., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., & de Wit, G. A. (2023) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003025 · Cited by 20
Patient preferences for atopic dermatitis treatments: a discrete choice experiment
Kwatra, S. G., Lio, P., Weidinger, S., Calimlim, B., Ladizinski, B., Vigna, N., Botha, W., & Mansfield, C. A. (2023) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2023.2222201 · Cited by 18
Hansford, H. J., Jones, M. D., Cashin, A. G., Ostelo, R., Chiarotto, A., Williams, S. A., Sharma, S., Rose, J. M., Devonshire, J. J., Ferraro, M. C., et al. (2024) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12279 · Cited by 18
Self-citationUsing a Choice Experiment to Improve Decision Support Tool Design
Kragt, M. E., & Llewellyn, R. S. (2014) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppu001 · Cited by 18
Community Preferences for the Allocation & Donation of Organs - The PAraDOx Study
Howard, K., Jan, S., Rose, J. M., Chadban, S. J., Allen, R. D. M., Irving, M. J., Tong, A., Wong, G., Craig, J. C., & Cass, A. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-386 · Cited by 13
Self-citationUsing augmented reality to inform consumer choice and lower carbon footprints
Isley, S., Ketcham, R., & Arent, D. J. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa6def · Cited by 21
A latent class model of residential choice behaviour and ethnic segregation preferences
Ibraimovic, T., & Hess, S. (2017) · Housing Studies · doi:10.1080/02673037.2017.1373749 · Cited by 18
Mixed-use development in Christchurch, New Zealand: Do you want to live there?
Kusumastuti, D., & Nicholson, A. (2017) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098017725475 · Cited by 18
Accounting for implicit and explicit payment vehicles in a discrete choice experiment
Talpur, M. A., Koetse, M. J., & Brouwer, R. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1080/21606544.2018.1450789 · Cited by 18
Injury Severity of Truck Drivers in Crashes at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings in the United States
Khan, W. A., & Khattak, A. J. (2018) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/0361198118781183 · Cited by 18
Chinese Muslim’s choice of halal products: evidence from stated preference data
Hong, M., Sun, S., Beg, A. B. M. R. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy · doi:10.1080/13547860.2019.1701827 · Cited by 18
Consumers’ Preference Heterogeneity for GM and Organic Food Products in Germany
Emberger‐Klein, A., Zapilko, M., & Menrad, K. (2015) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.21439 · Cited by 18
Cerda, C. (2012) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2549-5 · Cited by 18
Baskaran, R., Cullen, R., & Takatsuka, Y. (2009) · Australasian Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1080/14486563.2009.9725224 · Cited by 18
Using choice‐based‐experiments to support real estate design decisions
Duarte, C. R. M., & Lineros, M. A. R. (2013) · Journal of European real estate research · doi:10.1108/17539261311312979 · Cited by 18
Lourenço‐Gomes, L., Pinto, L. M. C., & Rebelo, J. F. (2013) · Journal of Applied Economics · doi:10.1016/s1514-0326(13)60013-6 · Cited by 19
Arnberger, A., Haider, W., Eder, R., & Muhar, A. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.490045 · Cited by 18
Meyerhoff, J., Dehnhardt, A., & Hartje, V. J. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640560903399863 · Cited by 18
To switch travel mode or not? Impact of Smartphone delivered high‐quality multimodal information
Gan, H. (2014) · IET Intelligent Transport Systems · doi:10.1049/iet-its.2014.0150 · Cited by 18
Baji, P., García‐Goñi, M., Gulàcsi, L., Mentzakis, E., & Paolucci, F. (2015) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-015-0721-x · Cited by 22
Waste minimisation at a Welsh university: A viability study using choice modelling
Harris, B. K., & Probert, E. J. (2009) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.12.008 · Cited by 20
Gillespie, R., & Kragt, M. E. (2012) · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis · doi:10.1515/2152-2812.1101 · Cited by 18
How Do Golf Tourists Manage Golfing Constraints? A Choice Modeling Approach
Lyu, S. O., & Lee, Y. (2015) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/1096348015597036 · Cited by 18
Hjerpe, E. E., & Hussain, A. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-08122-210208 · Cited by 22
Altobelli, F., Lall, U., Marta, A. D., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859618000588 · Cited by 18
