The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“Attention,”
Abstract
Introduction The essential claim of this chapter is that the concept of attention is necessary in order to understand virtually every aspect of second language acquisition (SLA), including the development of interlanguages (ILs) over time, variation within IL at particular points in time, the development of L2 influency, the role of individual differences such as motivation, aptitude and learning strategies in L2 learning, and the ways in which interaction, negotiation for meaning, and all forms of instruction contribute to language learning. The theoretical issues dealt with in this chapter are organized around the basic assumptions, definitions, and metaphors concerning attention in psychology and include the idea of attention as a limited capacity, the notion of selective attention, and the role of attention in action control, access to awareness, and learning. It turns out that, like most psychological concepts initially based on common experience, attention is not a unitary phenomenon, but refers to a variety of mechanisms. These include alertness, orientation, preconscious registration (detection without awareness), selection (detection with awareness within selective attention), facilitation, and inhibition. This does not diminish the centrality of attention, in its several manifestations, for learning. Although recent evidence, discussed towards the end of this chapter, indicates the possibility of some unattended learning, this appears limited in scope and relevance for SLA. There is no doubt that attended learning is far superior, and for all practical purposes, attention is necessary for all aspects of L2 learning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Theoretical arguments can also be made for implicit and explicit feedback; implicit feedback caters to implicit learning whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt (2001) saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Schmidt (2001)
In the citing paper
“Therefore, in line with Schmidt's (2001) awareness hypothesis, motivation facilitates deeper processing of vocabulary learning at the cognitive level.”
From Incidental vocabulary learning from digital games: the predictive role of game playing time, foreign language motivation, and anxiety (2026) · cites this paper as Schmidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Indeed, Schmidt's noticing hypothesis (1990,1995,2001) has played an integral role in the interaction approach, with the claim that L2 learning does not occur without awareness.”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Schmidt 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
(2021) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal · Cited by 2,782
The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
Li, S. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x · Cited by 941
Sheen, Y. (2007) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x · Cited by 857
Implicit and Explicit Learning
DEKEYSER, R. M. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 · Cited by 842
Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x · Cited by 746
Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000094 · Cited by 752
Engagement in language learning: a systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211001289 · Cited by 677
Ellis, N. C. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/aml015 · Cited by 639
“Schmidt summarized it as: ‘since many features of L2 input are likely to be infrequent, non-salient, and communicatively redundant, intentionally focused attention may be a practical (though not theoretical) necessity for successful language learning’ (Schmidt 2001).”
BackgroundIndividual Differences in Second Language Learning
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch18 · Cited by 563
ONE SIZE FITS ALL?: Recasts, Prompts, and L2 Learning
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106060268 · Cited by 541
Feedback, Noticing and Instructed Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami051 · Cited by 536
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., Plonsky, L., Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410604651 · Cited by 549
Instructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement
Doughty, C. J. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch10 · Cited by 519
INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK AND INSTRUCTIONAL COUNTERBALANCE
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106060128 · Cited by 506
Incidental and Intentional Learning
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch12 · Cited by 532
Gass, S. M. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch9 · Cited by 542
Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction
Swan, M. (2005) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami013 · Cited by 481
Focus on form: A critical review
Ellis, R. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816628627 · Cited by 417
“Schmidt (1994, 2001) considered that in general learning is only possible if attention to form is conscious, i.e. ‘noticing’ occurs.”
BackgroundEllis, R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990544 · Cited by 479
Recasts in the Adult English L2 Classroom: Characteristics, Explicitness, and Effectiveness
LOEWEN, S., & PHILP, J. (2006) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x · Cited by 408
Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going
Taguchi, N. (2015) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444814000263 · Cited by 293
Attention and Memory during SLA
Robinson, P. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch19 · Cited by 402
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377
“…variables pertaining to interaction on (a) discourse moves such as modified output (Swain 1985, 1995, 2005), (b) cognitive constructs such as noticing (Schmidt 1990, 1995, 2001), and (c) most importantly, L2 development and acquisition (see Mackey 1999; Spada & Lightbown 2009; Mackey 2012).”
