Cited by 7,101Linguistics and Discourse AnalysisEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsLogic and Philosophy of Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Uses of Argument

Toulmin, Stephen E.·2003·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A central theme throughout the impressive series of philosophical books and articles Stephen Toulmin has published since 1948 is the way in which assertions and opinions concerning all sorts of topics, brought up in everyday life or in academic research, can be rationally justified. Is there one universal system of norms, by which all sorts of arguments in all sorts of fields must be judged, or must each sort of argument be judged according to its own norms? In The Uses of Argument (1958) Toulmin sets out his views on these questions for the first time. In spite of initial criticisms from logicians and fellow philosophers, The Uses of Argument has been an enduring source of inspiration and discussion to students of argumentation from all kinds of disciplinary background for more than forty years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511840005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Time and modality
Prior, A. N. (1957) · Cited by 670
Looking and seeing
Holmes, G. M. (1936) · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) · doi:10.1007/bf02973405 · Cited by 34
Misconceptions of Inference
Brown, D. G. (1955) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/15.6.135 · Cited by 2

Show all 3 references

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,017

Argumentative Interactions and the Social Construction of Knowledge
Baker, M. J. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_5 · Cited by 140
Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education
Nielsen, J. A. (2011) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x · Cited by 137
Student Difficulties in Socio‐scientific Argumentation and Decision‐making Research Findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines
Acar, Ö., Türkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2009) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690902991805 · Cited by 151
An Interactive Table for Supporting Participation Balance in Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning
Bachour, K., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2010.18 · Cited by 136
DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
Bart Verheij, A. (2003) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/13.3.319 · Cited by 136
Science Teacher Education and Professional Development in Argumentation
Zohar, A. E. (2007) · Science & technology education library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_12 · Cited by 142
Symmetric Argumentation Frameworks
Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., & Marquis, P. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11518655_28 · Cited by 136
Fixing the floating gap: The online encyclopaedia Wikipedia as a global memory place
Pentzold, C. (2009) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698008102055 · Cited by 147
From “reducing” to “coping with” uncertainty: reconceptualizing the central challenge in breast self-exams
Babrow, A. S., & Kline, K. N. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00112-x · Cited by 136
Measuring Lexical Diversity in Narrative Discourse of People With Aphasia
Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & West, T. M. (2013) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0083 · Cited by 148
Qualities of Historical Writing Instruction: A Comparative Case Study of Two Teachers’ Practices
Monte‐Sano, C. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831208319733 · Cited by 135
About the logical relations between cases and rules
Bart Verheij, A. (2008) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/978-1-58603-952-3-21 · Cited by 135
A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Education
Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2017) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/ejmste/80353 · Cited by 135
Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review
Papoutsi, C., Mattick, K. L., Pearson, M., Brennan, N., Briscoe, S., & Wong, G. (2017) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkx194 · Cited by 137
Argument in High School Genetics.
Jiménez‐Aleixandre, M. P., & Bugallo-Rodríguez, Á. (1997) · Cited by 133
Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition
Grasso, F., Cawsey, A. J., & Jones, R. B. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0429 · Cited by 133
Disentangling Professional Discretion: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach
Wallander, L., & Molander, A. (2014) · Professions and Professionalism · doi:10.7577/pp.808 · Cited by 147
A Proposed Instructional Theory for Integer Addition and Subtraction
Stephan, M. L., & Akyüz, D. (2012) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0428 · Cited by 139
ArgueTutor: An Adaptive Dialog-Based Learning System for Argumentation Skills
Wambsganss, T., Kueng, T., Soellner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445781 · Cited by 138
What Can Argumentation Tell Us About Epistemology?
