The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Abstract
The governance of natural resources used by many individuals in common is an issue of increasing concern to policy analysts. Both state control and privatization of resources have been advocated, but neither the state nor the market have been uniformly successful in solving common pool resource problems. After critiquing the foundations of policy analysis as applied to natural resources, Elinor Ostrom here provides a unique body of empirical data to explore conditions under which common pool resource problems have been satisfactorily or unsatisfactorily solved. Dr Ostrom uses institutional analysis to explore different ways - both successful and unsuccessful - of governing the commons. In contrast to the proposition of the 'tragedy of the commons' argument, common pool problems sometimes are solved by voluntary organizations rather than by a coercive state. Among the cases considered are communal tenure in meadows and forests, irrigation communities and other water rights, and fisheries.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These innovations exemplify what Ostrom (2015) terms “governance design principles”/; institutional arrangements that enable sustainable citizen engagement beyond individual leadership.”
From Transcending Boundaries: Sushma Swaraj and the Multidimensional Paradigm of Women's Empowerment in Political Leadership (2025) · cites this paper as Ostrom (2015)
In the citing paper
“This is the approach adopted in conservation biology, where crises observed across multiple contexts (e.g., ecosystem collapse, mismanaged commons) lead to an understanding of multiscaled dynamics yielding solutions that can be tailored to given sociological and ecological contexts (8, 47, 64).”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 950
Sevilla, S., Johnson, M. W., Kosakanchit, P., Liang, J. T., & Heimerl, K. (2019) · ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom) · doi:10.1145/3300061.3345446 · Cited by 31
Fischli, R., & Muldoon, J. (2024) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592724000409 · Cited by 49
Bakaki, Z., & Bernauer, T. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114001 · Cited by 32
The Organization of Ancient Economies
Hirth, K. G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108859707 · Cited by 44
Energy Communities and the Tensions Between Neoliberalism and Communitarianism
Laes, E., & Bombaerts, G. J. T. (2022) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00359-w · Cited by 29
Therville, C., Mathevet, R., & Bioret, F. (2012) · VertigO · doi:10.4000/vertigo.13046 · Cited by 29
Delea, M. G., Sclar, G. D., Woreta, M., Haardörfer, R., Nagel, C., Caruso, B. A., Dreibelbis, R., Gobezayehu, A. G., Clasen, T., & Freeman, M. C. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15102139 · Cited by 32
Contested Knowledges in Hydroelectric Project Assessment: The Case of Canada’s Site C Project
Bakker, K., & Hendriks, R. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w11030406 · Cited by 29
Science Embedded in Local Forest Landscape Management Improves Benefit Flows to Society
Langston, J. D., Riggs, R. A., Kastanya, A., Sayer, J. A., Margules, C. R., & Boedhihartono, A. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2019.00003 · Cited by 28
“A rich history of analysis of local governance and resource stewardship has informed decisions and policies to acknowledge and legitimize localized resource management regimes (Nagendra and Ostrom, 2012; Ostrom, 2015).”
BackgroundWang, J., Wang, Y., He, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14095215 · Cited by 29
The Promotion and Development of One Health at Swiss TPH and Its Greater Potential
Zinsstag, J., Hediger, K., Osman, Y. M., et al. (2022) · Diseases · doi:10.3390/diseases10030065 · Cited by 28
Valuing knowledge: The political economy of human capital accounting
Yarrow, D. (2020) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1796751 · Cited by 27
Knowledge for just urban sustainability
May, T., & Perry, B. (2016) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2016.1233527 · Cited by 29
A Sustainability Lighthouse—Supporting Transition Leadership and Conversations on Desirable Futures
Holmberg, J., & Larsson, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10113842 · Cited by 41
Urban youth and the environmental commons: rejuvenating civic engagement through civic science
Flanagan, C. A., Gallay, E. E., & Pykett, A. A. (2021) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2021.1994132 · Cited by 27
‘A commons before the sea:’ climate justice considerations for coastal zone management
Jurjonas, M., & Seekamp, E. (2019) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2019.1611533 · Cited by 26
Transforming construction: heterarchical megaproject ecologies and the management of innovation
Brunet, M., & Cohendet, P. S. (2021) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2021.1983851 · Cited by 29
“Proposition 1: Heterarchical megaproject ecologies need to establish clear governance rules (“how to manage the common-Pool resources”) Building on Ostrom (2015) design principles for common-pool resources, Hall and Bonanomi (2021) propose a theorization for how to govern collaborative project…”
BackgroundComputing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence
Sastry, G., Heim, L., Belfield, H., Anderljung, M., Brundage, M., Hazell, J., O'Keefe, C., Hadfield, G. K., Ngo, R., Pilz, K., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.08797 · Cited by 26
Addressing Negative Externalities of Urban Development: Toward a More Sustainable Approach
Correia, C. R., & Roseland, M. (2022) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci6020038 · Cited by 28
Project-Based Governance Framework for an Agri-Food Cooperative
Herrera-Reyes, A.-T., Carmenado, I. D. L. R., & Almela, J. M. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061881 · Cited by 26