BackgroundTask-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
Task‐Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues
Robinson, P. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x · Cited by 394
Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990519 · Cited by 344
“…in this study, does not mark past tense with morphological change (Cai, 2007 ); past tense marking thus remains especially diffi cult for Chinese EFL learners, owing arguably to expectancy, which is one of the factors that infl uences the noticing of grammatical features (Schmidt, 2001 ).”
BackgroundAutomaticity and Second Languages
Segalowitz, N. S. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch13 · Cited by 349
REEXAMINING THE ROLE OF RECASTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310606027x · Cited by 340
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168810383329 · Cited by 334
“The difficulty may derive from the fact that – from the perspective of information processing theory – our attentional capacity is limited and selective (Anderson, 1995; Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundGodfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263113000119 · Cited by 355
“Thus, using vocabulary as a test case, this study complements the existing empirical support from awareness studies for Schmidt’s noticing hypothesis by showing that not only more awareness but also more attention lead to more learning (Schmidt, 1994 , 1995 , 2001 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMetatalk in a Pair Work Activity: Level of Engagement and Implications for Language Development
Storch, N. (2008) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410802146644 · Cited by 329
“Researchers such as Robinson (1995), Schmidt (1990, 1995, 2001) and Skehan (1998), working from a cognitive theoretical perspective, claim that noticing a 0965-8416/08/02 095-20 $20.00/0 C© 2008 N. Storch LANGUAGE AWARENESS Vol. 17, No. 2, 2008 95 linguistic item in the input is a necessary, though…”
BackgroundInfluentialAPTITUDE AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
Robinson, P. (2005) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190505000036 · Cited by 187
“…Long, in press; VanPatten, 2004), and the cognitive processes they implicate (see e.g., Doughty, 2001; N. Ellis, 2001; Robinson, 1995b, 2001d; 2003a; Schmidt, 2001; Segalowitz & Freed, 2004), all have the effects they do in interaction with the patterns of abilities learners bring to those…”
BackgroundTeaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues
Taguchi, N. (2011) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190511000018 · Cited by 366
IDENTIFYING THE IMPACT OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNERS' RESPONSES ON ESL QUESTION DEVELOPMENT
McDonough, K. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050047 · Cited by 309
Ellis, N. C. (2008) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00716.x · Cited by 315
“…brings additional evidence to the attention of the learner by some means of focus on form (Doughty & Williams, 1998), form-focused instruction, or consciousness raising, this focusing of attention can help the learner notice aspects of linguistic form or form–function mapping (Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundTask-based language teaching theory and practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020) · Cited by 284
Uptake in Incidental Focus on Form in Meaning‐Focused ESL Lessons
Loewen, S. (2004) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00251.x · Cited by 270
THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE AGAINST RECASTS
Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000708 · Cited by 271
“…they can test their hypotheses about L2 forms and process the L2 syntactically (Swain, 1985 , 1995 , 2005 ), and to become aware of the gap between their interlanguage and the target language (Robinson, Mackey, Gass, & Schmidt, 2012 ; Schmidt, 1990 , 1993 , 1995 , 2001 ; Schmidt & Frota, 1986 ).”
BackgroundPosition paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward
Ellis, R. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000179 · Cited by 267
“Theoretical arguments can also be made for implicit and explicit feedback; implicit feedback caters to implicit learning whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt (2001) saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.”
BackgroundDIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF ORAL AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN THE ESL CLASSROOM
Sheen, Y. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990507 · Cited by 290
Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research
Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x · Cited by 267
Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lin, J.-J., & Lin, H. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359 · Cited by 262
“When these L2 vocabulary learning suggestions are applied in mobile learning, SMS/MMS may be used to deliver the most common L2 words based on the Noticing rules (Schmidt, 2001) and Push Mechanisms (Thornton & Houser, 2001, 2002, 2005) to fortify the explicit L2 vocabulary learning.”
BackgroundMethodShintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2013) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12029 · Cited by 260
“This is understandable for as Schmidt (2001) pointed out, attention is limited, selective and partially subject to voluntary control.”
BackgroundPEER INTERACTION AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR ACCURACY AND FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000356 · Cited by 298
“Corrective feedback effectiveness has been explained in the study of L2 acquisition through reference to the noticing hypothesis (Schmidt, 1994 , 2001 ), which claims that noticing is necessary and that “intake is what learners consciously notice” (Schmidt, 1990 , p. 149).”
BackgroundInstructed Second Language Acquisition
Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444347340.ch4 · Cited by 269
The Effects of Corpus Use on Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Multilevel Meta-analysis
Lee, H., Warschauer, M., & Lee, J. H. (2018) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amy012 · Cited by 282
Lee, S. (2007) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x · Cited by 131
Hulstijn, J. (2002) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/0267658302sr207oa · Cited by 250
“Section III discusses this view in the light of the Noticing Hypothesis (Schmidt, 1994a; 1994b; 2001) and rounds the article off with some final remarks.”
InfluentialCORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY IN INTERACTION-DRIVEN L2 LEARNING
Goo, J. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000149 · Cited by 257
6. CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN RESEARCH ON THE TEACHING OF GRAMMAR
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190504000066 · Cited by 269
Elgort, I., & Warren, P. (2014) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12052 · Cited by 240
VISUAL INPUT ENHANCEMENT AND GRAMMAR LEARNING: A Meta-Analytic Review
Lee, S.-K., & Huang, H.-T. (2008) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263108080479 · Cited by 238
Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges
Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L. (2010) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190510000115 · Cited by 237
“Consider, for example, the concept of “noticing” and the wide range of operationalizations and outcome measures that have been used to study its effects on L2 learning (e.g., R. Schmidt, 2001; Truscott, 1998).”
BackgroundEffects of Recasts and Elicitations in Dyadic Interaction and the Role of Feedback Explicitness
Nassaji, H. (2009) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00511.x · Cited by 249
Taking Technology to Task: Technology-Mediated TBLT, Performance, and Production
Ziegler, N. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190516000039 · Cited by 263
SYNCHRONOUS COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND INTERACTION
Ziegler, N. (2015) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226311500025x · Cited by 246
“Schmidt’s noticing hypothesis (Schmidt, 2001 ) also emphasizes the importance of noticing, and specifi cally the noticing of the formal features in the target language, as well as noticing gaps between a learner’s interlanguage and the target language.”
TASK COMPLEXITY, FOCUS ON FORM, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT
Révész, A. (2009) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109090366 · Cited by 220
“Noticing, in turn, may trigger destabilization and subsequent restructuring of the L2 grammar (Gass, 1997 ; Schmidt, 2001 ).”
BackgroundPulido, D. (2004) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00263.x · Cited by 208
Yılmaz, Y. (2012) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ams044 · Cited by 214
Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity
Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.01ell · Cited by 201
“In cases where linguistic form lacks perceptual salience and so goes unnoticed (Schmidt, 1990, 2001) by learners, or where the L2 semantic/pragmatic concepts to be mapped onto the L2 forms are unfamiliar, additional attention is necessary in order for the relevant associations to be learned.”
