Cited by 567Political Conflict and GovernanceEastern European Communism and ReformsElectoral Systems and Political Participation

Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries

Bunce, Valerie J., Wolchik, Sharon L.·2011·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

From 1998 to 2005, six elections took place in postcommunist Europe that had the surprising outcome of empowering the opposition and defeating authoritarian incumbents or their designated successors. Valerie J. Bunce and Sharon L. Wolchik compare these unexpected electoral breakthroughs. They draw three conclusions. First, the opposition was victorious because of the hard and creative work of a transnational network composed of local opposition and civil society groups, members of the international democracy assistance community and graduates of successful electoral challenges to authoritarian rule in other countries. Second, the remarkable run of these upset elections reflected the ability of this network to diffuse an ensemble of innovative electoral strategies across state boundaries. Finally, elections can serve as a powerful mechanism for democratic change. This is especially the case when civil society is strong, the transfer of political power is through constitutional means, and opposition leaders win with small mandates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511977404

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After the coup, such experience in online activism would spread to other pockets of dissent across the country through either direct learning or indirect mirroring.

    “After the coup, such experience in online activism would spread to other pockets of dissent across the country through either direct learning or indirect mirroring, as theorized in existing literature on protest diffusion (Bunce and Wolchik, 2011).”

    From Democratic backsliding disrupted: The role of digitalized resistance in Myanmar (2024) · cites this paper as Bunce and Wolchik, 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2011-06-30
OpenAlex
W1553666012
Cited by
567
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
FWCI
31.93
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Eastern European Communism and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
opposition parties, transnational networks, civil society, support for democracy, electoral strategy, democratic change, political transition, post-communist Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review