Cited by 7,101Linguistics and Discourse AnalysisEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsLogic and Philosophy of Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Uses of Argument

Toulmin, Stephen E.·2003·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A central theme throughout the impressive series of philosophical books and articles Stephen Toulmin has published since 1948 is the way in which assertions and opinions concerning all sorts of topics, brought up in everyday life or in academic research, can be rationally justified. Is there one universal system of norms, by which all sorts of arguments in all sorts of fields must be judged, or must each sort of argument be judged according to its own norms? In The Uses of Argument (1958) Toulmin sets out his views on these questions for the first time. In spite of initial criticisms from logicians and fellow philosophers, The Uses of Argument has been an enduring source of inspiration and discussion to students of argumentation from all kinds of disciplinary background for more than forty years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511840005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Time and modality
Prior, A. N. (1957) · Cited by 670
Looking and seeing
Holmes, G. M. (1936) · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) · doi:10.1007/bf02973405 · Cited by 34
Misconceptions of Inference
Brown, D. G. (1955) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/15.6.135 · Cited by 2

Show all 3 references

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,017

Making the Pitch: Examining Dialogue and Revisions in Entrepreneurs' Pitch Decks
Spinuzzi, C., Nelson, S., Thomson, K. S., Lorenzini, F., French, R. A., Pogue, G. P., Burback, S. D., & Momberger, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2014.2342354 · Cited by 81
Transaction Cost Economics As a Constructive Stakeholder Theory
Ketokivi, M. A., & Mahoney, J. T. (2015) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2015.0133 · Cited by 80
Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of transactivity
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K. M., & Fischer, F. (2016) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9380-2 · Cited by 85
Validation of Automated Scoring for a Formative Assessment that Employs Scientific Argumentation
Mao, L., Liu, O. L., Roohr, K. C., Belur, V. K., Mulholland, M., Lee, H., & Pallant, A. (2018) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2018.1427570 · Cited by 80
Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking
Nussbaum, E. M. (2020) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1845173 · Cited by 103
Influence of Scaffolding on Information Literacy and Argumentation Skills in Virtual Field Trips and Problem-Based Learning for Scientific Problem Solving
Kim, N. J., Vicentini, C. R., & Belland, B. R. (2021) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10145-y · Cited by 92
Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: a Review of Instructional Approaches
Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2 · Cited by 120
Identification of informal reasoning fallacies as a function of epistemological level, grade level, and cognitive ability.
Weinstock, M. P., Neuman, Y., & Glassner, A. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.327 · Cited by 80
IMPACT OF A REPRESENTATIONAL APPROACH ON STUDENTS’ REASONING AND CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN LEARNING MECHANICS
Sutopo, S., & Waldrip, B. G. (2013) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9431-y · Cited by 80
Representing Epistemic Uncertainty by Means of Dialectical Argumentation
McBurney, P., & Parsons, S. (2001) · Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1023/a:1016757315265 · Cited by 80
A Review of Uncertainty Handling Formalisms
Parsons, S., & Hunter, A. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49426-x_2 · Cited by 80
Emotion as an Argumentation Engine: Modeling the Role of Emotion in Negotiation
Martinovski, B., & Mao, W. (2009) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9153-7 · Cited by 79
A Methodology for Security Classification applied to Smart Grid Infrastructures
Shrestha, M., Johansen, C., Noll, J., & Roverso, D. (2020) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100342 · Cited by 79
Challenges for information technology supporting educational assessment
Webb, M., Gibson, D., & Forkosh‐Baruch, A. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12033 · Cited by 87
Competing expectations: the case of hydrogen storage technologies
van Lente, H., & Bakker, S. (2010) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.496283 · Cited by 79
Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models
Pallant, A., & Lee, H. (2014) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3 · Cited by 79
A natural language bipolar argumentation approach to support users in online debate interactions†
Cabrio, E., & Villata, S. (2013) · Argument & Computation · doi:10.1080/19462166.2013.862303 · Cited by 79
Research Evidence and School Board Deliberations
Asen, R., Gurke, D., Conners, P., Solomon, R., & Gumm, E. (2012) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/0895904811429291 · Cited by 79
Persuasive Negotiation for Autonomous Agents: A Rhetorical Approach