BackgroundLeeser, M. J. (2007) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00408.x · Cited by 206
Pulido, D. (2007) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/aml049 · Cited by 189
Vocabulary learning through viewing video: the effect of two enhancement techniques
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1375960 · Cited by 230
“These options aim at directing learners ’ attention to novel words to facilitate the noticing of those words (Schmidt, 2001) and the making of form-meaning connections, both of which are considered initial and essential steps in the acquisition of a novel lexical item (Hulstijn, 2001; Schmitt,…”
BackgroundUptake, Modified Output, and Learner Perceptions of Recasts: Learner Responses as Language Awareness
Egi, T. (2010) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00980.x · Cited by 193
The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners' acquisition of collocations
Szudarski, P., & Carter, R. (2014) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12092 · Cited by 202
Enhancing Vocabulary Learning Through Captioned Video: An Eye‐Tracking Study
MONTERO PEREZ, M., PETERS, E., & DESMET, P. (2015) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12215 · Cited by 188
Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.54.03wul · Cited by 84
Robinson, P. (2015) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.8.04rob · Cited by 192
Feedback‐Seeking Behavior in Language Learning: Basic Components and Motivational Antecedents
Papi, M., RIOS, A., PELT, H., & OZDEMIR, E. (2019) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12538 · Cited by 196
“In other words, this study confirmed that learners’ attention to CF (Schmidt, 1990, 2001) is not an exclusively cognitive mechanism for the intake and processing of CF (Gass, 1997); rather, it is an “internally motivated” (Ellis, 2005) method of engagement that is strategically employed by…”
Background“I Prefer Not Text”: Developing Japanese Learners’ Communicative Competence with Authentic Materials
Gilmore, A. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00634.x · Cited by 197
On the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Language Learning
Lee, S., Noh, H., Lee, J., Lee, K., Lee, G. G., Sagong, S., & Kim, M. (2011) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344010000273 · Cited by 180
“The recognition of problems may then prompt the learners to attend to the relevant information in the input, which Schmidt (2001) claims to be ‘‘the first step in language building.’’”
BackgroundTeacher written corrective feedback: Less is more
Lee, I. (2019) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444819000247 · Cited by 221
“First, they are more likely to attend to the teacher WCF, which is conducive to learning because learning tends to occur for things that students attend to rather than not attend to (Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundL2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development
Adams, R. (2003) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168803lr127oa · Cited by 179
Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development
Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P. (2004) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716404001134 · Cited by 168
“It is generally accepted in cognitive psychology, cognitive science, and in the second language acquisition (SLA) field that attention is a necessary condition for learning (e.g., Robinson, 1995a; Schmidt, 2001; Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977; Tomlin & Villa, 1994).”
BackgroundProcessing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study
Choi, S. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816653271 · Cited by 169
“The results are in agreement with the pervasive assumption that visually enhanced linguistic features attract more attention from learners (Lee, 2007; Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCorrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study
Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220600803311 · Cited by 158
“One of the main rationales behind error correction is that it can help learners notice the gap between their own interlanguage production and target language norms (Schmidt, 1995, 2001).”
BackgroundPromoting Task‐Based Pragmatics Instruction in EFL Classroom Contexts: The Role of Task Complexity
KIM, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2015) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12273 · Cited by 155
Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.09bar · Cited by 152
Toth, P. D. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00441.x · Cited by 149
The Multilingual Mind: A Modular Processing Perspective
Smith, M. S., & Truscott, J. (2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 149
Eckerth, J., & Tavakoli, P. (2012) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168811431377 · Cited by 149
“Given the far-reaching claims of the Involvement Load Hypothesis, its theoretical implications for SLA research, and its pedagogical relevance for teachers, task designers and material writers, we suggest that it is worthwhile pursuing these questions in future research.”
MethodShintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263110000288 · Cited by 159
The Effect of Frequency of Input‐Enhancements on Word Learning and Text Comprehension
Rott, S. (2007) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00406.x · Cited by 155
Differential Effects of Attention
Gass, S. M., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00233 · Cited by 148
Improving L2 Listeners’ Perception of English Vowels: A Computer‐Mediated Approach
Thomson, R. I. (2012) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00724.x · Cited by 145
Comparing Elicited Imitation and Word Monitoring as Measures of Implicit Knowledge
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12138 · Cited by 139
Yılmaz, Y. (2012) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00726.x · Cited by 154
SYNTACTIC PRIMING AND ESL QUESTION DEVELOPMENT
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2008) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263108080029 · Cited by 137
THE IMPLICIT LEARNING OF MAPPINGS BETWEEN FORMS AND CONTEXTUALLY DERIVED MEANINGS
Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2011) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263110000525 · Cited by 147
“Schmidt ( 2001 ) also noted that unconsciously perceived stimuli lead to automatic reactions, but consciously perceived stimuli allow participants to modify their reactions.”
