The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
Abstract
Based on a detailed study of 35 cases in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and post-communist Eurasia, this book explores the fate of competitive authoritarian regimes between 1990 and 2008. It finds that where social, economic, and technocratic ties to the West were extensive, as in Eastern Europe and the Americas, the external cost of abuse led incumbents to cede power rather than crack down, which led to democratization. Where ties to the West were limited, external democratizing pressure was weaker and countries rarely democratized. In these cases, regime outcomes hinged on the character of state and ruling party organizations. Where incumbents possessed developed and cohesive coercive party structures, they could thwart opposition challenges, and competitive authoritarian regimes survived; where incumbents lacked such organizational tools, regimes were unstable but rarely democratized.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Levitsky and Way (2010, 91) go so far as to categorize the country as competitive authoritarian, though in the data we use, Slovakia does not experience a breakdown.”
From Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection (2020) · cites this paper as Levitsky and Way 2010
In the citing paper
“Conversely, authoritarian regimes often manipulate legal structures to consolidate power while preserving a democratic façade, a phenomenon described by Levitsky and Way (2010) as 'competitive authoritarianism.'”
From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Levitsky and Way (2010)
In the citing paper
“These findings support the arguments of Levitsky and Way (2010), who contend that when judicial independence is compromised, democracy deteriorates, and authoritarian rule expands.”
From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Levitsky and Way (2010)
In the citing paper
“The cumulative weight of this literature is that competitive elections are necessary but not sufficient for democratic consolidation, and that the conditions under which they are sufficient remain incompletely theorized.”
From THE LIMITS OF ELECTORAL COMPETITION: HOW POLITICAL OPENINGS CAN FUEL PATRONAGE AND INSTABILITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SIERRA LEONE, GHANA, AND KENYA (2026) · cites this paper as Levitsky and Way (2010)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,002
The evolution of rule of law in Cambodia
McCarthy, S., & Un, K. (2015) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1103736 · Cited by 43
Authoritarian Institutions and State Repression
Rivera, M. (2016) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002716632301 · Cited by 49
Thomson, H. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108568951 · Cited by 61
Moss, D., Michaelsen, M. G., & Kennedy, G. (2022) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12372 · Cited by 40
Elections in Hybrid Regimes: Conceptual Stretching Revived
Morgenbesser, L. (2013) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12020 · Cited by 49
The Impact of External Factors on Regime Transition: Lessons from the Russian Regions
Obydenkova, A., & Libman, A. (2012) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.2747/1060-586x.28.3.346 · Cited by 43
Explaining Orbán: A Political Transaction Cost Theory of Authoritarian Populism
Ádám, Z. (2019) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2019.1643249 · Cited by 43
The latent characteristics that structure autocratic rule
Wright, J. (2019) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2019.50 · Cited by 44
Signals of Support From Great Power Patrons and the Use of Repression During Nonviolent Protests
Tolstrup, J., Seeberg, M. A., & Glavind, J. G. (2018) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414018784047 · Cited by 42
Teorell, J., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592718002098 · Cited by 43
How State Capacity Helps Autocrats win Elections
Seeberg, M. B. (2021) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123419000450 · Cited by 43
Chinese linkage, leverage, and Cambodia’s transition to hegemonic authoritarianism
Loughlin, N. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1888931 · Cited by 42
Political Leadership in Africa
Carbone, G., & Pellegata, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108529266 · Cited by 46
Authoritarian Durability: Public Opinion towards Democracy in Southeast Asia
Pietsch, J. (2014) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2014.933836 · Cited by 42
Introduction: Rethinking Party System Institutionalization in Asia
Hicken, A. D., & Kuhonta, E. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107300385.001 · Cited by 41
Party System Institutionalization, Party Collapse and Party Building
Mainwaring, S. P. (2016) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2016.21 · Cited by 43
Mare, A. (2018) · African Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/23743670.2018.1425150 · Cited by 42
Subnational competitive authoritarianism and power-sharing in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Kapidžić, D. (2019) · Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies · doi:10.1080/14683857.2020.1700880 · Cited by 43
Dollbaum, J. M. (2020) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.1080/1060586x.2020.1750275 · Cited by 46
Alyukov, M. (2022) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2021.2016633 · Cited by 54
Linde, J., & Karlsson, M. (2013) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.757619 · Cited by 42
Owen, C. (2015) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2015.1023894 · Cited by 41
Contingent Instrumental and Intrinsic Support: Exploring Regime Support in Asia
Huhe, N., & Tang, M. (2016) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321715622791 · Cited by 42