Ramchurn, S. D., Jennings, N. R., & Carles Sierra, A. (2003) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 79
Acquiring Intellectual Skills
Voss, J. F., Wiley, J., & Carretero, M. M. (1995) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001103 · Cited by 81
Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations
Simosi, M. (2003) · Argumentation · doi:10.1023/a:1024059024337 · Cited by 78
Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy
Aakhus, M. A., & Lewiński, M. (2016) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-016-9403-9 · Cited by 80
Logical Reasoning in Formal and Everyday Reasoning Tasks
Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C. J. M., & Goedhart, M. J. (2019) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-019-10039-8 · Cited by 108
Internal and external collaboration scripts in web-based science learning at schools
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2005) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1149293.1149336 · Cited by 78
The split-up system
Zeleznikow, J., & Stranieri, A. (1995) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1145/222092.222235 · Cited by 78
Research across the disciplines: a road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research
Mertz, M., Inthorn, J., Renz, G., Rothenberger, L. G., Salloch, S., Schildmann, J., Wöhlke, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2014) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-17 · Cited by 80
SCAFFOLDING STUDENTS' INFORMAL INFERENCE AND ARGUMENTATION
Ben‐Zvi, D. (2006) · Cited by 78
Composition Theory in the Eighties: Axiological Consensus and Paradigmatic Diversity
Fulkerson, R. P. (1990) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357931 · Cited by 82
Does Argumentation Matter? A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Communication
Labrie, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2013) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.829018 · Cited by 77
Students Explaining Science—Assessment of Science Communication Competence
Kulgemeyer, C., & Schecker, H. P. (2013) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9354-1 · Cited by 77
A catalytic moment: The Greek crisis in the German financial press
Kutter, A. (2014) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926514536958 · Cited by 77
Decolonizing the Atmosphere: The Climate Justice Movement on Climate Debt
Warlenius, R. (2017) · The Journal of Environment & Development · doi:10.1177/1070496517744593 · Cited by 77
Cultural Differences in the Persuasiveness of Evidence Types and Evidence Quality
Hornikx, J., & Hoeken, H. (2007) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750701716578 · Cited by 77
Online Ethos
Warnick, B. (2004) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764204267273 · Cited by 77
Improving critical thinking using web based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback
Butchart, S., Forster, D. J., Gold, I., Bigelow, J., Korb, K. B., Oppy, G., & Serrenti, A. (2009) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1154 · Cited by 77
Learning Science through Creating a ‘Slowmation’: A case study of preservice primary teachers
HOBAN, G. F., & Nielsen, W. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.670286 · Cited by 77
Runtime Certification
Rushby, J. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89247-2_2 · Cited by 77
An analysis of children's construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions
Masón, L. (1996) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/0951839960090404 · Cited by 77
Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement
Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. M. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003 · Cited by 84
Rationales Provided for Risk Assessments and for Recommended Interventions in Child Protection: A Comparison between Canadian and Israeli Professionals
Benbenishty, R. (2003) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.2.137 · Cited by 77
Software Engineering Using RATionale
Burge, J. E., & Brown, D. C. (2007) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.05.004 · Cited by 76
Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion
Walton, D. (2006) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.016 · Cited by 76
On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments
Katzav, J., & Reed, C. (2004) · Argumentation · doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024044.34360.82 · Cited by 76
Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems that Support Mediators: A Case Study of the Family_Winner System
Bellucci, E., & Zeleznikow, J. (2005) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-006-9013-1 · Cited by 76
Using a modified argument-driven inquiry to promote elementary school students’ engagement in learning science and argumentation
Chen, H., Wang, H., Lu, Y., Lin, H., & Hong, Z. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1134849 · Cited by 76
The Function of Explicit Discourse Knowledge in the Development of Text Representations and Composing Strategies
Scardamalia, M., & Paris, P. (1985) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0201_1 · Cited by 76
Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con
