Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design

Sawyer, Mark, Ranta, Leila·2001·Cognition and Second Language Instruction

Abstract

Introduction: a paradox in SLA research Individuals who attempt to learn a foreign language differ dramatically in their rates of acquisition and in their ultimate attainment. This is perhaps the clearest fact about SLA that we currently have, and of course it is particularly striking in relation to the relative uniformity of learning rate and ultimate success in L1 acquisition. Bley-Vroman (1989), among other scholars, has argued that these differences demonstrate that the underlying L1 and L2 acquisition processes must be fundamentally different. Whether or not L1 and L2 acquisition develop in completely different ways, it is important for both theoretical and practical reasons to attempt to specify and understand the sources that contribute to differences among second language (L2) learners. The paradox is that despite this importance, L2 research into the sources of individual differences (IDs) has lagged far behind research seeking universal principles. With the exception of the social psychologically oriented work on motivation and other affective variables pursued by Robert Gardner (see Gardner & MacIntyre, 1992, 1993, for an overview), no major research program focusing on IDs and integrating them within a model of SLA has yet been developed. This is partly due to limitations inherent in the correlational research designs favored by earlier studies, and the difficulty of finding reliable and valid measures of both the learner traits and the L2 learning outcomes (Larse…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139524780.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • L2 instruction may also be able to compensate for learners' weaknesses by providing dedicated support in the form of scaffolding and extra practice.

    “However, it may also be able to compensate for learners' weaknesses by providing dedicated support in the form of scaffolding and extra practice (Ranta, 2008;Sawyer & Ranta, 2001;Skehan, 1998;Vatz et al., 2013).”

    From The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction (2024) · cites this paper as Sawyer & Ranta, 2001

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L.
Venue
Cognition and Second Language Instruction
Published
2001-11-29
Pages
319-353
Cited by
90
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review