The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Creating the Kingdom of Ends
Abstract
Christine Korsgaard has become one of the leading interpreters of Kant's moral philosophy. She is identified with a small group of philosophers who are intent on producing a version of Kant's moral philosophy that is at once sensitive to its historical roots while revealing its particular relevance to contemporary problems. She rejects the traditional picture of Kant's ethics as a cold vision of the moral life which emphasises duty at the expense of love and value. Rather, Kant's work is seen as providing a resource for addressing not only the metaphysics of morals, but also for tackling practical questions about personal relations, politics, and everyday human interaction. This collection contains some of the finest current work on Kant's ethics and will command the attention of all those involved in teaching and studying moral theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556659 · Cited by 5,130
Dancy, J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0199270023.001.0001 · Cited by 1,677
Adherence, shared decision-making and patient autonomy
Sandman, L., Granger, B. B., Ekman, I., & Munthe, C. (2012) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-011-9336-x · Cited by 150
Shared decision-making and patient autonomy
Sandman, L., & Munthe, C. (2009) · Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics · doi:10.1007/s11017-009-9114-4 · Cited by 138
The philosophical basis of algorithmic recourse
Venkatasubramanian, S., & Alfano, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372876 · Cited by 114
Bayne, T. (2008) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00122.x · Cited by 107
Akrasia, Collective and Individual
Pettit, P. (2003) · Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0004 · Cited by 32
A way forward for responsibility in the age of AI
Gogoshin, D. L. (2025) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2312455 · Cited by 9
Walschots, M. (2023) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-023-00621-4 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Korsgaard, C. M.
- Venue
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1996-07-28
- OpenAlex
- W4242142861
- Cited by
- 1,633
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.