Weiss, C. H. (1991) · Knowledge, technology & policy/Knowledge in society/Knowledge, technology, & policy · doi:10.1007/bf02692747 · Cited by 75
Can slope be negative in 3-space? Studying concept image of slope through collective definition construction
Moore-Russo, D. A., Conner, A., & Rugg, K. I. (2010) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-010-9277-y · Cited by 84
The epistemological stance between the knower and the known
Tirri, K. A., Husu, J., & Kansanen, P. (1999) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(99)00034-7 · Cited by 75
Linking the Thoughts: Analysis of Argumentation Structures in Scientific Publications
Kirschner, C., Eckle‐Kohler, J., & Gurevych, I. (2015) · Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining) · doi:10.3115/v1/w15-0501 · Cited by 75
Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services
Marchionini, G. (2009) · Cited by 75
Trust me if you can – neurophysiological insights on the influence of consumer impulsiveness on trustworthiness evaluations in online settings
Hubert, M., Hubert, M., Linzmajer, M., Riedl‬, R., & Kenning, P. H. (2018) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-12-2016-0870 · Cited by 85
Arguing about beliefs and actions
Fox, J., & Parsons, S. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49426-x_13 · Cited by 75
Analysis of Argumentative Writing at Two Grade Levels
Knudson, R. E. (1992) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.1992.9944434 · Cited by 86
Argumentation and Evidence
Upshur, R. E. G., & Colak, E. (2003) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1023/a:1026006801902 · Cited by 78
The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion
Hosman, L. A., Huebner, T. M., & Siltanen, S. A. (2002) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/026192702237954 · Cited by 74
Preservice Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs and Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues
Öztürk, N., & Tüzün, Ö. Y. (2016) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9548-4 · Cited by 89
The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9225-8 · Cited by 74
Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective Argumentation
Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2014.921131 · Cited by 74
Content-oriented discourse analysis and folk linguistics
Preston, D. R. (1994) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/0388-0001(94)90004-3 · Cited by 74
Professional Learning Portfolios for Argumentation in School Science
Simon, S., & Johnson, S. (2008) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690701854873 · Cited by 76
User acceptance of knowledge-based system recommendations: Explanations, arguments, and fit
Giboney, J. S., Brown, S. A., Lowry, P. B., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2015) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.02.005 · Cited by 71
Automated argument assistance for lawyers
Bart Verheij, A. (1999) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1145/323706.323714 · Cited by 72
Groupware for developing critical discussion skills
Suthers, D., & Weiner, A. W. (1995) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/222020.222826 · Cited by 74
State-of-the-Art: The Structure of Argumentation
Henkemans, A. F. S. (2000) · Argumentation · doi:10.1023/a:1007800305762 · Cited by 73
A logical analysis of burdens of proof
Prakken, H., & Giovanni Sartor, B. (2009) · Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) · doi:10.4324/9781315592015-15 · Cited by 73
The Carneades Argumentation FrameworkUsing Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions
Gordon, T. F., & Walton, D. (2006) · Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · Cited by 73
EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENGAGEMENT IN SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION AND CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE
Ogan‐Bekiroglu, F., & Eşkin, H. (2012) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9346-z · Cited by 79
Merging content analysis and the policy sciences: A system to discern policy-specific trends from news media reports
Howland, D., Becker, M. L., & Prelli, L. J. (2006) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-006-9016-5 · Cited by 73
Fourth and Fifth Graders Representing the Argument Structure in Written Texts
Chambliss, M. J., & Murphy, P. K. (2002) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3401_4 · Cited by 73
From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design
Prusak, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2011) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9335-0 · Cited by 73
Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication
Reed, C., & Walton, D. (2005) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-005-1729-x · Cited by 73
Teaching as a Master’s Level Profession in Finland: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Solutions
Kansanen, P. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7826-9_16 · Cited by 82
Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML
Reed, C. (2001) · Cited by 73
Before Name-Calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation
Habernal, I., Wachsmuth, H., Gurevych, I., & Stein, B. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1036 · Cited by 73
