The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
Abstract
Based on a detailed study of 35 cases in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and post-communist Eurasia, this book explores the fate of competitive authoritarian regimes between 1990 and 2008. It finds that where social, economic, and technocratic ties to the West were extensive, as in Eastern Europe and the Americas, the external cost of abuse led incumbents to cede power rather than crack down, which led to democratization. Where ties to the West were limited, external democratizing pressure was weaker and countries rarely democratized. In these cases, regime outcomes hinged on the character of state and ruling party organizations. Where incumbents possessed developed and cohesive coercive party structures, they could thwart opposition challenges, and competitive authoritarian regimes survived; where incumbents lacked such organizational tools, regimes were unstable but rarely democratized.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Levitsky and Way (2010, 91) go so far as to categorize the country as competitive authoritarian, though in the data we use, Slovakia does not experience a breakdown.”
From Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection (2020) · cites this paper as Levitsky and Way 2010
In the citing paper
“Conversely, authoritarian regimes often manipulate legal structures to consolidate power while preserving a democratic façade, a phenomenon described by Levitsky and Way (2010) as 'competitive authoritarianism.'”
From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Levitsky and Way (2010)
In the citing paper
“These findings support the arguments of Levitsky and Way (2010), who contend that when judicial independence is compromised, democracy deteriorates, and authoritarian rule expands.”
From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Levitsky and Way (2010)
In the citing paper
“The cumulative weight of this literature is that competitive elections are necessary but not sufficient for democratic consolidation, and that the conditions under which they are sufficient remain incompletely theorized.”
From THE LIMITS OF ELECTORAL COMPETITION: HOW POLITICAL OPENINGS CAN FUEL PATRONAGE AND INSTABILITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SIERRA LEONE, GHANA, AND KENYA (2026) · cites this paper as Levitsky and Way (2010)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,002
Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science
Thelen, K., & Mahoney, J. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316273104.002 · Cited by 149
The problem with autocracy promotion
Tansey, O. (2015) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1095736 · Cited by 153
Selçuk, O., & Hekimci, D. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1803841 · Cited by 151
Middeldorp, N., & Billon, P. L. (2019) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2018.1530586 · Cited by 154
Strong presidents and weak institutions: populism in Turkey, Venezuela and Ecuador
Selçuk, O. (2016) · Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies · doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1242893 · Cited by 142
Access to Power Versus Exercise of Power Reconceptualizing the Quality of Democracy in Latin America
Mazzuca, S. L. (2010) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-010-9069-5 · Cited by 136
The Ideological Shadow of Authoritarianism
Dinas, E., & Northmore-Ball, K. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414019852699 · Cited by 138
Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding
GRUMBACH, J. M. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000934 · Cited by 135
Foreign Aid, Human Rights, and Democracy Promotion: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Carnegie, A. S., & Marinov, N. (2017) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12289 · Cited by 132
Sakwa, R. (2010) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.2747/1060-586x.26.3.185 · Cited by 134
Democracy against Parties? Party System Deinstitutionalization in Colombia
Dargent, E., & Muñoz, P. (2011) · Journal of Politics in Latin America · doi:10.1177/1866802x1100300202 · Cited by 130
Democratization During the Third Wave
Haggard, S. M., & Kaufman, R. R. (2016) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-042114-015137 · Cited by 140
Making It Personal: Regime Type and Nuclear Proliferation
Way, C. R., & WEEKS, J. L. P. (2013) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12080 · Cited by 133
Chinese Economic Statecraft and U.S. Hegemony in Latin America: An Empirical Analysis, 2003–2014
Urdínez, F., Mourón, F., Schenoni, L. L., & de Oliveira, A. J. (2016) · Latin American Politics and Society · doi:10.1111/laps.12000 · Cited by 132
Recapturing Regime Type in International Relations: Leaders, Institutions, and Agency Space
Hyde, S., & Saunders, E. N. (2020) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818319000365 · Cited by 134
Is There a Crisis of Democracy in Europe?
