CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,649Logic and Philosophy of SciencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationAcademic integrity and plagiarism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

Lakatos, I.·1970·Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 153 references

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Le Roy, 1901, Un Positivisme Nouveau, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 9, 138
  2. Maxwell, 1871, Theory of Heat
  3. Thomson, 1929, On the Waves associated with β-rays, and the Relation between Free Electrons and their Waves, Philosophical Magazine, 7, 405
  4. Poincaré, 1902, La Science et l'Hypothèse
  5. Juhos, 1966, Über die empirische Induktion, Studium Generale, 19, 259
  6. Hevesy, 1913, Letter to Rutherford, 14.10.1913, XLII
  7. Lorentz, 1892, The Relative Motion of the Earth and the Ether, Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, I, 74
  8. Musgrave, 1969, Impersonal Knowledge
  9. Popper, The Aim of Science, Ratio, 1, 24–35
  10. Lorentz, 18926, Stokes' Theory of Aberration, Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, I, 97-103
  11. Prout, 1815, On the Relation between the Specific Gravities of Bodies in their Gaseous State and the Weights of their Atoms, Annals of Philosophy, 6, 321
  12. Mott, 1933, Handbuch der Physik, 24, 785–841
  13. Crookes, 1886, Report of British Association, 558
  14. Whewell, 1860, On the Philosophy of Discovery, Chapters Historical and Critical
  15. Leibnitz, 1678, Letter to Conring, 19
  16. Russell, 1914, The Philosophy of Bergson
  17. Popper, 1968, Problems in the Philosophy of Science, 88–102
  18. Keynes, 1921, A Treatise on Probability
  19. Agassi, 1959, How are Facts Discovered?, Impulse, 3, 2–4
  20. Grünbaum, 1960, The Duhemian Argument, Philosophy of Science, 11, 75–87
  21. Popper, 1934, Logik der Forschung
  22. Whittaker, 1947, From Euclid to Eddington
  23. Popkin, 1968, Problems in the Philosophy of Science, 1–28
  24. Lorentz, 1897, Concerning the Problem of the Dragging Along of the Ether by the Earth, Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, 6, 266
  25. Bohr, 1922, The Structure of the Atom
  26. Soddy, 1932, The Interpretation of the Atom
  27. Wu, 1966, Beta Decay
  28. Einstein, 1931, Gedenkworte auf Albert A. Michelson, Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie, 44, 658
  29. Bartley, 1968, Problems in the Philosophy of Science, 40–64
  30. Fresnel, 1818, Lettre à François Arago sur l'Influence du Mouvement Terrestre dans quelques Phénomènes Optiques, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 9, 57
  31. Poincaré, 1891, Les géométries non euclidiennes, Revue Générale des Sciences Pures et Appliquées, 2, 769
  32. Michelson, On the Application of Interference Methods to Spectroscopic Measurements, I-II, Philosophical Magazine, 31, 338
  33. Lorentz, 1895, Versucheiner Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern, 89-92
  34. Bohr, 1930, Chemistry and the Quantum Theory of Atomic Constitution, Journal of the Chemical Society, 1, 349
  35. Koestler, 1959, The Sleepwalkers
  36. Popper, 1965, Normal Science and ite Dangers, this volume, 51
  37. Agassi, 1964, The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, 189–211
  38. Lorentz, 1886, De l'Influence du Mouvement de la Terre sur les Phénomènes Lumineux, Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, 2, 297-358
  39. Lakatos, 1968, The Problem of Inductive Logic, 315–417
  40. Lakatos, 19686, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 69, 149
  41. Morley, 1904, Letter to Kelvin, Philosophical Magazine, 8, 753
  42. Pauli, 1958, Aufsätze und Vortrage über Physik und Erkenntnistheorie, 156
  43. Grünbaum, 1959, Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, 40–155
  44. Lakatos, 1971, PSA, 174
  45. Musgrave, 1974, The Philosophy of Sir Karl Popper
  46. Bohr, 19136, Letter to Rutherford, xxxviii
  47. Larmor, 1904, On the Ascertained Absence of Effects of Motion through the Aether, in Relation to the Constitution of Matter, and on the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Hypothesis, Philosophical Magazine, 6, 621
  48. Feyerabend, 1970, Against Method, Minnesota Studies for the Philosophy of Science, 4
  49. Runge, 1925, Äther und Relativitätstheorie, Die naturwissenschaften, 13, 440
  50. Einstein, 1909, Über die Entwicklung unserer Anschauungen über das Wesen und die Konstitution der Strahlung, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10, 817
  51. Popper, 19576, The Poverty of Historicism
  52. Quine, 1953, From a Logical Point of View
  53. Einstein, 1927, Neue Experimente über den Einfluss der Erdbewegung auf die Lichtgeschwindigkeit relativ zur Erde, Forschungen und Fortschritte, 3, 36
  54. Nagel, 1967, What is True and False in Science: Medawar ana the Anatomy of Research, Encounter, 29, 68–70
  55. Planck, 1900, Über eine Verbesserung der Wienschen Spektralgleichung, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, 2, 202
  56. Ter, 1067, The Old Quantum Theory
  57. Medawar, 1967, The Art of the Soluble
  58. Hempel, 1952, Some Theses on Empirical Certainty, The Review of Metaphysics, 5, 620
  59. Marignac, Prout's Hypothesis, 48–58
  60. Planck, 1947, Scientific Autobiography
  61. Popper, 1968, Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Philosophy, 1, 25–53
  62. Synge, 1952, Effects of Acceleration in the Michelson-Morley Experiment, The Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, 26, 45-54
  63. Bemal, 1965, Science in History
  64. Meitner, 1933, Handbuch der Physik, 22, 118
  65. Davisson, 1937, Nobel Lecture
  66. Feyerabend, 1969, The nature and Function of Scientific Theory
  67. Lakatos, 19716, PSA, 91–135
  68. Stokes, 1845, On the Aberration of Light, Philosophical Magazine, 9–15
  69. Laplace, 1796, Exposition du Système du Monde

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4,649

Related

Metadata

Authors
Lakatos, I.
Venue
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
1970-09-02
Pages
91-196
DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009
OpenAlex
W256019955
Cited by
4,649
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 155 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 195 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 129
FWCI
84.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 16043 d)
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
falsification, scientific research programs, methodology of science, Karl Popper, philosophy of science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review