The social drivers of cooperation in groundwater management and implications for sustainability
Asprilla-Echeverria, J. (2021) · Groundwater for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100668 · Cited by 21
“Consumers connected to the grid perceive the water supply as a shared commodity (Basmajian, 2014), while consumers relying on groundwater, manage the water as a common-pool resource (Meinzen-Dick et al., 2016; Ostrom, 2015; E. Ostrom, 2008b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUrban green commons for socially sustainable cities and communities
Barthel, S., Colding, J., Hiswåls, A.-S., et al. (2021) · Nordic Social Work Research · doi:10.1080/2156857x.2021.1947876 · Cited by 24
Coppock, D. L., Crowley, L., Durham, S. L., Groves, D. W., Jamison, J., Karlan, D., Norton, B. E., & Ramsey, R. D. (2022) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00361-5 · Cited by 25
Meyer, M. (2017) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12138 · Cited by 28
Assessing smart city projects and their implications for public policy in the Global South
Anand, P. B. (2020) · Contemporary Social Science · doi:10.1080/21582041.2020.1720794 · Cited by 23
Developing the Assessment and Indicators for Local Institutions in Dealing with Forest Fire Dilemmas
Purnomo, E. P., Agustiyara, A., Ramdani, R., Trisnawati, D. W., Anand, P. B., & Fathani, A. T. (2021) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f12060704 · Cited by 24
Hardin’s imagined tragedy is pig shit: A call for planning to recenter the commons
Brinkley, C. K. (2019) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/1473095218820460 · Cited by 23
Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Who, how, and why?
Jarvis, D. S. L., & He, A. J. (2020) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.1876 · Cited by 25
Mansfield, E. J., Micheli, F., Fujita, R. M., Fulton, E. A., Gelcich, S., Battista, W., Bustamante, R. H., Cao, L., Daniels, B. N., Finkbeiner, E. M., et al. (2024) · npj Ocean Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s44183-023-00035-5 · Cited by 28
Introduction. Les ressources, enjeux géographiques d’un objet pluriel
Magrin, G., Chauvin, E., Bruslé, L. P., Lavie, É., & Redon, M. (2015) · Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.psorbonne.100920 · Cited by 23
Assessing climate policies: Catastrophe avoidance and the right to sustainable development
Callies, D. E., & Moellendorf, D. (2021) · Politics Philosophy & Economics · doi:10.1177/1470594x211003334 · Cited by 22
Toward a Sustainable Circular Economy Powered by Community-Based Incentive Systems
Dapp, M. M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99058-3_6 · Cited by 24
Sweatshop Regulation and Workers’ Choices
Flanigan, J. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3395-0 · Cited by 24
Sullivan, L. (2018) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12326 · Cited by 23
Social–ecological timelines to explore human adaptation to coastal change
Brattland, C., Eythórsson, E., Weines, J., & Sunnanå, K. (2018) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-018-1129-5 · Cited by 17
Brinkley, C. K., Glennie, C., Chrisinger, B. W., et al. (2019) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.1863 · Cited by 22
Olugbade, O. E. (2025) · Global Public Policy and Governance · doi:10.1007/s43508-025-00113-z · Cited by 25
Steps towards an Ecology for the Internet
Madhavapeddy, A., Reynolds, S., Christie, A. P., Coomes, D. A., Dales, M., Ferris, P., Gibb, R. T., Haddadi, H., Jaffer, S., Millar, J., et al. (2025) · Decennial Aarhus Conference · doi:10.1145/3744169.3744180 · Cited by 21
« Commun » et « communauté » : un essai de clarification sociologique
Laval, C. (2021) · SociologieS · doi:10.4000/sociologies.5677 · Cited by 21
Alam, R., & Lovett, J. C. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11123387 · Cited by 22
Coalition-structured governance improves cooperation to provide public goods
de Vasconcelos, V. V. L., Hannam, P. M., Levin, S. A., & Pacheco, J. M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65960-8 · Cited by 29
Welfare and Conflict: Policy Failure in the Indonesian Cash Transfer
Sumarto, M. (2020) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279420000252 · Cited by 22
The sustainable state: a meta-governance framework
Bornemann, B., Christen, M., & Burger, P. (2024) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2024.2369015 · Cited by 20
The impact of self-help groups on pastoral women’s empowerment and agency: A study in Nigeria
Badejo, A. F., Majekodunmi, A. O., Kingsley, P., et al. (2017) · Pastoralism Research Policy and Practice · doi:10.1186/s13570-017-0101-5 · Cited by 20
Borowski-Maaser, I., Graversgaard, M., Foster, N. M., Prutzer, M., Roest, A. H., & Boogaard, F. C. (2021) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13091206 · Cited by 21
Deliberation and Resolution on Wikipedia
Im, J., Zhang, A. X., Schilling, C. J., & Karger, D. R. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274343 · Cited by 20
Understanding service ecosystem dynamics: a typology
Asad, N., Patrício, L., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Edvardsson, B. (2024) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-07-2023-0322 · Cited by 21
Marginson, S. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01341-8 · Cited by 31
The Magnitude and Cost of Groundwater Metering and Control in Agriculture
Ursitti, A., Giannoccaro, G., Prosperi, M., et al. (2018) · Water · doi:10.3390/w10030344 · Cited by 19
“Starting Points Matter”: Humanizing Economics Pedagogy through New Economic Paradigms
Shanks, N. (2020) · The Social Studies · doi:10.1080/00377996.2020.1757600 · Cited by 19
The problem of insignificant hands
Hindriks, F. (2021) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01696-z · Cited by 19
“What is distinctive about Joyguzzlers is that it is an instance of the tragedy of the commons (Hardins, 1968; Ostrom, 2015).”
