The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Civil Society under Authoritarianism: The China Model
Open accessAbstract
Despite the dominant narrative of the repression of civil society in China, Civil Society under Authoritarianism: The China Model argues that interactions between local officials and civil society facilitate a learning process, whereby each actor learns about the intentions and work processes of the other. Over the past two decades, often facilitated by foreign donors and problems within the general social framework, these interactions generated a process in which officials learned the benefits and disadvantages of civil society. Civil society supports local officials' efforts to provide social services and improve public policies, yet it also engages in protest and other activities that challenge social stability and development. This duality motivates local officials in China to construct a 'social management' system - known as consultative authoritarianism - to encourage the beneficial aspects and discourage the dangerous ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain
Hall, P. A. (1993) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422246 · Cited by 7,369
Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x · Cited by 2,117
The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507 · Cited by 1,379
Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization
Brownlee, J. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802348 · Cited by 1,070
What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?
Bennett, C. J. (1991) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400006116 · Cited by 992
Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy?
Bank, W., & Knack, S. (2003) · Cited by 591
China´ s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation
Lam, W. (2008) · Contemporary Southeast Asia · doi:10.1355/cs30-2n · Cited by 488
When knowledge is power: three models of change in international organizations
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0564 · Cited by 406
The Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, 1990–2003
Finkel, S. E., Pérez-Liñán, A., & Seligson, M. A. (2007) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887100020876 · Cited by 386
Non‐Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes
Stone, D. (2000) · Governance · doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00123 · Cited by 281
Cited by
Hassan, M., Mattingly, D., & Nugent, E. R. (2022) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013321 · Cited by 113
Dai, J., & Spires, A. J. (2018) · The China Journal · doi:10.1086/693440 · Cited by 95
What type of nonprofit organization is preferred in government contracting in China?
Dong, Q., & Lu, J. (2021) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852319862347 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Teets, J. C.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2014-06-05
- OpenAlex
- W4249983810
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 25.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Civil Society under Authoritarianism: The China Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139839396
- The paper
- Teets, J. C. (2014). Civil Society under Authoritarianism: The China Model. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139839396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.