Cited by 83Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaCrime Patterns and Interventions

Adolescent Dating Abuse Perpetration: A Review of Findings, Methodological Limitations, and Suggestions For Future Research

Foshee, Vangie A., Matthew, Rebecca A.·2007·The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511816840.022

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 106 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foshee, V. A., & Matthew, R. A.
Venue
The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression
Published
2007-09-03
Pages
431-449
OpenAlex
W772297395
Cited by
83
References
106
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.71
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
adolescent dating violence, adolescents, intimate partner violence, methodological limitations, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review