One Health in human-environment systems: Linking health and the sustainable use of natural resources
Zinsstag, J., Meyer, J., Bonfoh, B., Fink, G., & Dimov, A. (2024) · CABI One Health · doi:10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0012 · Cited by 20
Community Branding (Co-Bra): A Collaborative Decision Making Process for Urban Regeneration
Cerreta, M., & Daldanise, G. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_52 · Cited by 19
Epistemic Communities in Urban Self-organization
de Bruijn, E., & Gerrits, L. (2018) · Journal of Planning Literature · doi:10.1177/0885412218794083 · Cited by 19
Sun, Y., Zhu, L., Zhang, N., Wu, H., Chen, Q., & Wang, H. (2024) · Land · doi:10.3390/land13122144 · Cited by 23
Ahmed, H., Call, D. R., Quinlan, R. J., & Yoder, J. (2017) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x17000341 · Cited by 22
Interlacing Planning and Degrowth Scholarship
Ferreira, A., & von Schönfeld, K. C. (2020) · disP - The Planning Review · doi:10.1080/02513625.2020.1756633 · Cited by 18
Ordeñana, E. A., Beaskoetxea, I. Z., & Calvo-Sotomayor, I. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13195045 · Cited by 17
Blockchain and regenerative finance: charting a path toward regeneration
Schletz, M., Constant, A., Hsu, A., Schillebeeckx, S. J. D., Beck, R., & Wainstein, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2023.1165133 · Cited by 26
Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition
Schellens, M. K., & Gísladóttir, J. (2018) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources7040079 · Cited by 17
What is a Medical Information Commons?
Bollinger, J. M., Zuk, P. D., Majumder, M. A., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1177/1073110519840483 · Cited by 17
Sharing the Benefits of Asteroid Mining
Butkevičienė, E., & Rabitz, F. (2022) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13035 · Cited by 17
Evolutionary Game Dynamics for Two Interacting Populations in A Co-evolving Environment
Gong, L., Gao, J., & Cao, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc.2018.8619801 · Cited by 17
Civic Agency in Governance: The Role of Legitimacy with Citizens vs. Donors
Puljek-Shank, R. (2018) · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-018-0020-0 · Cited by 22
Today Me, Tomorrow Thee: Efficient Resource Allocation in Competitive Settings using Karma Games
Censi, A., Bolognani, S., Zilly, J., et al. (2019) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2019.8916911 · Cited by 17
Resilient Drinking Water Resources
Kloosterman, R. A., van der Hoek, J. P., & Herder, P. (2020) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-020-02736-9 · Cited by 16
Natural Disasters Management and the Challenge of Governability in Indonesia
Efendi, D., Agustiyara, A., & Putra, H. A. (2019) · Indian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0019556119840953 · Cited by 16
Li, Y., Sewell, D. K., Saber, S., Shank, D. B., & Kashima, Y. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-02989-2 · Cited by 18
Morell, M. F., Espelt, R., & Cano, M. R. (2021) · CIRIEC-España revista de economía pública social y cooperativa · doi:10.7203/ciriec-e.102.18429 · Cited by 16
Shelby, H. (2021) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/14730952211037372 · Cited by 16
Awung, N. S., & Marchant, R. (2017) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2017.1363144 · Cited by 16
Sarkki, S., Heikkinen, H. I., & Löf, A. (2020) · Springer polar sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52324-4_13 · Cited by 16
Mountifield, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2025.1529906 · Cited by 15
Albizua, A., & Zaga‐Mendez, A. (2020) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1882 · Cited by 15
Moore, T., & González-Álvarez, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009042826.007 · Cited by 15
Governing with public engagement: an anticipatory approach to human genome editing
Barlevy, D., Juengst, E. T., Kahn, J. P., Moreno, J. D., Lambert, L. M., Charo, A., Chneiweiss, H., Farooque, M., Guston, D. H., Hyun, I., et al. (2024) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scae010 · Cited by 17
Wolsink, M. (2024) · Land · doi:10.3390/land13081236 · Cited by 15
Governance in Rural Contexts: Toward the Formulation of a Conceptual Framework
Douglas, D. J. A. (2018) · EchoGéo · doi:10.4000/echogeo.15265 · Cited by 15
A psychological approach to promoting truth in politics: The pro-truth pledge
Tsipursky, G., Votta, F., & Mulick, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v6i2.856 · Cited by 18