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2007) · Science & technology education library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_4 · Cited by 131
Some Syntactic Approaches to the Handling of Inconsistent Knowledge Bases: A Comparative Study Part 1: The Flat Case
Salem Benferhat, A., Didier Dubois, A., & Prade, H. M. (1997) · Studia Logica · doi:10.1023/a:1004987830832 · Cited by 131
The Role of Moral Reasoning in Argumentation: Conscience, Character, and Care
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2007) · Science & technology education library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_10 · Cited by 139
Buyers' trust and mistrust in e-commerce platforms: a synthesizing literature review
Soleimani, M. (2022) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-021-00545-0 · Cited by 130
Argumentation Across the Curriculum
Wolfe, C. R. (2011) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088311399236 · Cited by 130
Teachers’ Stances and Practical Arguments Regarding a Science‐Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum: Part 1
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690600931020 · Cited by 130
Don't link me in
Parunak, H. V. D. (1991) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/122974.122998 · Cited by 130
LEARNING ARGUMENTATION SKILLS THROUGH INSTRUCTION IN SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES: THE EFFECT OF ABILITY LEVEL
Lin, S., & Mintzes, J. J. (2010) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9215-6 · Cited by 150
Rainbow: A framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates
Baker, M. J., Andriessen, J. E. B., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M., & Quignard, M. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9022-4 · Cited by 137
Technology-Mediated Writing Assessments: Principles and Processes
Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., McCarthey, S. J., Vojak, C., & Kline, S. M. (2011) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2011.04.007 · Cited by 133
The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation
Wolfe, C. R., & Britt, M. A. (2008) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780701527674 · Cited by 128
Micropublications: a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications
Clark, T., Ciccarese, P., & Goble, C. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Semantics · doi:10.1186/2041-1480-5-28 · Cited by 149
Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1988) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/bf00178026 · Cited by 128
Empowering Education: Teaching Argumentative Writing to Cultural Minority Middle-School Students
Yeh, S. S. (1998) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte19983912 · Cited by 129
Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols
McBurney, P., Parsons, S., & Wooldridge, M. (2002) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.1145/544741.544836 · Cited by 128
Relevance of Context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage
Rigotti, E. (2007) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-007-9034-2 · Cited by 127
Arguing for Experimental “Facts” in Science
Thompson, D. K. (1993) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088393010001004 · Cited by 127
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme
Bart Verheij, A. (2005) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-005-4421-z · Cited by 126
Micro‐Level Discursive Strategies for Constructing Shared Views around Strategic Issues in Team Meetings
Kwon, W., Clarke, I., & Wodak, R. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12036 · Cited by 134
Arguing the Value of Virtual Worlds: Patterns of Discursive Sensemaking of an Innovative Technology1
Berente, N., Hansen, S., Pike, J. C., & Bateman, P. J. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23042804 · Cited by 137
Understanding and improving automated collaborative filtering systems
Konstan, J. A., & Herlocker, J. L. (2000) · Cited by 125
A Comparison of the Collaborative Scientific Argumentation Practices of Two High and Two Low Performing Groups
Sampson, V. D., & Clark, D. B. (2009) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9146-9 · Cited by 124
Invention in Rhetoric and Composition
Goggin, M. D. (2005) · Freshman English news · Cited by 124
Scientific method and the adversary model: Some preliminary thoughts.
Levine, M. (1974) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0037627 · Cited by 124
The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea
Jho, H., Yoon, H., & Kim, M. (2013) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9652-z · Cited by 141
A hybrid rule – neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia
Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M., & Lewis, B. (1999) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1023/a:1008325826599 · Cited by 123
Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: Supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication
Shipman, F. M., III, & McCall, R. J. (1997) · Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing · doi:10.1017/s089006040000192x · Cited by 123
Scaffolded Inquiry-Based Instruction with Technology: A Signature Pedagogy for STEM Education
Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2012.658733 · Cited by 122
Why things happen – Developing the critical realist view of causal mechanisms
Mingers, J., & Standing, C. (2017) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.07.001 · Cited by 146
Levels of explainable artificial intelligence for human-aligned conversational explanations
Dazeley, R., Vamplew, P. W., Foale, C., Young, C., Aryal, S., & Cruz, F. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103525 · Cited by 138
Using argumentation vee diagrams (AVDs) for promoting argument-counterargument integration in reflective writing.