Kriesi, H. (2020) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-020-00231-9 · Cited by 131
Populism and competitive authoritarianism in Turkey
Castaldo, A. (2018) · Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies · doi:10.1080/14683857.2018.1550948 · Cited by 130
Reversing regimes and concepts: from democratization to autocratization
Cassani, A., & Tomini, L. (2018) · European Political Science · doi:10.1057/s41304-018-0168-5 · Cited by 148
The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy
BAGG, S. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000527 · Cited by 128
The Origins of Dominant Parties
Reuter, O. J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316761649 · Cited by 129
From Formlessness to Structure? The Institutionalization of Competitive Party Systems in Africa
Weghorst, K. R., & Bernhard, M. H. (2014) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414013516068 · Cited by 129
Pandemic democracy: elections and COVID-19
Landman, T., & Splendore, L. D. G. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1765003 · Cited by 126
Gravity centres of authoritarian rule: a conceptual approach
Kneuer, M., & Demmelhuber, T. (2015) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1018898 · Cited by 124
Party Systems and Decentralization in Africa
Riedl, R. B., & Dickovick, J. T. (2013) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-013-9144-9 · Cited by 125
Yabancı, B. (2016) · Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies · doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1242204 · Cited by 128
From Shocks to Waves: Hegemonic Transitions and Democratization in the Twentieth Century
Gunitsky, S. (2014) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818314000113 · Cited by 137
Authoritarian Institutions and Women’s Rights
Donno, D., & Kreft, A.-K. (2019) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414018797954 · Cited by 121
The Political Nature of Ideological Polarization: The Case of Hungary
Vegetti, F. (2018) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716218813895 · Cited by 136
Tolstrup, J. (2014) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12079 · Cited by 131
Howard, L. M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108557689 · Cited by 124
The limits of autocracy promotion: The case of Russia in the ‘near abroad’
Way, L. A. (2015) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12092 · Cited by 119
Self-citationDealing with populists in government: some comparative conclusions
Taggart, P. A., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2015) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1076230 · Cited by 118
Déjà vu? Polarization and Endangered Democracies in the 21st Century
Somer, M., & McCoy, J. (2018) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764218760371 · Cited by 146
Béland, D., Campbell, A. L., & Weaver, R. K. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108938914 · Cited by 135
Surviving Elections: Election Violence, Incumbent Victory and Post-Election Repercussions
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Hyde, S., & Jablonski, R. (2016) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712341600020x · Cited by 123
The vicious circle of post-Soviet neopatrimonialism in Russia
Гельман, В. (2015) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.1080/1060586x.2015.1071014 · Cited by 115
How and Why Armed Groups Participate in Elections
Matanock, A. M., & Staniland, P. (2018) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592718001019 · Cited by 126
Foreign Direct Investment, Regime Type, and Labor Protest in Developing Countries
Robertson, G. B., & Teitelbaum, E. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00510.x · Cited by 112
Authoritarianism Online: What Can We Learn from Internet Data in Nondemocracies?
