The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ideology, Power and Prehistory
Abstract
This book starts from the premise that methodology - the procedures for obtaining an 'objective' knowledge of the past - has always dominated archaeology to the detriment of broader social theory. It argues that social theory is archaeological theory, and that past failure to recognise this has resulted in disembodied archaeological theory and weak disciplinary practice. Ideology, Power and Prehistory therefore seeks to reinstate the primacy of social theory and the social nature of the past worlds that archaeologists seek to understand. The contributors to this book argue that past peoples, the creators of the archaeological records, should be understood as actively manipulating their own material world to represent and misrepresent their own and others' interests. Thus the concepts of ideology and power, long discussed in social and political science yet largely ignored by archaeologists, must henceforward play a central role in our understanding of the past as a social creation. Archaeologists must now consider how the material remains they study were used to create images by past societies, which do not simply mirror or reflect but actively orientate the nature of these societies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Spencer-Wood (1999d:178-0) critiqued the widespread top-down androcentric Weberian view of power only as domination and built on Miller and Tilley's two types of power, along with Carole Crumley's (1987) theorizing of heterarchy, to create a more inclusive both/and heterarchical model of multiple intersecting types of powers employed both by individuals and by social groups: dominating ''powers”
From Introduction to Archaeologies Special Issue on Intersectionality Theory and Research in Historical Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as Miller & Tilley, 1984
In the citing paper
“Theorizing heterarchical power dynamics in interpersonal or intergroup relationships of any kind requires recognizing that there are different types and different scales of power that range from Weberian domination that Miller and Tilley (1984:5-8) called ''power over'' others to what they called ''power to'' create change, following Giddens' (1984:14-16) concept of individual agency.”
From Introduction to Archaeologies Special Issue on Intersectionality Theory and Research in Historical Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as Miller & Tilley, 1984
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weik, T. (1997) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/bf03373604 · Cited by 100
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2016) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-016-0356-3 · Cited by 48
Spencer-Wood, S. M., & Trunzo, J. M. C. (2022) · Archaeologies · doi:10.1007/s11759-022-09442-5 · Cited by 18
Zarankin, A., & Niro, C. (2009) · Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_6 · Cited by 12
Salerno, M. A. (2009) · Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_7 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, D., & Tilley, C.
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1984-05-03
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideology, Power and Prehistory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511897443
- The paper
- Miller, D., & Tilley, C. (1984). Ideology, Power and Prehistory. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511897443