The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer
Abstract
Almost without exception, everything human beings undertake involves a choice. In recent years there has been a growing interest in the development and application of quantitative statistical methods to study choices made by individuals with the purpose of gaining a better understanding both of how choices are made and of forecasting future choice responses. In this primer the authors provide an unintimidating introduction to the main techniques of choice analysis and include detail on themes such as data collection and preparation, model estimation and interpretation and the design of choice experiments. A companion website to the book provides practice data sets and software to estimate the main discrete choice models such as multinomial logit, nested logit and mixed logit. This primer will be an invaluable resource to students as well as of immense value to consultants and professionals, researchers and anyone else interested in choice analysis and modelling.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Key results are presented and interpreted for the MIXL models (Model 3 and Model 4), based on goodness of fit statistics (McFadden pseudo-R-squared, Akaike and Bayesian information criteria).”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Here, we use a mixed-logit model (MMNL) which offers advantages to the more often used multinominal logit (MNL) [32,33].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
Handling Individual Specific Availability of Alternatives in Stated Choice Experiments
Rose, J. M., & Hensher, D. A. (2006) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/9780080464015-018 · Cited by 16
Self-citationMarket and Non-Market Valuation of Renewable EnergyPreprint
Mamkhezri, J. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4238021 · Cited by 14
Investigating preferences for soil-based ecosystem services
Bartkowski, B., Massenberg, J. R., & Lienhoop, N. (2022) · Q Open · doi:10.1093/qopen/qoac035 · Cited by 14
Accommodating Risk Attitudes in Freight Transport Behaviour Research
Li, Z., & Hensher, D. A. (2012) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2011.645906 · Cited by 16
Self-citationSaposnik, G., Andhavarapu, S., Fernández, Ó., Kim, H. J., Wiendl, H., Foss, M. M., Zuo, F., Havrdová, E., Celius, E. G., Cáceres, F., et al. (2021) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2021.103389 · Cited by 15
Schleich, J. E., Guetlein, M.-C., Tu, G., et al. (2022) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2022.2030043 · Cited by 15
A global analysis of coral reef conservation preferences
Robinson, P. J., van Beukering, P. J. H., & Brander, L. (2023) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-023-01213-6 · Cited by 15
Microplastics in seafood: Consumer preferences and valuation for mitigation technologies
Barrientos, M., Lavín, F. V., Oliva, R. D. P., Nayga, R. M., & Gelcich, S. (2024) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114342 · Cited by 18
Rice farmers’ preferences for seed quality, packaging, and source: A study from northern Bangladesh
Sarkar, M. A. R., Habib, M. A., Sarker, M. R., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0306059 · Cited by 15
Nguyen, T. C., & Robinson, J. (2013) · Meteorological Applications · doi:10.1002/met.1441 · Cited by 15
Franco, M. R., Ferreira, M. L., Howard, K., Sherrington, C., Rose, J. M., Haines, T. P., & Ferreira, P. H. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002355 · Cited by 15
Self-citationMühlbacher, A. C., Stoll, M., Mahlich, J., et al. (2013) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/2191-1991-3-30 · Cited by 15
A Microsimulation Model for E-Services in Cultural Heritage Tourism
Leeuwen, E. S. V., & Nijkamp, P. J. (2010) · Tourism Economics · doi:10.5367/000000010791305563 · Cited by 15
Practical Solutions for Sampling Alternatives in Large-Scale Models
Daly, A., Hess, S., & Dekker, T. (2014) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2429-16 · Cited by 15
Mastering Consumer Attitude and Sustainable Consumption in the Digital Age
Kasemsap, K. (2016) · Advances in marketing, customer relationship management, and e-services book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0746-8.ch002 · Cited by 15
Danso, G., Otoo, M., Linh, N., et al. (2017) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources6030030 · Cited by 15
Conrad, S. A., & Yates, D. N. (2018) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.031 · Cited by 17
Ostermann, J., Njau, B., Hobbie, A. M., Mtuy, T. B., Masaki, M., Shayo, A. M., van Zwetselaar, M., Masnick, M. F., Flaherty, B. P., Brown, D. S., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039313 · Cited by 14
Li, Z., Liu, K., & Wang, J. (2020) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000657 · Cited by 16
Gan, Y., Xu, T., NengRui, X., Xu, J., & Qiao, D. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041852 · Cited by 15