Exploiting Debate Portals for Semi-Supervised Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
Habernal, I., & Gurevych, I. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1255 · Cited by 75
Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-making on Energy-related Issues—Development of a measurement instrument
Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2014) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.920550 · Cited by 72
The cognitive structuring of patient delay in breast cancer
Facione, N. C., & Facione, P. A. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.014 · Cited by 74
The Significance of Distinctiveness: A Proposal for Rethinking Organizational Knowledge
Schreyögg, G., & Geiger, D. (2007) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508407071861 · Cited by 72
Constructing scientific explanations through premise–reasoning–outcome (PRO): an exploratory study to scaffold students in structuring written explanations
Tang, K. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1192309 · Cited by 72
Argument Mining from Speech: Detecting Claims in Political Debates
Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10384 · Cited by 78
Model-based learning: a synthesis of theory and research
Seel, N. M. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9507-9 · Cited by 78
Majority-Minority Influence: Identifying Argumentative Patterns and Predicting Argument-Outcome Links
Meyers, R. A., Brashers, D. E., & Hanner, J. (2000) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/50.4.3 · Cited by 72
On Organizational Apologia: A Reconceptualization
Rowland, R. C., & Jerome, A. M. (2004) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/14.3.191 · Cited by 72
Problem Oriented Software Engineering: Solving the Package Router Control Problem
Hall, J. G., Rapanotti, L., & Jackson, M. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2007.70769 · Cited by 72
Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction
Noroozi, O., & Mulder, M. (2017) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.20981 · Cited by 71
Argumentation Rationality of Management Decisions
Werder, A. V. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.5.672 · Cited by 71
The Added Value of Argumentation
Modgil, S., Toni, F., Bex, F., Ivan Bratko, A., Chesñevar, C. I., Dvořák, W., Falappa, M. A., Fan, X., Gaggl, S. A., García, A. J., et al. (2012) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_21 · Cited by 71
Reasoning as a Social Competence
Sperber, D., & Mercier, H. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511846427.016 · Cited by 74
Technical logic, rhetorical logic, and narrative rationality
Fisher, W. R. (1987) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/bf00127116 · Cited by 71
‘Warrant’ revisited: Integrating mathematics teachers’ pedagogical and epistemological considerations into Toulmin’s model for argumentation
Nardi, E., Biza, I., & Zachariades, T. (2011) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9345-y · Cited by 78
Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Stegmann, K. (2005) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.22318/cscl2005.717 · Cited by 72
The Role of Argument in Science Education
Osborne, J. F. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_29 · Cited by 75
Group Argument
Seibold, D. R., & Meyers, R. A. (2007) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496407301966 · Cited by 71
Writing Ethnographic Narratives
Brodkey, L. (1987) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088387004001002 · Cited by 71
Representing the structure of a legal argument
Marshall, C. (1989) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1145/74014.74031 · Cited by 71
Improving Written Argumentative Synthesis by Teaching the Integration of Conflicting Information from Multiple Sources
Mateos, M., Martín, E., Cuevas, I., Villalón, R., Martínez, I., & González-Lamas, J. (2018) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2018.1425300 · Cited by 70
The case for policy-relevant conservation science
Rose, D. C. (2014) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12444 · Cited by 70
I Agreed with What? Memory for Simple Argument Claims
Britt, M. A., Kurby, C. A., Dandotkar, S., & Wolfe, C. R. (2007) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638530701739207 · Cited by 68
MARGOT: A web server for argumentation mining
Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.050 · Cited by 70

Authors: Toulmin, S. E.
Affiliations: University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author: Toulmin, Stephen E.
Venue: Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Published: 2003-07-07
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511840005
OpenAlex: W1997210479
Cited by: 7,101
References: 3
Citations by year: 2026: 202 · 2025: 197 · 2024: 170 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 156 · 2021: 271 · 2020: 306 · 2019: 294 · 2018: 260 · 2017: 298 · 2016: 283 · 2015: 304 · 2014: 356 · 2013: 333 · 2012: 304
FWCI: 324.88
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 3256 d)
Locations: Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
Keywords: Stephen Toulmin, argumentation theory, rational justification, opinion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Uses of Argument

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks