The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“Attention,”
Abstract
Introduction The essential claim of this chapter is that the concept of attention is necessary in order to understand virtually every aspect of second language acquisition (SLA), including the development of interlanguages (ILs) over time, variation within IL at particular points in time, the development of L2 influency, the role of individual differences such as motivation, aptitude and learning strategies in L2 learning, and the ways in which interaction, negotiation for meaning, and all forms of instruction contribute to language learning. The theoretical issues dealt with in this chapter are organized around the basic assumptions, definitions, and metaphors concerning attention in psychology and include the idea of attention as a limited capacity, the notion of selective attention, and the role of attention in action control, access to awareness, and learning. It turns out that, like most psychological concepts initially based on common experience, attention is not a unitary phenomenon, but refers to a variety of mechanisms. These include alertness, orientation, preconscious registration (detection without awareness), selection (detection with awareness within selective attention), facilitation, and inhibition. This does not diminish the centrality of attention, in its several manifestations, for learning. Although recent evidence, discussed towards the end of this chapter, indicates the possibility of some unattended learning, this appears limited in scope and relevance for SLA. There is no doubt that attended learning is far superior, and for all practical purposes, attention is necessary for all aspects of L2 learning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Theoretical arguments can also be made for implicit and explicit feedback; implicit feedback caters to implicit learning whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt (2001) saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Schmidt (2001)
In the citing paper
“Therefore, in line with Schmidt's (2001) awareness hypothesis, motivation facilitates deeper processing of vocabulary learning at the cognitive level.”
From Incidental vocabulary learning from digital games: the predictive role of game playing time, foreign language motivation, and anxiety (2026) · cites this paper as Schmidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Indeed, Schmidt's noticing hypothesis (1990,1995,2001) has played an integral role in the interaction approach, with the claim that L2 learning does not occur without awareness.”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Schmidt 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
(2021) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal · Cited by 2,782
The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
Li, S. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x · Cited by 941
Sheen, Y. (2007) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x · Cited by 857
Implicit and Explicit Learning
DEKEYSER, R. M. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 · Cited by 842
Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, R.
- Corresponding author
- Schmidt, Richard
- ORCID
- Schmidt, Richard
- Venue
- Cognition and Second Language Instruction
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-11-29
- Pages
- 3-32
- OpenAlex
- W1573000476
- Cited by
- 1,322
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 34.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- attention, second language acquisition, interlanguage development, selective attention, limited capacity, alertness, orientation, facilitation, inhibition, individual differences in language learning, motivation, aptitude, learning strategies, interaction in language learning, negotiation of meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review