Cited by 1,823Economic and Environmental ValuationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsTransportation Planning and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer

Hensher, David A., Rose, John M., Greene, William H.·2005·Cambridge University Press eBooks

DOI 10.1017/cbo9780511610356

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Almost without exception, everything human beings undertake involves a choice. In recent years there has been a growing interest in the development and application of quantitative statistical methods to study choices made by individuals with the purpose of gaining a better understanding both of how choices are made and of forecasting future choice responses. In this primer the authors provide an unintimidating introduction to the main techniques of choice analysis and include detail on themes such as data collection and preparation, model estimation and interpretation and the design of choice experiments. A companion website to the book provides practice data sets and software to estimate the main discrete choice models such as multinomial logit, nested logit and mixed logit. This primer will be an invaluable resource to students as well as of immense value to consultants and professionals, researchers and anyone else interested in choice analysis and modelling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511610356

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,001

PARAMETER EVALUATION OF A SIMPLE MEAN-FIELD MODEL OF SOCIAL INTERACTION
Gallo, I., Barra, A., & Contucci, P. (2009) · Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences · doi:10.1142/s0218202509003863 · Cited by 60
Preference for different urban greenscape designs: A choice experiment using virtual environments
Dongen, R. P. V., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2019) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126435 · Cited by 69
Testing for Complementarity: Glyphosate Tolerant Soybeans and Conservation Tillage
Perry, E. D., Moschini, G., & Hennessy, D. A. (2016) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aaw001 · Cited by 61
“In simulating the likelihood function we use 250 Halton draws, which is well above the minimum recommendation of 100 (Hensher, Rose, and Greene 2005, p. 616).11 11 Train (2000) demonstrated that the SML estimates for a mixed logit model using 100 Halton draws outperform the SML estimates using…”
Do verbal and visual nudges influence consumers’ choice for sustainable fashion?
Roozen, I. T. M., Raedts, M., & Meijburg, L. (2021) · Journal of Global Fashion Marketing · doi:10.1080/20932685.2021.1930096 · Cited by 73
Consumers’ Preferences for the Traceability Information of Seafood Safety
Hoque, M. Z., Akhter, N., & Chowdhury, M. S. R. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11121675 · Cited by 58
An exploration of factors influencing car purchasing decisions
Prieto, M., & Caemmerer, B. (2013) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/ijrdm-02-2012-0017 · Cited by 69
Stay or leave? Potential climate change adaptation strategies among Aboriginal people in coastal communities in northern Australia
Zander, K. K., Petheram, L., & Garnett, S. T. (2013) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0591-4 · Cited by 60
Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities
Böckenholt, U. (2006) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-006-1598-5 · Cited by 62
Societal Preferences for Distributive Justice in the Allocation of Health Care Resources
Skedgel, C. D., Wailoo, A., & Akehurst, R. L. (2014) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x14547915 · Cited by 60
Who Is Willing to Share Their AV? Insights about Gender Differences among Seven Countries
Polydoropoulou, A., Tsouros, I., Thomopoulos, N., Pronello, C., Elvarsson, A. B., Sigþórsson, H., Dadashzadeh, N., Stojmenova, K., Sodnik, J., Neophytou, S., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13094769 · Cited by 66
Optimal management of wetlands: Quantifying trade‐offs between flood risks, recreation, and biodiversity conservation
Birol, E., Hanley, N. D., Koundouri, P., et al. (2009) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2008wr006955 · Cited by 59
Obtaining public support for North-South climate funding: Evidence from conjoint experiments in donor countries
Gampfer, R., Bernauer, T., & Kachi, A. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.006 · Cited by 79
Modeling the Bullying Prevention Program Preferences of Educators: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Experiment
Cunningham, C. E., Vaillancourt, T., Rimas, H. L., Deal, K., Cunningham, L. J., Short, K. H., & Chen, Y. (2009) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9324-2 · Cited by 59
Estimation of the public benefits of urban water supply improvements in Ethiopia: a choice experiment
Tarfasa, S., & Brouwer, R. (2011) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2011.613793 · Cited by 59
Relative Preferences for Soil Conservation Incentives among Smallholder Farmers: Evidence from Malawi
Marenya, P., Smith, V. H., & Nkonya, E. M. (2014) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aat117 · Cited by 59
The Impact of Fear of Flying on Travelers’ Flight Choice
Fleischer, A., Tchetchik, A., & Toledo, T. (2012) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287512437856 · Cited by 58
The Influence of Culture on Climate Change Adaptation Strategies
Landauer, M., Haider, W., & Pröbstl‐Haider, U. (2013) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287513481276 · Cited by 59
An exploration of methods for obtaining 0 = dead anchors for latent scale EQ-5D-Y values
Shah, K. K., Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Kreimeier, S., & Devlin, N. J. (2020) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01205-9 · Cited by 63
Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Compensation for Changes in Urban Water Customer Service Standards
MacDonald, D. H., Morrison, M., & Barnes, M. B. (2010) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9599-7 · Cited by 60
Public preferences for vaccination programmes during pandemics caused by pathogens transmitted through respiratory droplets – a discrete choice experiment in four European countries, 2013
Determann, D., Korfage, I. J., Fagerlin, A., Steyerberg, E. W., Bliemer, M. C. J., Voeten, H. A. C. M., Richardus, J. H., Lambooij, M., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2016) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2016.21.22.30247 · Cited by 58
Preference to Local Food vs. Preference to “National” and Regional Food
Pícha, K., Navrátil, J., & Švec, R. (2017) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2016.1266549 · Cited by 58
Ride acceptance behaviour of ride-sourcing drivers
Ashkrof, P., Correia, G. H. D. A., Cats, O., & van Arem, B. (2022) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2022.103783 · Cited by 69
Do urban parking restrictions and Low Emission Zones encourage a greener mobility?