Kessels, R., Herck, P. V., Dancet, E. A. F., Annemans, L., & Sermeus, W. (2015) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0847-7 · Cited by 21
Abbasi, M., Piccioni, C., Sierpiński, G., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14031692 · Cited by 17
Farmers' preferences for East African highland cooking banana 'Matooke' hybrids and local cultivars
Madalla, N. A., Swennen, R. L., Brown, A., Carpentier, S., den Bergh, I. V., Crichton, R. J., Marimo, P., Weltzien, E., Massawe, C., Shimwela, M. M., et al. (2023) · Agriculture & Food Security · doi:10.1186/s40066-023-00407-7 · Cited by 22
Bimonte, S., Ferrini, S., & Grilli, G. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1044746 · Cited by 17
The value of scientific information on climate change: a choice experiment on Rokua esker, Finland
Koundouri, P., Kougea, E., Stithou, M., et al. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1080/21606544.2011.647450 · Cited by 17
Arentze, T., Dellaert, B. G. C., & Chorus, C. G. (2014) · Transportation Science · doi:10.1287/trsc.2013.0513 · Cited by 17
Insights into public preferences for pharmaceutical funding
Whitty, J. A., Rundle-Thiele, S. R., & Scuffham, P. (2008) · International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing · doi:10.1108/17506120810903980 · Cited by 17
Whitty, J. A., Ratcliffe, J., Kendall, E. A., Burton, P., Wilson, A. J., Littlejohns, P., Harris, P., Krinks, R., & Scuffham, P. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008919 · Cited by 19
What factors drive heterogeneity of preferences for micro-health insurance in rural Malawi?
Abiiro, G. A., Torbica, A., Kwalamasa, K., & Allegri, M. D. (2016) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czw049 · Cited by 19
Saldías, C., Speelman, S., Drechsel, P., et al. (2016) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0824-3 · Cited by 17
Railway station choice modelling: a review of methods and evidence
Young, M., & Blainey, S. P. (2017) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1326537 · Cited by 19
Shin, J.-H., & Lyu, S. O. (2018) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.smr.2018.06.009 · Cited by 17
Tempesta, T., & Vecchiato, D. (2018) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources7040086 · Cited by 17
Lee, C.-L., Wang, C.-H., Lee, C., et al. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11113149 · Cited by 17
Topological rationality of supply chain networks
Perera, S., Kasthurirathna, D., Bell, M. G. H., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1630763 · Cited by 17
Public preferences for the management of different invasive alien forest taxa
Japelj, A., Veenvliet, J. K., Malovrh, J., et al. (2019) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-019-02052-3 · Cited by 17
Understanding the Transit Market: A Persona-Based Approach for Preferences Quantification
Eldeeb, G., & Mohamed, M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12093863 · Cited by 17
Wong, X. Y., Lim, A. Q. J., Shen, Q., Chia, J. W.-K., Chew, M. H., Tan, W. S., & Wee, H. L. (2020) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2020.1790348 · Cited by 17
Dissecting subjective discount rates and investment literacy for energy-efficient investments
Damigos, D., Kontogianni, A. D., Tourkolias, C., & Skourtos, M. (2021) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-021-09941-4 · Cited by 16
Pakalniete, K., Ahtiainen, H., Aigars, J., Puriņa, I., Armoškaitė, A., Hansen, H. S., & Strāķe, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131810121 · Cited by 17
How Choice Experiment Design Affects Estimated Valuation of Use of Gestation Crates
Pozo, V. F., Tonsor, G. T., & Schroeder, T. C. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00349.x · Cited by 17
Siderelis, C., Naber, M., & Leung, Y. (2010) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.2010.11950219 · Cited by 17
Preferences for tourist information centres in the ubiquitous information environment
Lyu, S. O., & Lee, H. (2014) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2014.912205 · Cited by 17
Designing a socially efficient cultural policy: the case of municipal theaters in Warsaw
Wiśniewska, A., & Czajkowski, M. (2017) · International Journal of Cultural Policy · doi:10.1080/10286632.2017.1308504 · Cited by 17
Modelling building users’ space preferences for group work: a discrete-choice experiment
Cha, S. H., Steemers, K., & Kim, T. W. (2017) · Architectural Science Review · doi:10.1080/00038628.2017.1363706 · Cited by 17