Enhancing and Accelerating Social Science Via Automation: Challenges and Opportunities
Yarkoni, T., Eckles, D., Heathers, J. A. J., Levenstein, M. C., Smaldino, P. E., & Lane, J. I. (2021) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.df2262f5 · Cited by 22
System change evaluation: Insights from The Rippel Foundation and its ReThink Health initiative
Gates, E., & Fils‐Aime, F. (2021) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.20462 · Cited by 15
Ranchers' Perspectives on Participating in Non-lethal Wolf-Livestock Coexistence Strategies
Bogezi, C., van Eeden, L. M., Wirsing, A. J., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Conservation Science · doi:10.3389/fcosc.2021.683732 · Cited by 15
Murali, R., Bijoor, A., Thinley, T., et al. (2022) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2022.2067241 · Cited by 15
The Promise of Blockchain for the Construction Industry: A Governance Lens
Hunhevicz, J., Dounas, T., & Hall, D. (2022) · Blockchain technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3759-0_2 · Cited by 20
Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Socio-ecological Systems: The Role of Social Capital
Brondízio, E. S., Elinor Ostrom, B., & Young, O. R. (2012) · Presses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.septentrion.9192 · Cited by 18
Résilience et développement : complément, substitut ou palliatif ?
Ancey, V., Pesche, D., & Daviron, B. (2017) · Revue internationale des études du développement · doi:10.3917/ried.231.0057 · Cited by 14
Kang, K. E. (2021) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/1078087421991240 · Cited by 14
Dossou, J., Belle, S. V., & Marchal, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.553980 · Cited by 15
Communs et capitalisme numérique : histoire d’un antagonisme et de quelques affinités électives
Broca, S. (2021) · Terminal · doi:10.4000/terminal.7595 · Cited by 14
Global environmental politics and international organizations: the Eurasian and European experience
Obydenkova, A. (2022) · Post-Communist Economies · doi:10.1080/14631377.2022.2028477 · Cited by 14
Co-design, neighbourhood sharing, and commoning through urban living labs
Belfield, A., & Petrescu, D. (2024) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2024.2381792 · Cited by 14
Les espaces marins du Pacifique entre logiques de commun et d’accaparement
Meur, P.-Y. L., Bambridge, T., Degrémont, M., & Rodary, E. (2018) · Revue internationale des études du développement · doi:10.3917/ried.234.0009 · Cited by 16
Guimarães, E., Sá, A. A., Gabriel, R., Moreira, H., Guimarães, J. R. S., Bandeira, P. F. R., Silva, J. M. F. D. L., Soares, R. C., & Melo, J. (2018) · Geosciences · doi:10.3390/geosciences8060199 · Cited by 15
Vehicle automation and freeway ‘pipeline’ capacity in the context of legal standards of care
Vine, S. L., Kong, Y., Liu, X., & Polak, J. W. (2017) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-017-9825-8 · Cited by 15
State-Customary Interactions and Agrarian Change in Ghana. The Case of Nkoranza Traditional Area
Kugbega, S. K. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9110458 · Cited by 14
Gibson, L., Busch, K. C., Stevenson, K. T., Cutts, B. B., DeMattia, E. A., Aguilar, O. M., Ardoin, N. M., Carrier, S., Clark, C. R., Cooper, C. B., et al. (2022) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2022.2067325 · Cited by 17
Jones, T. R. (2023) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc13020038 · Cited by 21
Palumbo, R. (2017) · International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing · doi:10.1007/s12208-017-0175-1 · Cited by 14
Chiaravalloti, R. M., Bolzan, F., Roque, F. D. O., & Biswas, S. (2022) · Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management · doi:10.14321/aehm.025.01.72 · Cited by 13
Ball, J., Hauck, J., Holland, R. A., et al. (2022) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.10390 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostrom, E.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2015-09-23
- OpenAlex
- W4253773297
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 127 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 52.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- commons governance, common-pool resources, tragedy of the commons, institutional analysis, state control of natural resources, privatization, voluntary organizations, meadows, forests, irrigation communities, water rights, fisheries, natural resource policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review