Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries
Abstract
From 1998 to 2005, six elections took place in postcommunist Europe that had the surprising outcome of empowering the opposition and defeating authoritarian incumbents or their designated successors. Valerie J. Bunce and Sharon L. Wolchik compare these unexpected electoral breakthroughs. They draw three conclusions. First, the opposition was victorious because of the hard and creative work of a transnational network composed of local opposition and civil society groups, members of the international democracy assistance community and graduates of successful electoral challenges to authoritarian rule in other countries. Second, the remarkable run of these upset elections reflected the ability of this network to diffuse an ensemble of innovative electoral strategies across state boundaries. Finally, elections can serve as a powerful mechanism for democratic change. This is especially the case when civil society is strong, the transfer of political power is through constitutional means, and opposition leaders win with small mandates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After the coup, such experience in online activism would spread to other pockets of dissent across the country through either direct learning or indirect mirroring.
“After the coup, such experience in online activism would spread to other pockets of dissent across the country through either direct learning or indirect mirroring, as theorized in existing literature on protest diffusion (Bunce and Wolchik, 2011).”
From Democratic backsliding disrupted: The role of digitalized resistance in Myanmar (2024) · cites this paper as Bunce and Wolchik, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability
Gunitsky, S. (2015) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714003120 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
The Arab Spring: Why the Surprising Similarities with the Revolutionary Wave of 1848?
Weyland, K. (2012) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592712002873 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe
Greskovits, B. (2015) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12225 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection
Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-019-09295-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
What do we know about civil society and regime change thirty years after 1989?
Bernhard, M. (2020) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787160 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Democratic backsliding disrupted: The role of digitalized resistance in Myanmar
Ryan, M., & Tran, M. V. (2024) · Asian Journal of Comparative Politics · doi:10.1177/20578911221125511 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2011-06-30
- OpenAlex
- W1553666012
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 31.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Eastern European Communism and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- opposition parties, transnational networks, civil society, support for democracy, electoral strategy, democratic change, political transition, post-communist Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review