Conservation agriculture in Ecuador’s highlands: a discrete choice experiment
Barrowclough, M. J., & Alwang, J. (2017) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-017-0011-0 · Cited by 18
Barreiro‐Hurlé, J., & Gómez-Limón, J. A. (2007) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9169-5 · Cited by 17
Gao, S., Grebitus, C., & DeLong, K. L. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/cjag.12359 · Cited by 16
Yang, F., Chen, L., Cheng, Y., et al. (2014) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2014.986438 · Cited by 16
Tourists’ Preferences for Stargazing Land Resources
Hernández, C. F., Araña, J. E., Ledesma, J. D. L., et al. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11020198 · Cited by 16
What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers
Arnoldussen, F., Koetse, M. J., de Bruyn, S. M., & Kuik, O. J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142114299 · Cited by 16
Kaufman, J., Tuckerman, J., Bonner, C., et al. (2024) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2024.2359623 · Cited by 16
Kinter, E. T., Prior, T. J., Carswell, C., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2012) · Patient · doi:10.1007/bf03262499 · Cited by 16
Can economic-psychological parameters predict successful smoking cessation?
Ida, T., Goto, R., Takahashi, Y., & Nishimura, S. (2011) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2011.01.005 · Cited by 16
Kauf, T. L., Mohamed, A. F., Hauber, B., Fetzer, D., & Ahmad, A. (2012) · Patient · doi:10.1007/bf03262498 · Cited by 17
The Role of Fairness in Modelling Customer Choice
Mathies, C., & Gudergan, S. P. (2010) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.11.002 · Cited by 16
How to value protection from natural hazards – a step-by-step discrete choice approach
Olschewski, R. (2013) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-13-913-2013 · Cited by 16
Malpica‐Cruz, L., Haider, W., Smith, N. S., Fernández-Lozada, S., & Côté, I. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00138 · Cited by 17
Jin, W., Jiang, H., Liu, Y., & Klampfl, E. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178826 · Cited by 16
Consumers’ willingness to pay for reprocessed fried chicken: A way of reducing uneaten food
Kawata, Y., & Kubota, S. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.015 · Cited by 17
Public preferences for improved urban waste management: a choice experiment
Tarfasa, S., & Brouwer, R. (2018) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x17000432 · Cited by 16
Does an expanded brand user base of co-branded advertising help ad-memorability?
Nguyen, C., Romaniuk, J., Faulkner, M., & Cohen, E. (2018) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/1470785318762682 · Cited by 16
Mühlbacher, A. C., Sadler, A., & Juhnke, C. (2021) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-021-01264-6 · Cited by 16
Geda, S. A., & Kühl, R. W. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13052786 · Cited by 16
End user preferences for USDA market information
Pruitt, J. R., Tonsor, G. T., Brooks, K. R., & Johnson, R. J. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.04.008 · Cited by 16
Ex Ante Appraisal of Agricultural Research and Extension
Lambrecht, I. B., Vranken, L., Merckx, R., et al. (2015) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.5367/oa.2015.0199 · Cited by 16
Factors affecting mode choice for the home–elementary school journey: Evidence from Halifax, Canada
Spinney, J. E. L., Maoh, H. F., & Millward, H. A. (2018) · Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · doi:10.1111/cag.12494 · Cited by 16
Liski, A. H., Koetse, M. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2019) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-018-01458-4 · Cited by 16
Rivas, C. A., Tkacz, D., Antao, L., Mentzakis, E., Gordon, M., Anstee, S., & Giordano, R. (2019) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr07230 · Cited by 20
Comparative study on mode split discrete choice models
Chen, X., Liu, X., & Li, F. (2013) · 西南交通大学学报:英文版 · doi:10.1007/s40534-013-0028-5 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2005-06-02
- OpenAlex
- W3152367353
- Cited by
- 1,823
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 98
- FWCI
- 34.17
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- discrete choice models, multinomial logistic regression, nested logit model, mixed logit, discrete choice experiment, choice experiment design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review