Gonzalez, J. N., Gómez, J., & Vassallo, J. M. (2022) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103319 · Cited by 58
Ecological Conservation, Ecotourism, and Sustainable Management: The Case of Penang National Park
Kaffashi, S., Radam, A., Shamsudin, M. N., et al. (2015) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f6072345 · Cited by 58
The Economic Value of Environmental Services on Indigenous-Held Lands in Australia
Zander, K. K., & Garnett, S. T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023154 · Cited by 57
Heterogeneity of farmers' preferences towards agri-environmental schemes across different agricultural subsystems
Villanueva, A. J., Rodríguez‐Entrena, M., Arriaza, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1168289 · Cited by 58
Applying fractional split model to examine the effects of roadway geometric and traffic characteristics on speeding behavior
Afghari, A. P., Haque, M. M., & Washington, S. P. (2018) · Traffic Injury Prevention · doi:10.1080/15389588.2018.1509208 · Cited by 58
Electric Car Purchase Price as a Factor Determining Consumers’ Choice and their Views on Incentives in Europe
Vilchez, J. J. G., Smyth, A. W., Kelleher, L., Lu, H., Rohr, C., Harrison, G., & Thiel, C. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11226357 · Cited by 58
Vaccine preferences and acceptance of older adults
Eilers, R., de Melker, H. E., Veldwijk, J., & Krabbe, P. F. M. (2017) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.014 · Cited by 57
Examining the characteristics and managerial challenges of professional services: An empirical study of management consultancy in the travel, tourism, and hospitality sector
Brandon‐Jones, A., Lewis, M. A., Verma, R., & Walsman, M. (2016) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2016.03.007 · Cited by 56
Is Light Rail More Attractive to users than bus Transit?: Arguments Based on Cognition and Rational Choice
Scherer, M. (2010) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2144-02 · Cited by 57
Modelling risk adaptation and mitigation behaviour under different climate change scenarios
Brouwer, R., & Schaafsma, M. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0534-1 · Cited by 60
Consumer inferences of food safety and quality
Tonsor, G. T. (2011) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbr011 · Cited by 61
Differences between the Perceptions of Captive and Choice Riders toward Bus Service Attributes and the Need for Segmentation of Bus Services in Urban India
Maitra, B., Dandapat, S., & Chintakayala, P. K. (2014) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000205 · Cited by 56
Optimizing the economic and environmental benefits of ride‐hailing and pooling
Naumov, S., & Keith, D. R. (2022) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13905 · Cited by 57
Does anybody like water restrictions? Some observations in Australian urban communities*
Cooper, B., Rose, J. M., & Crase, L. (2011) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00573.x · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Impact of Ex‐Ante Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Methods on Attribute Non‐Attendance in Choice Experiments
Bello, M., & Abdulai, A. (2016) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aav098 · Cited by 55
Gimme shelter? Heterogeneous preferences for tangible and intangible resources when choosing an incubator
van Weele, M. A., van Rijnsoever, F. J., Groen, M., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-019-09724-1 · Cited by 56
What do community health workers want? Findings of a discrete choice experiment among Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) in India
Abdel-All, M., Angell, B. J., Jan, S., Howell, M., Howard, K., Abímbọ́lá, Ṣ., & Joshi, R. (2019) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001509 · Cited by 56
Using choice experiments to improve the design of agri-environmental schemes
Latacz‐Lohmann, U., & Breustedt, G. (2019) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbz020 · Cited by 55
Chi‐squared automatic interaction detector analysis on a choice experiment: An evaluation of responsible initiatives on consumers' purchasing behavior
Boccia, F., & Sarnacchiaro, P. (2019) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1873 · Cited by 55
The Cost of Mediterranean Sea Warming and Acidification: A Choice Experiment Among Scuba Divers at Medes Islands, Spain
Rodrigues, L. C., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Loureiro, M. L., Nunes, P. A. L. D., & Rossi, S. (2015) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-015-9935-8 · Cited by 53
MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit‐risk preferences: a critical assessment