Grimm, S., & Weiffen, B. (2018) · Conflict Security and Development · doi:10.1080/14678802.2018.1483556 · Cited by 45
Kuehn, D., & Croissant, A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803362.001.0001 · Cited by 40
Introduction: Understanding Thailand’s Politics
Kanchoochat, V., & Hewison, K. (2016) · Journal of Contemporary Asia · doi:10.1080/00472336.2016.1173305 · Cited by 45
Societal Empowerment and Europeanization: Revisiting the EU's Impact on Democratization
Noutcheva, G. (2015) · JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.12322 · Cited by 41
Knott, E. (2018) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2018.1493993 · Cited by 42
Isaacs, R., & Whitmore, S. (2013) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.768616 · Cited by 40
Minority representation in a semi-democratic regime: the Georgian case
Zollinger, D., & Bochsler, D. (2011) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2011.605996 · Cited by 40
Frustrated Leadership: Russia's Economic Alternative to the West
Johnson, J. E., & Köstem, S. (2016) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12301 · Cited by 40
Electoral theocracy and hybrid sovereignty in Iran
Ghobadzadeh, N., & Rahim, L. Z. (2016) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2016.1175097 · Cited by 39
From Medicine to Mobilization: Social Service Provision and the Islamist Reputational Advantage
Brooke, S. (2017) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592716004126 · Cited by 40
Anatomy of a rigged election in a hybrid regime: the lessons from Bangladesh
Riaz, A., & Parvez, S. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1867110 · Cited by 40
O’Dwyer, C., & Stenberg, M. (2021) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2021.12 · Cited by 40
“Analysts describe a common playbook used by dominant parties: undermining the fairness of elections; discretionary use of legal instruments to undermine civil liberties; and restricting the opposition’s access to public resources, the media and the judicial system (Levitsky and Way 2010: 7–12).”
BackgroundJamil, S. (2021) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2021.1981148 · Cited by 41
Bruszt, L., & McDermott, G. A. (2011) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.619469 · Cited by 40
The international dimension of authoritarian regime legitimation: insights from the Cuban case
Hoffmann, B. (2014) · Journal of International Relations and Development · doi:10.1057/jird.2014.9 · Cited by 42
Ocantos, E. A. G., de Jonge, C. K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2015) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414015574882 · Cited by 41
Managing elite defection in Museveni’s Uganda: the 2016 elections in perspective
Khisa, M. (2016) · Journal of Eastern African Studies · doi:10.1080/17531055.2016.1272288 · Cited by 40
Lee, F. L. F., Chan, M., Chen, H., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2019) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2019.1586567 · Cited by 45
Shoring Up Autocracy: Participatory Technologies and Regime Support in Putin’s Russia
Chapman, H. S. (2021) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414021989759 · Cited by 40
“Like other nominally-democratic practices, participatory technologies in non-democracies combine “democratic rules with authoritarian governance” (Levitsky & Way, 2002, 2010) to balance citizen participation with elite manipulation.1 Participatory technologies are a central tool of “consultative…”
BackgroundPolicing following political and social transitions: Russia, Brazil, and China compared
Light, M. A., Prado, M. M., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480614568742 · Cited by 39
Hecht, C. (2016) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s0260210516000073 · Cited by 38
Parties, Movements, and the Making of Democracy
Bermeo, N., & Yashar, D. J. (2016) · Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World · doi:10.1017/9781316661581.001 · Cited by 39
Gainous, J., Abbott, J. P., & Wagner, K. M. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9456-6 · Cited by 39
Dufy, C., & Thiriot, C. (2014) · Revue internationale de politique comparée · doi:10.3917/ripc.203.0019 · Cited by 39
The Media Freedom Movement in Malaysia and the Electoral Authoritarian Regime
Tapsell, R. (2013) · Journal of Contemporary Asia · doi:10.1080/00472336.2013.765138 · Cited by 39
Organizing Civil Society in Russia and China: A Comparative Approach
Richter, J., & HATCH, W. F. (2013) · International Journal of Politics Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/s10767-013-9148-5 · Cited by 39
Grossman, G., Michelitch, K., & Santamaría, M. (2017) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414016666862 · Cited by 36
Generating Regime Support in Contemporary China
Dickson, B. J., Shen, M., & Yan, J. (2016) · Modern China · doi:10.1177/0097700416672419 · Cited by 37
Democracy aid or autocracy aid? Unintended effects of democracy assistance in Morocco
Khakee, A. (2017) · The Journal of North African Studies · doi:10.1080/13629387.2017.1279971 · Cited by 41
Mijares, V. M. (2017) · Latin American Policy · doi:10.1111/lamp.12128 · Cited by 45
Electoral Systems, Regional Resentment and the Surprising Success of Anglo-American Populism
Spicer, J. S. (2018) · Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx029 · Cited by 42
Conceptualizing and Measuring the Quality of Democracy: The Citizens’ Perspective
Fuchs, D., & Roller, E. (2018) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v6i1.1188 · Cited by 39
Opalo, K. O. (2017) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123418000492 · Cited by 39
“Indeed, from the early 1990s the scholarship on democratization widely discusses the adverse impact of the end of the Cold War on autocracies around the world (Levitsky and Way 2010).”
