The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clandestine Political Violence
Abstract
Clandestine Political Violence compares four types of clandestine political violence: left-wing (in Italy and Germany), right-wing (in Italy), ethnonationalist (in Spain) and religious fundamentalist (in Islamist clandestine organizations). Oriented toward theory building, Della Porta develops her own definition of clandestine political violence. Building on the most recent developments in social movement studies, Della Porta proposes an original interpretative model. Using a unique research design, she singles out some common causal mechanisms at the onset, during the persistence and at the demise of clandestine political violence. The development of the phenomenon is located within the interactions among social movements, countermovements and the state. She pays particular attention to the ways different actors cognitively construct the reality they act upon. Based on original empirical research as well as existing research in many languages, this book is rich in empirical evidence on some of the most crucial cases of clandestine political violence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80966-1 · Cited by 7,457
Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226464 · Cited by 7,381
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
FEARON, J. D., & LAITIN, D. D. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000534 · Cited by 7,366
Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095581 · Cited by 6,548
Security: A New Framework for Analysis
Hampson, F. O., Buzan, B., Waever, O., & Wilde, J. D. (1998) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40203739 · Cited by 6,530
Greed and grievance in civil war
Collier, P. (2004) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpf064 · Cited by 6,101
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805431 · Cited by 5,558
Social Theory and Social Structure.
Stone, G. P., & Merton, R. K. (1958) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2390803 · Cited by 4,499
From Mobilization to Revolution
Tilly, C. (2017) · Collective Violence, Contentious Politics, and Social Change · doi:10.4324/9781315205021-5 · Cited by 3,999
Cited by
Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model.
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000062 · Cited by 522
How Insurgency Begins: Rebel Group Formation in Uganda and Beyond
Lewis, J. I. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108855969 · Cited by 98
Pearlman, W. (2021) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414020912281 · Cited by 50
Social media as public journalism? Protest reporting in the digital era
Pearce, S. C., & Rodgers, J. (2020) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12823 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- della Porta, D.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2013-04-05
- OpenAlex
- W165765878
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 163
- FWCI
- 15.99
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clandestine Political Violence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139043144
- The paper
- della Porta, D. (2013). Clandestine Political Violence. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139043144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
