Cited by 65Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Why is working memory performance unstable? A review of 21 factors

Open access
Blasiman, Rachael N., Was, Christopher A.·2018·Europe’s Journal of Psychology

Abstract

In this paper, we systematically reviewed twenty-one factors that have been shown to either vary with or influence performance on working memory (WM) tasks. Specifically, we review previous work on the influence of intelligence, gender, age, personality, mental illnesses/medical conditions, dieting, craving, stress/anxiety, emotion/motivation, stereotype threat, temperature, mindfulness training, practice, bilingualism, musical training, altitude/hypoxia, sleep, exercise, diet, psychoactive substances, and brain stimulation on WM performance. In addition to a review of the literature, we suggest several frameworks for classifying these factors, identify shared mechanisms between several variables, and suggest areas requiring further investigation. This review critically examines the breadth of research investigating WM while synthesizing the results across related subfields in psychology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1472

Cites

269 of 274 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
  2. Logie R. H. (1999). Working memory. The Psychologist, 12(4), 174– 178.
  3. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning (pp. 339-364). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blasiman, R. N., & Was, C. A.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Blasiman, Rachael N.
Venue
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Published
2018-03-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
188-231
ISSN
1841-0413 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790489362
Cited by
65
References
269
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Europe’s Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Psychology Archives (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory, performance variability, intelligence, gender differences, age effects, personality, mental illness, dieting, craving, stress and anxiety, emotion and motivation, stereotype threat, temperature, mindfulness training, bilingualism, musical training, hypoxia, sleep, physical activity, psychoactive substances, brain stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review