Greitens, S. C. (2013) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096513000346 · Cited by 111
Political parties and rallies in Latin America
Szwarcberg, M. (2012) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068811436049 · Cited by 114
International Law in National Legal Systems: An Empirical Investigation
Verdier, P.-H., & Versteeg, M. (2015) · American Journal of International Law · doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0514 · Cited by 116
Non‐state authoritarianism and diaspora politics
ADAMSON, F. B. (2020) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12246 · Cited by 116
Why did Turkish democracy collapse? A political economy account of AKP’s authoritarianism
Esen, B., & Gümüşçü, Ş. (2020) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068820923722 · Cited by 114
Mainwaring, S. P. (2012) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592712002629 · Cited by 113
Measuring Electoral Integrity around the World: A New Dataset
Norris, P., Frank, R. W., & Coma, F. M. I. (2014) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096514001061 · Cited by 126
Kazakhstan's Authoritarian "Persuasion"
Schatz, E. A. D., & Maltseva, E. (2012) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.2747/1060-586x.28.1.45 · Cited by 113
Hassan, M. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912916653476 · Cited by 109
Pulling the Strings? The Strategic Use of Pro-Government Mobilization in Authoritarian Regimes
Hellmeier, S., & Weidmann, N. B. (2019) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414019843559 · Cited by 84
A comparative study of legitimation strategies in hybrid regimes
Mazepus, H., Veenendaal, W. P., McCarthy‐Jones, A., & Vásquez, J. M. T. (2016) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2016.1157855 · Cited by 117
Weapons of the Powerful: Authoritarian Elite Competition and Politicized Anticorruption in China
Zhu, J., & Zhang, D. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414016672234 · Cited by 112
The Fingerprints of Fraud: Evidence from Mexico’s 1988 Presidential Election
Cantú, F. (2019) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055419000285 · Cited by 105
Authoritarian-Led Democratization
Riedl, R. B., Slater, D., Wong, J., & Ziblatt, D. F. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-052318-025732 · Cited by 113
Koinova, M. (2017) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2017.1354152 · Cited by 119
Erosion or decay? Conceptualizing causes and mechanisms of democratic regression
Gerschewski, J. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935 · Cited by 123
Authoritarian consolidation dynamics in Turkey
Akçay, Ü. (2020) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2020.1845920 · Cited by 107
Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection
Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-019-09295-0 · Cited by 105
Toward a new political regime in Turkey: From competitive toward full authoritarianism
Çalışkan, K. (2018) · New Perspectives on Turkey · doi:10.1017/npt.2018.10 · Cited by 104
Legislatures and Legislative Politics Without Democracy
Gandhi, J., Noble, B., & Svolik, M. W. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414020919930 · Cited by 112
The noble west and the dirty rest? Western democracy promoters and illiberal regional powers
Börzel, T. A. (2015) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.1000312 · Cited by 102
Explanations of Institutional Change: Reflecting on a “Missing Diagonal”
Gerschewski, J. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000751 · Cited by 119
State capacity and the paradox of authoritarian elections
Seeberg, M. B. (2014) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.960210 · Cited by 104
Neither repression nor concession? A regime's attrition against mass protests
Hei, S. Y. W., & Wai, E. (2017) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321716674024 · Cited by 72
Coming together or drifting apart? The EU’s political integration capacity in Eastern Europe
Börzel, T. A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2017) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1265574 · Cited by 100
Laebens, M. G., & Öztürk, A. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414020926199 · Cited by 101
The Geography of Repression and Opposition to Autocracy
Bautista, M. A., González, F., Martínez, L. R., Muñoz, P., & Prem, M. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12614 · Cited by 96
Somer, M. (2016) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1259216 · Cited by 99
Democratic backsliding in the European Union: the role of the Hungarian-Polish coalition
Holesch, A., & Kyriazi, A. (2021) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1865319 · Cited by 110
“A major theory on the international determinants of regime change was elaborated by Levitsky and Way (2010) who argue that democratization depends on the density of economic, geopolitical, social, communication and civil society ties to the West (2010, 43-44) and its vulnerability to potential…”
BackgroundThe Political Economy of Liberal Democracy
MUKAND, S. W., & Rodrik, D. (2020) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/ueaa004 · Cited by 137
Hassan, M., Mattingly, D., & Nugent, E. R. (2022) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013321 · Cited by 113
Who Democratizes? Western-educated Leaders and Regime Transitions
Gift, T., & Krcmaric, D. (2015) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002715590878 · Cited by 100
Pion-Berlin, D., Esparza, D., & Grisham, K. E. (2012) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012450566 · Cited by 96
The Social Contract Revisited: Evidence from Communist and State Capitalist Economies
Cook, L. J., & Dimitrov, M. K. (2017) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2016.1267714 · Cited by 97
Measuring the Consolidation of Power in Nondemocracies
Gandhi, J., & Sumner, J. L. (2020) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/708683 · Cited by 96
Are democratic sanctions really counterproductive?
von Soest, C., & Wahman, M. (2014) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.888418 · Cited by 95
Power Tool or Dull Blade? Selectorate Theory for Autocracies
Gallagher, M. E., & Hanson, J. K. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-071213-041224 · Cited by 100
“…the authoritarian functions of institutions usually associated with democracies, including elections, legislatures, and rule of law (Schedler 2006; Brownlee 2007; Magaloni 2008b; Gandhi 2008; Gandhi and Przeworski 2007; Wang 2015; Moustafa and Ginsberg 2008; Moustafa 2007; Levitsky and Way 2010).”
