The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation
Abstract
The central problem of social theory is 'structure and agency'. How do the objective features of society influence human agents? Determinism is not the answer, nor is conditioning as currently conceptualised. It accentuates the way structure and culture shape the social context in which individuals operate, but it neglects our personal capacity to define what we care about most and to establish a modus vivendi expressive of our concerns. Through inner dialogue, 'the internal conversation', individuals reflect upon their social situation in the light of current concerns and projects. On the basis of a series of unique, in-depth interviews, Archer identifies three distinctive forms of internal conversation. These govern agents' responses to social conditioning, their individual patterns of social mobility and whether or not they contribute to social stability or change. Thus the internal conversation is seen as being the missing link between society and the individual, structure and agency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity
Archer, M. S. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139108058 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationHealth lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure
Cockerham, W. C. (2005) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650504600105 · Cited by 979
Kontos, P. C., & Poland, B. D. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-1 · Cited by 760
Academic identities under threat?
Clegg, S. (2008) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920701532269 · Cited by 571
A Stupidity‐Based Theory of Organizations
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x · Cited by 534
Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research
Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166 · Cited by 249
Theorising student engagement in higher education
Kahn, P. E. (2014) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3121 · Cited by 197
Assessing agency of university students: validation of the AUS Scale
Jääskelä, P., Poikkeus, A.-M., Vasalampi, K., Valleala, U. M., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130693 · Cited by 149
A systematic review of student agency in international higher education
Inouye, K., Lee, S., & Oldac, Y. I. (2023) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00952-3 · Cited by 114
Shilling, C. (2010) · Sport, Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573321003683786 · Cited by 99
Archaeology and the “Savage Slot”: Displacement and Emplacement in the Premodern World
COBB, C. R. (2005) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2005.107.4.563 · Cited by 83
Advance care planning with patients who have end-stage kidney disease: a systematic realist review
O'Halloran, P., Noble, H., Norwood, K., Maxwell, P., Shields, J., Fogarty, D., Murtagh, F., Morton, R., & Brazil, K. (2018) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.008 · Cited by 71
Archer, M. S. (2007) · The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture · doi:10.1002/9780470996744.ch2 · Cited by 59
Self-citationWarren, E., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Viner, R., & Bonell, C. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04688-2 · Cited by 32
Brook, P. (2013) · Culture and Organization · doi:10.1080/14759551.2013.827423 · Cited by 30
Kühn, S., Fernyhough, C., Alderson-Day, B., & Hurlburt, R. T. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01393 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, M. S.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2003-08-28
- OpenAlex
- W585970617
- Cited by
- 2,456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.63
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.