Analysis of Fatal Truck-Involved Work Zone Crashes in Florida: Application of Tree-Based Models
Gupta, R., Asgari, H., Azimi, G., et al. (2021) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981211033278 · Cited by 15
Stiletto, A., & Trestini, S. (2022) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2022-0107 · Cited by 15
Behavioral Modeling of Urban Freight Transport
Marcucci, E., & Gatta, V. (2013) · Ecoproduction · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31788-0_12 · Cited by 23
The Impacts of Elicitation Context on Stated Preferences for Agricultural Landscapes
Tinch, D., Colombo, S., & Hanley, N. D. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12080 · Cited by 15
Kallas, Z., Gómez-Limón, J. A., Arriaza, M., & Nekhay, O. (2011) · Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales · doi:10.7201/earn.2006.11.03 · Cited by 15
Forbes-Brown, S., Micheels, E. T., & Hobbs, J. E. (2016) · Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · doi:10.1080/08974438.2015.1054542 · Cited by 15
Engineered Resilience for Complex Systems as a Predictor for Cost Overruns
Roberts, B., Mazzuchi, T. A., & Sarkani, S. (2016) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21339 · Cited by 15
Heilig, M., Mallig, N., Hilgert, T., et al. (2017) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2669-04 · Cited by 15
Rai, R. K., Nepal, M., Bhatta, L. D., et al. (2017) · Water Economics and Policy · doi:10.1142/s2382624x18500029 · Cited by 15
Paul, P., Berlin, C., Maessen, M., & Valtonen, H. J. (2018) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2018.1444260 · Cited by 16
Determining patient preferences in a glaucoma service: A discrete choice experiment
Lu, T. C., Angell, B. J., Dunn, H., Ford, B., White, A. J. R., & Keay, L. J. (2019) · Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1111/ceo.13606 · Cited by 17
Willingness to pay of Nigerian poultry producers and feed millers for aflatoxin‐safe maize
Johnson, A. M., Abdoulaye, T., Ayedun, B., et al. (2019) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.21621 · Cited by 15
Identifying consumer decision‐making strategies using alternative methods
Zellman, E., Kaye‐Blake, W., & Abell, W. L. (2010) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522751011053635 · Cited by 17
Das, S. S., Maitra, B., & Boltze, M. (2009) · Journal of Transportation Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2009)135:6(330 · Cited by 15
Valuing a homeland security policy: Countermeasures for the threats from shoulder mounted missiles
Smith, V. K., Mansfield, C. A., & Clayton, L. J. (2009) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-009-9069-x · Cited by 15
Analyzing time sensitivity to discomfort in the Paris subway: an interval data model approach
de Lapparent, M., & Koning, M. (2015) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-015-9629-7 · Cited by 13
AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING COUNCILS ‘AT RISK’
Walker, R. G., & Jones, S. (2006) · Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy · doi:10.1111/j.1759-3441.2006.tb00407.x · Cited by 15
Variability, Noise, and Error in Decision Making Under Risk
Loomes, G. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch23 · Cited by 14
Johnson, F. R., Hauber, B., & Poulos, C. M. (2009) · doi:10.3768/rtipress.2009.rr.0009.0909 · Cited by 15
Woldemariam, G., Seyoum, A., & Ketema, M. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.996284 · Cited by 14
Sugiarto, S., Miwa, T., Sato, H., & Morikawa, T. (2015) · Urban Planning and Transport Research · doi:10.1080/21650020.2015.1037964 · Cited by 14
Quality of life and patient preferences: identification of subgroups of multiple sclerosis patients
Rosato, R., Testa, S., Oggero, A., Molinengo, G., & Bertolotto, A. (2015) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-0952-4 · Cited by 14
Valuing forest park attributes by giving consideration to the tourist satisfaction
Kang, N., Wang, E., & Yu, Y. (2018) · Tourism Economics · doi:10.1177/1354816618803272 · Cited by 14
Brinkmann, M., Diedrich, L., Krauth, C., Robra, B.-P., Stahmeyer, J. T., & Dreier, M. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042399 · Cited by 15
Vo, V., Nguyen, K., Whitty, J. A., & Comans, T. A. (2021) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-021-00688-8 · Cited by 14
Skedgel, C. D., Ralphs, E., Finn, E., et al. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00563-7 · Cited by 14
Modeling farmers' preference and willingness to pay for improved climate services in Rwanda
Tesfaye, A., Hansen, J., Kagabo, D. M., et al. (2022) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x22000286 · Cited by 14
An Overview of Data Collection in Health Preference Research
Özdemir, S., Quaife, M., Mohamed, A. F., & Norman, R. (2024) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-024-00695-6 · Cited by 16
Dekhili, S., & Achabou, M. A. (2013) · Économie rurale · doi:10.4000/economierurale.4002 · Cited by 14