LEARNING WITHOUT AWARENESS REVISITED
Hama, M., & Leow, R. P. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263110000045 · Cited by 135
“…fi eld, there has been no consensus on the role of awareness in L2 development in SLA, both at a theoretical level (e.g., Robinson, 1995 ; Schmidt, 1990 , 1993 , 1994 , 1995 , 2001 ; Tomlin & Villa, 1994 ) and at the level of empirical inquiry (e.g., Leow, 2000 ; Robinson; Rosa & Leow,…”
BackgroundAhmadian, M. J. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168811425433 · Cited by 141
“…and selective, to the effect that when there are two or more potential foci for attention, one cannot commit equal attentional resources to all of them; the task performer can attend to one of these focal points but this prioritization will come at the cost of others (Schmidt, 2001; Skehan, 1998).”
BackgroundAlobaid, A. (2020) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-020-00134-7 · Cited by 199
“The noticing hypothesis (Schmidt, 1990, 2001, as cited in Schmidt, 2010) argues that “ input does not become intake for language learning unless it is noticed, that is, consciously registered ” .”
BackgroundProcessing Instruction and a Role for Output in Second Language Acquisition
Toth, P. D. (2006) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00349.x · Cited by 136
Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics
Roever, C. (2006) · Language Testing · doi:10.1191/0265532206lt329oa · Cited by 133
“…to affect interlanguage systems: transfer, overgeneralization, simplification, transfer-of-training, amount and quality of input, attention and awareness, aptitude, motivation, and other individual differences (Selinker, 1972; Kasper, 1995; Kasper and Schmidt, 1996; Schmidt, 2001; Robinson, 2002).”
BackgroundHow do we Know what Students are Actually Doing? Monitoring Students' Behavior in CALL†
Fischer, R. A. (2007) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220701746013 · Cited by 140
“…conscious attention plays a fundamental role in language learning by causing learners to notice the gap between what they say (or what they want to say) and the input they receive from native speakers or more proficient L2 speakers (Doughty, 2003; Pica, 2005; Swain, 1995, 1998, 2005; Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundTASK COMPLEXITY, LANGUAGE-RELATED EPISODES, AND PRODUCTION OF L2 SPANISH VOWELS
Solon, M., Long, A., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000425 · Cited by 41
“Much like the larger field of L2 research (e.g., Schmidt, 1990, 2001), taskbased researchers hold that learners must be encouraged to attend to form within meaning-based task interaction (Ellis, 2003; Long, 1985, 1998, 2015; Long & Norris, 2000; Robinson, 2001b, 2011; Skehan, 1998).”
BackgroundShintani, N. (2015) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.166 · Cited by 129
Winke, P. M. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000903 · Cited by 121
“This is an important claim because paying attention to forms in the input is assumed to be a necessary precondition for learning them (Leow, 1999 ; Robinson, 1995 , 2003 ; Schmidt, 1990 , 2001 ; Sharwood Smith, 1991 ; Tomlin & Villa, 1994 ).”
BackgroundThe development of comprehensible speech in L2 learners
Gordon, J. A., & Darcy, I. (2016) · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation · doi:10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor · Cited by 121
Phakiti, A. (2008) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532207086783 · Cited by 125
“There is consensus that strategic processing has a component of awareness and occurs within the working memory realm (stipulated within the focal attention or at least within peripheral attention; Cohen, 2007; Schmidt, 2001).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, R.
- Corresponding author
- Schmidt, Richard
- ORCID
- Schmidt, Richard
- Venue
- Cognition and Second Language Instruction
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-11-29
- Pages
- 3-32
- OpenAlex
- W1573000476
- Cited by
- 1,322
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 34.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- attention, second language acquisition, interlanguage development, selective attention, limited capacity, alertness, orientation, facilitation, inhibition, individual differences in language learning, motivation, aptitude, learning strategies, interaction in language learning, negotiation of meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review