Tervonen, T., Gelhorn, H. L., Bhashyam, S. S., Poon, J. L., Gries, K. S., Rentz, A. M., & Marsh, K. (2017) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.4255 · Cited by 55
Patient Preferences for Preventive Migraine Treatments: A Discrete‐Choice Experiment
Mansfield, C. A., Gebben, D., Sutphin, J., Tepper, S. J., Schwedt, T. J., Sapra, S. J., & Shah, N. A. (2019) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.13498 · Cited by 54
Motives for walking and cycling when commuting – differences in local contexts and attitudes
Ek, K., Wårell, L., & Andersson, L. (2021) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-021-00502-5 · Cited by 66
Consumers’ Preferences and Attitudes towards Plant-Based Milk
Su, W., Zhang, Y. Y., Li, S., & Sheng, J. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13010002 · Cited by 57
How Local Is Local? A Reflection on Canadian Local Food Labeling Policy from Consumer Preference
Lim, K. H., & Hu, W. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/cjag.12062 · Cited by 57
Improving the application of long‐term ecology in conservation and land management
Davies, A. L., Colombo, S., & Hanley, N. (2014) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12163 · Cited by 49
Nonmarket valuation in developing countries: incorporating labour contributions in environmental benefits estimates
Rai, R. K., & Scarborough, H. (2014) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12071 · Cited by 54
Investigating the influence of curbs on single-vehicle crash injury severity utilizing zero-inflated ordered probit models
Jiang, X., Huang, B., Zaretzki, R., Richards, S. H., Yan, X., & Zhang, H. (2013) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.018 · Cited by 59
Qualitative Data Analysis
Ghauri, P. N., Grønhaug, K., & Strange, R. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762427.012 · Cited by 56
Conflicts and Cooperation in Brownfield Redevelopment Projects: Application of Conjoint Analysis and Game Theory to Model Strategic Decision Making
Blokhuis, E., Snijders, C. C. P., Han, Q., et al. (2012) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000122 · Cited by 53
Bridges or Traps? Casualisation and Labour Market Transitions in Australia
Watson, I. (2013) · Journal of Industrial Relations · doi:10.1177/0022185612465535 · Cited by 53
Short-term choice behaviour in a mixed fishery: investigating métier selection in the Danish gillnet fishery
Andersen, B. S., Ulrich, C., Eigaard, O. R., & Christensen, A. (2011) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsr181 · Cited by 55
VALUATION OF CLIMATE-CHANGE EFFECTS ON MEDITERRANEAN SHRUBLANDS
Riera, P., Peñuelas, J., Farreras, V., et al. (2007) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0091:voceom]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 53
Assessing consumer preferences and willingness to pay for organic tomatoes in Albania: a conjoint choice experiment study
Skreli, E., Imami, D., Chan, C., Canavari, M., Zhllima, E., & Pire, E. (2017) · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.5424/sjar/2017153-9889 · Cited by 53
Disaggregate Demand Analyses for Conventional and Alternative Fueled Automobiles: A Review
Potoglou, D., & Kanaroglou, P. (2008) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568310701230398 · Cited by 52
Eliciting preferences for waterpipe tobacco smoking using a discrete choice experiment: implications for product regulation
Salloum, R. G., Maziak, W., Hammond, D. G., Nakkash, R. T., Islam, F., Cheng, X., & Thrasher, J. F. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009497 · Cited by 53
Simplifying the complex: an ‘Ecosystem Principles Approach’ to goods and services management in marine coastal ecosystems
Townsend, M., Thrush, S. F., & Carbines, M. (2011) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09118 · Cited by 50
Gender Inequality in Safety and Security Perceptions in Railway Stations
Coppola, P., & Silvestri, F. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13074007 · Cited by 54
Insider Control and the FDI Location Decision
Strange, R. N., Filatotchev, I. V., Lien, Y.-C., & Piesse, J. (2009) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-009-0003-x · Cited by 51
Designing choice experiments with many attributes. An application to setting priorities for orthopaedic waiting lists
Witt, J. C., Scott, A., & Osborne, R. H. (2008) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1396 · Cited by 51
Incentives for non-physician health professionals to work in the rural and remote areas of Mozambique—a discrete choice experiment for eliciting job preferences
Honda, A., & Vio, F. (2015) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0015-5 · Cited by 50
Does habitual behavior affect the choice of alternative fuel vehicles?