Rationing Access to Protected Natural Areas: An Australian Case Study
Fleming, C. M., & Manning, M. (2014) · Tourism Economics · doi:10.5367/te.2014.0388 · Cited by 14
How student choice consistency affects the success of applications in Portuguese higher education
Sá, C., & Tavares, O. (2017) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1313219 · Cited by 14
Conrad, S. A., Rutherford, M. B., & Haider, W. (2017) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1666-x · Cited by 13
Kikuchi, Y. (2017) · JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN · doi:10.1252/jcej.16we374 · Cited by 14
Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment
Gingrich, C. D., Ricotta, E., Kahwa, A. M., et al. (2017) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1929-2 · Cited by 14
Majumdar, B. B., & Mitra, S. (2018) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-018-9898-z · Cited by 14
Yao, L., Deng, J., Johnston, R. J., Khan, I., & Zhao, M. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/cjag.12189 · Cited by 15
Carsharing-facilitating neighbourhood choice: a mixed logit model
Wang, J., Dane, G. Z., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2020) · Journal of Housing and the Built Environment · doi:10.1007/s10901-020-09791-z · Cited by 14
Adeel, A., Notteboom, B., Yasar, A.-U.-H., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126594 · Cited by 14
Ex-ante assessment of the cost-effectiveness of public policies to sequester carbon in soils
Blazy, J., Subervie, J., Paul, J., Causeret, F., Guindé, L., Moulla, S., Thomas, A., & Sierra, J. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107213 · Cited by 13
Robinson, P. J., & Botzen, W. J. W. (2021) · The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice · doi:10.1057/s41288-021-00248-0 · Cited by 16
Large carnivores and naturalness affect forest recreational value
Giergiczny, M., Swenson, J. E., Zedrosser, A., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17862-0 · Cited by 14
Tonin, S., Alberini, A., & Turvani, M. E. (2011) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01730.x · Cited by 14
Modeling Generalized Cost of Travel and Its Application for Improvement of Taxies in Kolkata
Chintakayala, P. K., & Maitra, B. (2010) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2010)136:1(42 · Cited by 14
Ammi, M., & Peyron, C. (2016) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-016-0121-7 · Cited by 14
Pan, D. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8070611 · Cited by 14
Essers, B. A. B., Arits, A. H. M. M., Hendriks, M., et al. (2017) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.15782 · Cited by 14
Revenue and attendance simultaneous optimization in performing arts organizations
Baldin, A., Bille, T., Ellero, A., & Favaretto, D. (2018) · Journal of Cultural Economics · doi:10.1007/s10824-018-9323-7 · Cited by 14
Consumers’ willingness to pay for beef products derived from RNA interference technology
Britton, L. L., & Tonsor, G. T. (2019) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.02.008 · Cited by 16
Poverty Dynamics in Vietnam, 2002-2006
Baulch, B., & Dat, V. H. (2010) · World Bank, Hanoi eBooks · doi:10.1596/27728 · Cited by 14
Zingmark, M., Björk, J., Granbom, M., Gefenaitė, G., Nordeström, F., Schmidt, S., Rantanen, T., Slaug, B., & Iwarsson, S. (2021) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/31137 · Cited by 22
Clustering Ranked Preference Data Using Sociodemographic Covariates
Gormley, I. C., & Murphy, T. B. (2010) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/9781849507738-025 · Cited by 14
Birol, E., & Das, S. (2012) · Urban Water Journal · doi:10.1080/1573062x.2012.660958 · Cited by 14
van der Waerden, P., Couwenberg, E., & Wets, G. (2018) · Public Transport · doi:10.1007/s12469-018-0189-z · Cited by 14
Ecosystem Services in the Baltic Sea
Ahtiainen, H., & Öhman, M. C. (2014) · doi:10.6027/tn2014-563 · Cited by 16
Ceccato, R., Baldassa, A., Orsini, F., et al. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15118690 · Cited by 13
Turmeric trends: analyzing consumer preferences and willingness to pay
Ly, N., Govindasamy, R., & Mentreddy, S. R. (2024) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1359040 · Cited by 20
Domínguez‐Torreiro, M. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.01.006 · Cited by 13
Pascoe, S. D., Innes, J., Norman‐López, A., et al. (2012) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2012.736941 · Cited by 13
Holopainen, J., Toppinen, A., Lähtinen, K., et al. (2017) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f8110431 · Cited by 13
Las preferencias de los consumidores por tortillas de maíz. El caso de Puebla, México
Garrido, J. S. E., & Villanueva, J. L. J. (2019) · Estudios Sociales Revista de Alimentación Contemporánea y Desarrollo Regional · doi:10.24836/es.v29i53.627 · Cited by 13
Is Agricultural Emissions Mitigation on the Menu for Tea Drinkers?
Boehm, R., Kitchel, H., Ahmed, S., et al. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11184883 · Cited by 13
Self-Monitoring App Preferences for Sun Protection: Discrete Choice Experiment Survey Analysis
Nittas, V., Mütsch, M., Braun, J., & Puhan, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18889 · Cited by 14
Residents’ choices and preferences regarding transit-oriented housing
Li, M., Li, R. Y. M., Taylor, M. A. P., et al. (2021) · Australian Planner · doi:10.1080/07293682.2021.1936094 · Cited by 13
Kim, T.-H., Chun, K.-S., & Yang, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132011325 · Cited by 13
Bayesian imputation of non‐chosen attribute values in revealed preference surveys
Washington, S. P., Ravulaparthy, S. K., Rose, J. M., et al. (2012) · Journal of Advanced Transportation · doi:10.1002/atr.201 · Cited by 13
Self-citationTran, D. T. T., Nomura, H., & Yabe, M. (2015) · Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.5539/jas.v7n8p81 · Cited by 13
Renewable Energy Sources in Crete: Economic Valuation Results from a Stated Choice Experiment
Emmanouilides, C. J., & Sgouromalli, T. (2013) · Procedia Technology · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.053 · Cited by 13
Revealed Parking Choices and the Value of Time
Harmatuck, D. J. (2007) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2010-04 · Cited by 13
Stated preference surveys for electric and alternative fuel vehicles: are we doing the right thing?
Massiani, J. (2014) · Transportation Letters · doi:10.1179/1942787514y.0000000022 · Cited by 13
Estimating intergenerational distribution preferences
Scarborough, H., & Bennett, J. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.002 · Cited by 15
Consumers’ Valuation for a Reduced Salt Product: A Nonhypothetical Choice Experiment
Lee, S. H., Han, D. B., Caputo, V., & Nayga, R. M. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/cjag.12081 · Cited by 13
The influence of interview location on the value of travel time savings
Hanssen, T.-E. S. (2011) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9378-1 · Cited by 13
Adaptive Hybrid Methods for Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis: A Comparative Study
Bauer, R., Menrad, K., & Decker, T. (2015) · International Journal of Marketing Studies · doi:10.5539/ijms.v7n1p1 · Cited by 13
A Voting-Based Agent System for Course Selection in E-Learning
Aseere, A. M., Gerding, E., & Millard, D. E. (2010) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.230 · Cited by 13
Practitioners preferences of care coordination for older people: A discrete choice experiment
Jasper, R., Chester, H., Hughes, J., Abendstern, M., Loynes, N., Sutcliffe, C., Davies, L. M., & Challis, D. (2017) · Journal of Gerontological Social Work · doi:10.1080/01634372.2017.1417342 · Cited by 12
Kinoshita, S. (2019) · Energy & Environment · doi:10.1177/0958305x19882386 · Cited by 13
Rith, M., Roquel, K. I. D. Z., Lopez, N. S., Fillone, A. M., & Biona, J. B. M. (2020) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100163 · Cited by 17
Real Estate and Land Property Automated Valuation Systems: A Taxonomy and Conceptual Model.Preprint
Glumac, B., & Rosiers, F. D. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3183132 · Cited by 12
Jain, M., Rao, A. B., & Patwardhan, A. (2020) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.42.2.mjai · Cited by 12
Nyarko, E. N. Y., Akoto, F. M., & Doku-Amponsah, K. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288519 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2005-06-02
- OpenAlex
- W3152367353
- Cited by
- 1,823
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 98
- FWCI
- 34.17
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- discrete choice models, multinomial logistic regression, nested logit model, mixed logit, discrete choice experiment, choice experiment design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review