Cited by 99Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning: a comparison of different objective measures

Korbach, Andreas, Brünken, Roland, Park, Babette·2017·Instructional Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11251-017-9413-5

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Korbach et al. (2017) showed that the rhythm method was sensitive to hypothesised differences in cognitive load between a mental animation group, a seductive detail group and a control group.

    “Korbach et al. (2017) showed that this technique was sensitive to hypothesised differences in cognitive load between a mental animation group, a seductive detail group and a control group.”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Korbach et al. (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B.
Affiliations
Saarland University (DE)
Corresponding author
Korbach, Andreas
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2017-04-28
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
515-536
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2607527491
Cited by
98
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01PL12057)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
cognitive load, multimedia learning, seductive details, eye movements, rhythm method, cognitive effort, task difficulty, retention, comprehension, subjective ratings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review