BackgroundIntroduction The Politics of Participation in Latin America: New Actors and Institutions
Rich, J. A. J., Mayka, L., & Montero, A. P. (2019) · Latin American Politics and Society · doi:10.1017/lap.2018.74 · Cited by 38
Expressive Voting in Autocracies: A Theory of Non-Economic Participation with Evidence from Cameroon
Letsa, N. W. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592719001002 · Cited by 36
Ruling but not Governing: Tutelary Regimes and the Case of Myanmar
Bünte, M. (2021) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2020.38 · Cited by 38
Authoritarian power and contestation beyond the state
Gurol, J., Jenss, A., Rodríguez, F., Schuetze, B., & Wetterich, C. (2023) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2022.2162290 · Cited by 40
Repression and Dissent in Moments of Uncertainty: Panel Data Evidence from Zimbabwe
LeBas, A., & Young, L. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423000230 · Cited by 38
Roller, E. (2013) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2013.773201 · Cited by 39
Linkages and the promotion of democracy: the EU's eastern neighbourhood
Sasse, G. (2012) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2012.659014 · Cited by 38
Stasis or Decay? Reconciling Covert War and the Democratic Peace
Poznansky, M. (2015) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12193 · Cited by 38
Comparing Legitimation Strategies in Post-Soviet Countries
von Soest, C., & Grauvogel, J. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137489449_2 · Cited by 38
Great powers, civil society and authoritarian diffusion in Central Asia
Ziegler, C. E. (2016) · Central Asian Survey · doi:10.1080/02634937.2016.1228608 · Cited by 46
Historical Polarization and Representation in South American Party Systems, 1900–1990
Bornschier, S. (2016) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123416000387 · Cited by 46
Legitimation, cooptation, and repression and the survival of electoral autocracies
Schneider, C. Q., & Maerz, S. F. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s12286-017-0332-2 · Cited by 38
Gilbert, L., & Mohseni, P. (2018) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1471645 · Cited by 40
Bonikowski, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108692793.006 · Cited by 43
Fighting for a name on the ballot: constituency-level analysis of nomination violence in Zambia
Goldring, E., & Wahman, M. (2018) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2017.1394844 · Cited by 37
Rethinking Democratic Diffusion: Bringing Regime Type Back In
Goldring, E., & Greitens, S. C. (2019) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414019852701 · Cited by 37
“…for example, regime type does not perfectly capture specific attributes that might condition vulnerability to protest, such as the makeup of the coercive apparatus (Greitens, 2016) or the degree of competitive authoritarianism (Brownlee, 2009; Donno, 2013; Levitsky & Way, 2010; Miller, 2017).”
BackgroundDemocratic backsliding in sub-Saharan Africa and the role of China’s development assistance
Hess, S., & Aidoo, R. (2019) · Commonwealth and Comparative Politics · doi:10.1080/14662043.2019.1646008 · Cited by 36
Authoritarianism and academic freedom in neoliberal Turkey
Doğan, S., & Selenica, E. (2021) · Globalisation Societies and Education · doi:10.1080/14767724.2021.1899801 · Cited by 37
“The term refers to a system whereby the opposition and the ruling party compete, always with the constant fear of losing (Levitsky and Way 2002, 2010).”
BackgroundCensorship and the Impact of Repression on Dissent
Pop-Elecheș, G., & Way, L. A. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12633 · Cited by 36
“…In 2008, Moldova had a combined Freedom House score of 8 – which was the median score for all of the competitive authoritarian regimes examined by Levitsky and Way (2010) in that year. opposition rallies.11 Opposition also found it increasingly hard to attract donations from businesses and…”
BackgroundSelf-citationTrojan horses in liberal international organizations? How democratic backsliders undermine the UNHRC
Meyerrose, A. M., & Nooruddin, I. (2023) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-023-09511-6 · Cited by 37
Toepfl, F. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12018 · Cited by 38
A Psychological Firewall? Risk Perceptions and Public Support for Online Censorship in Russia*
Nisbet, E. C., Kamenchuk, O., & Dal, A. (2017) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12435 · Cited by 40
Two for One: Public Welfare and Regime Legitimacy Through State Funding for CSOs in Russia
Fröhlich, C., & Skokova, Y. A. (2020) · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-020-00203-y · Cited by 37
Engelcke, D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634342 · Cited by 45
Shifts in Support for Authoritarianism and Democracy in the Western Balkans
Lavrič, M., & Bieber, F. (2020) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2020.1757468 · Cited by 45
Perú 2019: crisis política y salida institucional
Paredes, M., & Encinas, D. (2020) · Revista de ciencia política · doi:10.4067/s0718-090x2020005000116 · Cited by 37
The Effects of China's Development Projects on Political Accountability
Ping, S.-N., Wang, Y.-T., & Chang, W.-Y. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123420000381 · Cited by 37
The Middle Class in Mozambique
Sumich, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108659659 · Cited by 37
Roberts, S. P. (2012) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2012.684754 · Cited by 36
Tools of single party hegemony in Tanzania: evidence from surveys and survey experiments
Croke, K. G. (2016) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1146696 · Cited by 36
Nigeria and Democratic Progress by Elections in Africa
Carbone, G., & Cassani, A. (2016) · Africa Spectrum · doi:10.1177/000203971605100302 · Cited by 35
Strategic Uncertainty and Elite Defections in Electoral Autocracies: A Cross-National Analysis
del Río, A. (2022) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140221074273 · Cited by 37
Swenson, G. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197530429.001.0001 · Cited by 36
Stulberg, A. N. (2012) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.603662 · Cited by 40
Political repression in a sub-national hybrid regime: the PRC’s governing strategies in Hong Kong
Kwong, Y. (2018) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2017.1423530 · Cited by 36
The political economy of health financing reform in Malaysia
Croke, K. G., Yusoff, M. B. M., Abdullah, Z., Hanafiah, A. N. M., Mokhtaruddin, K., Ramli, E. S., Borhan, N. F., Almodovar-Diaz, Y., Atun, R. A., & Virk, A. (2019) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czz089 · Cited by 44
Farmanfarmaian, R. (2014) · The Journal of North African Studies · doi:10.1080/13629387.2014.975663 · Cited by 35
Møller, J. Ø., Skaaning, S., & Tolstrup, J. (2016) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2015.37 · Cited by 35
Authoritarian Cooptation of Civil Society: The Case of Belarus
Сергеевна, А. А., Navumau, V., Nizhnikaŭ, R., & Polishchuk, L. (2022) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2021.2009773 · Cited by 35
Ip, E. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108163804 · Cited by 49
Electoral authoritarianism and democracy: A formal model of regime transitions
Miller, M. K. (2012) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951629812460122 · Cited by 35
Elections as Causes of Democratization: Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective
Morgenbesser, L., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2018) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414018758763 · Cited by 43
“Under hegemonic authoritarianism, those same actors legally bar opposition parties from existing, violate basic civil liberties through the use of overt repression, and monopolize access to resources, media, and the law (on both subtypes, see Levitsky & Way, 2010).”
BackgroundFrom Revolution to ‘Counter-Revolution’: Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe 30 Years On
Zielonka, J., & Rupnik, J. D. (2020) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2020.1784394 · Cited by 35
San, S., Bastug, M. F., & Basli, H. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1867880 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Way, Lucan A.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2010-08-16
- OpenAlex
- W4300022765
- Cited by
- 3,459
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 444 · 2025: 375 · 2024: 177 · 2023: 183 · 2022: 220 · 2021: 263 · 2020: 305 · 2019: 343 · 2018: 276 · 2017: 187 · 2016: 192 · 2015: 148 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 68
- FWCI
- 86.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- competitive authoritarianism, democratization, regime survival, state organization, incumbent firms, Eastern Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