Valeri, E., & Cherchi, E. (2016) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568318.2016.1163445 · Cited by 51
Diabolical dilemmas of COVID-19: An empirical study into Dutch society’s trade-offs between health impacts and other effects of the lockdown
Chorus, C. G., Sandorf, E. D., & Mouter, N. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238683 · Cited by 53
A Latent Analysis of Images and Words in Wine Choice
Jarvis, W., Loose, S. M., & Chiong, K. (2010) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.05.001 · Cited by 51
Intertemporal Valuation of River Restoration
Meyer, A. G. (2012) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-012-9580-4 · Cited by 50
Effect of pill burden on dosing preferences, willingness to pay, and likely adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes
Hauber, B., Yang, Tunceli, González, J. M., Brodovicz, K. G., Zhang, Q., Han, Gantz, Alexander, C. M., Davies, et al. (2013) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s43465 · Cited by 53
Defining Sustainable Food Market Segments: Do Motivations and Values Vary by Shopping Locale?
Onozaka, Y., Nurse, G., & McFadden, D. T. (2010) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aaq152 · Cited by 50
Strategic Management of Cloud Computing Services: Focusing on Consumer Adoption Behavior
Shin, J., Jo, M., Lee, J., et al. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2013.2295829 · Cited by 50
Estimating Landholders’ Probability of Participating in a Stewardship Program, and the Implications for Spatial Conservation Priorities
Adams, V. M., Pressey, R. L., & Stoeckl, N. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097941 · Cited by 50
Modeling demand for catastrophic flood risk insurance in coastal zones in Vietnam using choice experiments
Brouwer, R., Tinh, B. D., Tuấn, T. H., Magnussen, K., & Navrud, S. (2013) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x13000405 · Cited by 54
Housing preferences among students: collective housing versus individual accommodations? A stated preference study in Antwerp (Belgium)
Verhetsel, A., Kessels, R., Zijlstra, T., & Bavel, M. V. (2016) · Journal of Housing and the Built Environment · doi:10.1007/s10901-016-9522-5 · Cited by 49
The role of parental risk judgements, transport safety attitudes, transport priorities and accident experiences on pupils’ walking to school
Mehdizadeh, M., Nordfjærn, T., Mamdoohi, A. R., & Mohaymany, A. S. (2017) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.020 · Cited by 50
Forest cover, socioeconomics, and reported flood frequency in developing countries
Ferreira, S., & Ghimire, R. (2012) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2011wr011701 · Cited by 50
Providing Information to Parents of Children with Mental Health Problems: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Analysis of Professional Preferences
Cunningham, C. E., Deal, K., Rimas, H. L., Chen, Y., Buchanan, D. H., & Sdao-Jarvie, K. (2009) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9338-9 · Cited by 51
The Basket-Based Choice Experiment: A Method for Food Demand Policy Analysis
Caputo, V., & Lusk, J. L. (2022) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102252 · Cited by 49
Modeling the anti‐cyberbullying preferences of university students: Adaptive choice‐based conjoint analysis
Cunningham, C. E., Chen, Y., Vaillancourt, T., Rimas, H. L., Deal, K., Cunningham, L. J., & Ratcliffe, J. (2014) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21560 · Cited by 50
Parents’ preferences for seasonal influenza vaccine for their children in Japan
Shono, A., & Kondo, M. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.002 · Cited by 51
Personal Values and Decision Making: Evidence from Environmental Footprint Labeling in Canada
Grebitus, C., Steiner, B., & Veeman, M. M. (2012) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aas109 · Cited by 49
Choice Consistency and Preference Stability in Test-Retests of Discrete Choice Experiment and Open-Ended Willingness to Pay Elicitation Formats
Brouwer, R., Logar, I., & Sheremet, O. (2016) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0045-z · Cited by 50
Using a choice experiment and birder preferences to guide bird‐conservation funding
Steven, R., Smart, J. C. R., Morrison, C., & Castley, J. G. (2016) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12849 · Cited by 49
Assessing changing consumer preferences for livestock production processes
Olynk, N. J. (2012) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.2527/af.2012-0046 · Cited by 49
Valuing Traits of Indigenous Cows in Central Ethiopia
Kassie, G. T., Abdulai, A., & Wollny, C. B. A. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00191.x · Cited by 49
Eliciting the demand for long‐term care coverage: a discrete choice modelling analysis
Brau, R., & Bruni, M. L. (2007) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1271 · Cited by 49
Breeding practices and trait preferences of smallholder farmers for indigenous sheep in the northwest highlands of Ethiopia: Inputs to design a breeding program
Abebe, A. S., Alemayehu, K., Johansson, A. M., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233040 · Cited by 48
The Technology Acceptance Model and Hospitality and Tourism Consumers’ Intention to Use Mobile Technologies: Meta-Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling
Li, F. S., Zhu, D., Lin, M.-T., & Kim, P. B. (2024) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/19389655241226558 · Cited by 48
The Impact of Cigarette Packaging Design Among Young Females in Canada: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment
Kornas, K., Fong, G. T., Gallopel‐Morvan, K., Islam, T., & Hammond, D. G. (2015) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv114 · Cited by 48
Country-of-origin preferences for organic food
Schjøll, A. (2016) · Organic Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s13165-016-0159-1 · Cited by 48
Re-examining empirical evidence on stated preferences: importance of incentive compatibility
Zawojska, E., & Czajkowski, M. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1080/21606544.2017.1322537 · Cited by 57
HIV testing preferences among long distance truck drivers in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment
Strauss, M., George, G., Lansdell, E., Mantell, J. E., Govender, K., Romo, M. L., Odhiambo, J. O., Mwai, E., Nyaga, E. N., & Kelvin, E. A. (2017) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2017.1367086 · Cited by 48
Patient Preferences for Attributes of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Medications in Germany and Spain: An Online Discrete-Choice Experiment Survey
Mansfield, C. A., Sikirica, M. V., Pugh, A., Poulos, C. M., Unmuessig, V., Moraño, R. B., & Martin, A. A. (2017) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0326-8 · Cited by 48
Analysis of the Factors that Influence Olive Oil Demand in the Veneto Region (Italy)
Tempesta, T., & Vecchiato, D. (2019) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture9070154 · Cited by 48
Are Adult Patients More Tolerant of Treatment Risks Than Parents of Juvenile Patients?
Johnson, F. R., Özdemir, S., Mansfield, C. A., Hass, S., Siegel, C. A., & Sands, B. E. (2008) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01135.x · Cited by 48
A dual response choice experiments (DRCE) design to assess rabbit meat preference in Catalonia
Kallas, Z., & Roig, J. M. G. (2012) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070701211262984 · Cited by 47
Are Chemotherapy Patients’ HRQoL Importance Weights Consistent with Linear Scoring Rules? A Stated-choice Approach
Johnson, F. R., Hauber, B., Osoba, D., Hsu, M., Coombs, J. H., & Copley‐Merriman, C. (2006) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-005-0581-4 · Cited by 50
What determines patient preferences for treating low risk basal cell carcinoma when comparing surgery vs imiquimod? A discrete choice experiment survey from the SINS trial
Tinelli, M., Ozolins, M., Bath-Hextall, F. J., & Williams, H. C. (2012) · BMC Dermatology · doi:10.1186/1471-5945-12-19 · Cited by 47
Identifying Societal Preferences for River Restoration in a Densely Populated Urban Environment: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Central Brussels
Chen, W. Y., Liekens, I., & Broekx, S. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0885-5 · Cited by 48
Market Feasibility of Faecal Sludge and Municipal Solid Waste-Based Compost as Measured by Farmers’ Willingness-to-Pay for Product Attributes: Evidence from Kampala, Uganda
Danso, G., Otoo, M., Ekere, W., et al. (2017) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources6030031 · Cited by 47
Interdependency among addictive behaviours and time/risk preferences: Discrete choice model analysis of smoking, drinking, and gambling
Ida, T., & Goto, R. (2009) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.003 · Cited by 50

Authors: Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H.
Affiliations: The University of Sydney (AU)
New York University (US)
ORCID: Hensher, David A.
Rose, John M.
Greene, William H.
Venue: Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Published: 2005-06-02
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511610356
OpenAlex: W3152367353
Cited by: 1,823
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 62 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 98
FWCI: 34.17
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 2652 d)
Locations: Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords: discrete choice models, multinomial logistic regression, nested logit model, mixed logit, discrete choice experiment, choice experiment design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks