The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive Load Theory
Abstract
Cognitive load theory (CLT) is one of the most important theories in educational psychology, a highly effective guide for the design of multimedia and other learning materials. This edited volume brings together the most prolific researchers from around the world who study various aspects of cognitive load to discuss its current theoretical as well as practical issues. The book is divided into three parts. The first part describes the theoretical foundations and assumptions of CLT, the second discusses the empirical findings about the application of CLT to the design of learning environments, and the third part concludes the book with discussions and suggestions for new directions for future research. It aims to become the standard handbook in CLT for researchers and graduate students in psychology, education, and educational technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2014) · The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.005 · Cited by 1,976
Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86
Young, J. Q., Van Merrienboer, J., Durning, S., & Ten Cate, O. (2014) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2014.889290 · Cited by 935
Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning
Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006 · Cited by 550
The future of student self-assessment: a review of known unknowns and potential directions.
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2 · Cited by 388
Noh, J., & Lee, J. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09708-w · Cited by 207
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Gilabert, R. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000339 · Cited by 181
Subgoals, Context, and Worked Examples in Learning Computing Problem Solving
Morrison, B. B., Margulieux, L. E., & Guzdial, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/2787622.2787733 · Cited by 174
Differentiating Different Types of Cognitive Load: a Comparison of Different Measures
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9404-8 · Cited by 153
Measuring cognitive load in introductory CS: adaptation of an instrument
Morrison, B. B., Dorn, B., & Guzdial, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research · doi:10.1145/2632320.2632348 · Cited by 147
Skulmowski, A., Pradel, S., Kühnert, T., Brunnett, G., & Rey, G. D. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.011 · Cited by 136
Measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning: a comparison of different objective measures
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9413-5 · Cited by 98
Employing Consumer Wearables to Detect Office Workers' Cognitive Load for Interruption Management
Schaule, F., Johanssen, J. O., Bruegge, B., & Loftness, V. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3191764 · Cited by 77
Tugtekin, U., & Odabasi, H. F. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10912-0 · Cited by 55
Anstey Watkins, J., Goudge, J., Gómez-Olivé, F. X., Huxley, C., Dodd, K., & Griffiths, F. (2018) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000543 · Cited by 45
Benefits of guided self-management of attention on learning accounting.
Sithole, S. T. M., Chandler, P., Abeysekera, I., & Paas, F. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000127 · Cited by 42
Wangwiwattana, C., Ding, X., & Larson, E. C. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3161164 · Cited by 26
What Needs Attention? Prioritizing Drivers of Developers' Trust and Adoption of Generative AI
Choudhuri, R., Trinkenreich, B., Pandita, R., Kalliamvakou, E., Steinmacher, I., Gerosa, M., Sanchez, C., & Sarma, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.17418 · Cited by 14
The Distributed Practice Effect on Classroom Learning: A Meta-Analytic Review of Applied Research
Mawson, R. D., & Kang, S. H. K. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15060771 · Cited by 14
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
Green STEM to Improve Mathematics Proficiency: ESA Mission Space Lab
Garcia-Piqueras, M., & Ruiz-Gallardo, J.-R. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9172066 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2010-04-26
- OpenAlex
- W261871827
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