BackgroundSocial services to claim legitimacy: comparing autocracies’ performance
Cassani, A. (2017) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2017.1304321 · Cited by 101
Responsive Authoritarianism in China -- a Review of Responsiveness in Xi and Hu Administrations
Qiaoan, R., & Teets, J. C. (2019) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-019-09640-z · Cited by 106
The Ballot and the Street: An Electoral Theory of Social Protest in Autocracies
Trejo, G. (2014) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714000863 · Cited by 97
Mass Organization and the Durability of Competitive Authoritarian Regimes
Handlin, S. P. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414016628186 · Cited by 92
Understanding Communist Collapse and Resilience
Dimitrov, M. K. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139565028.002 · Cited by 93
Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years On: The EU 's Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect
Grabbe, H. (2014) · JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.12174 · Cited by 94
State and Faith: Right-wing Populism and Nationalized Religion in Hungary
Bozóki, A., & Ádám, Z. (2016) · Intersections · doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v2i1.143 · Cited by 102
Could Populism Be Good for Constitutional Democracy?
Bugarič, B. (2019) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042927 · Cited by 94
Global Migration and Political Regime Type: A Democratic Disadvantage
Breunig, C., Cao, X., & Luedtke, A. (2012) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123412000051 · Cited by 92
Restraining the Huddled Masses: Migration Policy and Autocratic Survival
Miller, M. K., & Peters, M. E. (2018) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000680 · Cited by 94
Ruling Parties in Authoritarian Regimes: Rethinking Institutional Strength
Meng, A. (2019) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123419000115 · Cited by 90
Owen, C. (2020) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s0260210520000248 · Cited by 98
Un, K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108558648 · Cited by 94
Authoritarian Power Sharing: Concepts, Mechanisms, and Strategies
Meng, A., Paine, J., & Powell, R. (2022) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-052121-020406 · Cited by 102
Continuity despite change: Kenya's new constitution and executive power
Hassan, M. (2013) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.853174 · Cited by 91
Complexity and theories of change in international politics
Gunitsky, S. (2013) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971913000110 · Cited by 92
Opportunities and Constraints of Authoritarian Modernisation: Russian Policy Reforms in the 2000s
Гельман, В., & Starodubtsev, A. (2016) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2015.1113232 · Cited by 93
Russian patronage over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: implications for conflict resolution
Gerrits, A. W. M., & Bader, M. (2016) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2016.1166104 · Cited by 90
ECOWAS and the Restoration of Democracy in the Gambia
Hartmann, C. (2017) · Africa Spectrum · doi:10.1177/000203971705200104 · Cited by 95
Szostek, J. (2017) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161217743258 · Cited by 94
Performance and persistence of autocracies in comparison: introducing issues and perspectives
Croissant, A., & Wurster, S. (2013) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2013.773199 · Cited by 90
Lucardi, A. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414016666857 · Cited by 85
The Strategic Origins of Electoral Authoritarianism
Miller, M. K. (2017) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000394 · Cited by 87
Croese, S., & Pitcher, M. A. (2017) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098017732522 · Cited by 87
Stabilizing Authoritarian Rule: The Role of International Organizations
Cottiero, C., & Haggard, S. M. (2023) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqad031 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Way, Lucan A.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2010-08-16
- OpenAlex
- W4300022765
- Cited by
- 3,459
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 444 · 2025: 375 · 2024: 177 · 2023: 183 · 2022: 220 · 2021: 263 · 2020: 305 · 2019: 343 · 2018: 276 · 2017: 187 · 2016: 192 · 2015: 148 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 68
- FWCI
- 86.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- competitive authoritarianism, democratization, regime survival, state organization, incumbent firms, Eastern Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