Nussbaum, E. M. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.549 · Cited by 121
Creating Opportunities for Students to Show What They Know: The Role of Scaffolding in Assessment Tasks
Kang, H., Thompson, J. J., & Windschitl, M. (2014) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21123 · Cited by 121
Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment
Bacha, N. N. (2010) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001 · Cited by 127
Human Decision Making and Recommender Systems
Chen, L., de Gemmis, M., Felfernig, A., Lops, P., Ricci⋆, F., & Semeraro, G. M. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2533670.2533675 · Cited by 134
A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence
Bex, F., Koppen, P. J. V., Prakken, H., & Bart Verheij, A. (2010) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-010-9092-x · Cited by 120
Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence
Reed, C., Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888907001051 · Cited by 120
Support in Abstract Argumentation
Guido Boella, A., Gabbay, D. M., van der Torre, L., & Villata, S. (2010) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-111 · Cited by 120
ToolSHeDTM
Cooke, T., Lingard, H. C., Blismas, N. G., & Stranieri, A. (2008) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/09699980810886847 · Cited by 120
A Comparative Analysis of Online Discussion Participation Protocols
Moore, J. L., & Marra, R. M. (2005) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2005.10782456 · Cited by 120
Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyse and support experiential learning in early design episodes
Stumpf, S., & McDonnell, J. T. (2002) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00020-5 · Cited by 120
From Habermas's communicative theory to practice on the internet
Heng, M. S. H., & de Moor, A. (2003) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2003.00144.x · Cited by 120
Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in Second Life
Jamaludin, A. B., Chee, Y. S., & Ho, C. M. L. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.009 · Cited by 119
Framing the Wars in the Gulf and in Bosnia: The Rhetorical Definitions of the Western Power Leaders in Action
Kuusisto, R. (1998) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343398035005004 · Cited by 119
Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis
Lumpe, A. T., & Staver, J. R. (1995) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660320108 · Cited by 121
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
Bart Verheij, A. (2003) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00107-3 · Cited by 122
Learning to Teach Argumentation: Case Studies of Pre-service Secondary Science Teachers
Erduran, S., Ardaç, D., & Yakmacı-Güzel, B. (2006) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/ejmste/75442 · Cited by 118
A Science for Survival: Values and Conservation Biology
Barry, D., & Oelschlaeger, M. (1996) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030904-2.x · Cited by 118
The Qualitative Doctoral Dissertation Proposal
Kilbourn, B. (2006) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00660.x · Cited by 118
Principles of Automated Negotiation
Fatima, S. S., Kraus, S., & Wooldridge, M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511751691 · Cited by 118
Why Ask Why?
Cooper, M. M. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00203 · Cited by 116
Validity by Design
Mislevy, R. J. (2007) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x07311660 · Cited by 115
Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation
Veerman, A. L. (2000) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 116
Valorized Food Processing By-Products in the EU: Finding the Balance between Safety, Nutrition, and Sustainability
Rao, M., Bast, A., & de Boer, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084428 · Cited by 115
Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science
Simon, S. (2008) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/17437270802417176 · Cited by 131
An integrated tool set for software safety analysis
Fenelon, P., & McDermid, J. A. (1993) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/0164-1212(93)90029-w · Cited by 115
How humans learn to think mathematically: exploring the three worlds of mathematics
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5072 · Cited by 114
Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2012) · Cited by 114
Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020
Visnovitz, P., & Jenne, E. K. (2021) · Comparative European Politics · doi:10.1057/s41295-021-00256-3 · Cited by 114
Lakatos’ Scientific Research Programmes as a Framework for Analysing Informal Argumentation about Socio‐scientific Issues
Chang, S., & Chiu, M. (2008) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690701534582 · Cited by 133
Proof validation in real analysis: Inferring and checking warrants
Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2005) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.03.003 · Cited by 128
Sourcing while reading divergent expert accounts: Pathways from views of knowing to written argumentation
Barzilai, S., Tzadok, E., & Eshet‐Alkalai, Y. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9359-4 · Cited by 125
A method for revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes
Knipping, C. (2008) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0095-y · Cited by 113
Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld
Lajoie, S. P., Guerrera, C., Munsie, S. D., & Lavigne, N. C. (2001) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/a:1003996000775 · Cited by 113
Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts
Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2012) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9162-z · Cited by 116
Informal Reasoning and Subject Matter Knowledge in the Solving of Economics Problems by Naive and Novice Individuals
Voss, J. F., Blais, J., Means, M. L., Greene, T. R., & Ahwesh, E. (1986) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0303_7 · Cited by 113
The Nature of Elementary Student Science Discourse in the Context of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach
Cavagnetto, A. R., Hand, B. M., & Norton‐Meier, L. A. (2009) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690802627277 · Cited by 115
The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework: Assessing Scientific Reasoning
Brown, N. J. S., Furtak, E. M., Timms, M. J., Nagashima, S. O., & Wilson, M. R. (2010) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2010.530551 · Cited by 112
The impact of multimodal collaborative virtual environments on learning: A gamified online debate
Doumanis, I., Economou, D., Sim, G., & Porter, S. B. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.017 · Cited by 126
Evidence-Centered Design for Simulation-Based Assessment
Mislevy, R. J. (2013) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-13-00213 · Cited by 115
THE PLACE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN EDUCATION RESEARCH
Andrews, R. (2005) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00303.x · Cited by 112
Improving Students' Evaluation of Informal Arguments
Larson, A. A., Britt, M. A., & Kurby, C. A. (2009) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.3200/jexe.77.4.339-366 · Cited by 118
Toward a logic of good reasons
Fisher, W. R. (1978) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335637809383443 · Cited by 112
Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test
Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.05.005 · Cited by 111
How do teachers reason about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teachers’ practical knowledge
Gholami, K., & Husu, J. (2010) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.001 · Cited by 124
Becoming a graduate: the warranting of an emergent identity
Holmes, L. (2015) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-08-2013-0100 · Cited by 111
Validation of rating processes within an argument-based framework
Knoch, U., & Chapelle, C. A. (2017) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532217710049 · Cited by 116
Hard cases: A procedural approach
Hage, J. C., Leenes, R. E., & Lodder, A. R. (1994) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/bf00871759 · Cited by 111
Evaluation as Practical Hermeneutics
Schwandt, T. A. (1997) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/135638909700300105 · Cited by 111
Comparative Understanding of School Subjects: Past, Present, and Future
Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. A. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075002125 · Cited by 111
Subjective Knowledge and Fear Appeal Effectiveness: Implications for Message Design
Nabi, R. L., Roskos‐Ewoldsen, D. R., & Carpentier, F. R. D. (2008) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410230701808327 · Cited by 111
Reasoning with Logic Programming
Alferes, J. J., Pereira, L. M., Siekmann, J., & Carbonell, J. (1996) · Cited by 111

Authors: Toulmin, S. E.
Affiliations: University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author: Toulmin, Stephen E.
Venue: Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Published: 2003-07-07
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511840005
OpenAlex: W1997210479
Cited by: 7,101
References: 3
Citations by year: 2026: 202 · 2025: 197 · 2024: 170 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 156 · 2021: 271 · 2020: 306 · 2019: 294 · 2018: 260 · 2017: 298 · 2016: 283 · 2015: 304 · 2014: 356 · 2013: 333 · 2012: 304
FWCI: 324.88
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 3256 d)
Locations: Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
Keywords: Stephen Toulmin, argumentation theory, rational justification, opinion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Uses of Argument

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks