The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Abstract
The governance of natural resources used by many individuals in common is an issue of increasing concern to policy analysts. Both state control and privatization of resources have been advocated, but neither the state nor the market have been uniformly successful in solving common pool resource problems. After critiquing the foundations of policy analysis as applied to natural resources, Elinor Ostrom here provides a unique body of empirical data to explore conditions under which common pool resource problems have been satisfactorily or unsatisfactorily solved. Dr Ostrom uses institutional analysis to explore different ways - both successful and unsuccessful - of governing the commons. In contrast to the proposition of the 'tragedy of the commons' argument, common pool problems sometimes are solved by voluntary organizations rather than by a coercive state. Among the cases considered are communal tenure in meadows and forests, irrigation communities and other water rights, and fisheries.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These innovations exemplify what Ostrom (2015) terms “governance design principles”/; institutional arrangements that enable sustainable citizen engagement beyond individual leadership.”
From Transcending Boundaries: Sushma Swaraj and the Multidimensional Paradigm of Women's Empowerment in Political Leadership (2025) · cites this paper as Ostrom (2015)
In the citing paper
“This is the approach adopted in conservation biology, where crises observed across multiple contexts (e.g., ecosystem collapse, mismanaged commons) lead to an understanding of multiscaled dynamics yielding solutions that can be tailored to given sociological and ecological contexts (8, 47, 64).”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global agricultural economic water scarcity
Rosa, L., Chiarelli, D. D., Rulli, M. C., Dell’Angelo, J., & D’Odorico, P. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz6031 · Cited by 832
Ecosystem management as a wicked problem
DeFries, R., & Nagendra, H. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal1950 · Cited by 578
The Influence of Formal and Informal Institutional Voids on Entrepreneurship
Webb, J. W., Khoury, T. A., & Hitt, M. A. (2020) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719830310 · Cited by 411
Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action
Andre, P., Boneva, T., Chopra, F., & Falk, A. (2024) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-024-01925-3 · Cited by 422
Stewardship of global collective behavior
Bak-Coleman, J. B., Alfano, M., Barfuss, W., Bergstrom, C. T., Centeno, M. A., Couzin, I. D., Donges, J. F., Galesic, M., Gersick, A. S., Jacquet, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2025764118 · Cited by 289
Chandrasekharan, E., Samory, M., Jhaver, S., Charvat, H., Bruckman, A., Lampe, C., Eisenstein, J., & Gilbert, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274301 · Cited by 282
Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward
Boyer, R. H. W., Peterson, N. D., Arora, P., & Caldwell, K. B. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8090878 · Cited by 324
E Pluribus Unum: Impact Entrepreneurship as a Solution to Grand Challenges
Markman, G. D., Waldron, T. L., Gianiodis, P. T., et al. (2019) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2019.0130 · Cited by 182
Climate change impacts and adaptive strategies: lessons from the grapevine
Mosedale, J. R., Abernethy, K., Smart, R., Wilson, R. J., & Maclean, I. M. D. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13406 · Cited by 170
Towards a conceptual understanding of sustainability‐driven entrepreneurship
Haldar, S. (2019) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1763 · Cited by 165
Chandrasekharan, E., Samory, M., Srinivasan, A., & Gilbert, É. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3026018 · Cited by 153
Firchow, P. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108236140 · Cited by 155
A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-scale Citizen Engagement around Urban Issues
Balestrini, M., Rogers, Y., Hassan, C., Creus, J., King, M., & Marshall, P. (2017) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025915 · Cited by 170
Biswas, A., Sarkar, S., Das, S., et al. (2025) · Cambridge Prisms Water · doi:10.1017/wat.2024.16 · Cited by 146
A Survey on Data Pricing: From Economics to Data Science
Pei, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.3045927 · Cited by 189
Punishment: one tool, many uses
Raihani, N., & Bshary, R. (2019) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2019.12 · Cited by 139
The Uncommons: An Introduction
Blaser, M., & de la Cadena, M. (2017) · Anthropologica · doi:10.3138/anth.59.2.t01 · Cited by 134
Trischler, J., & Charles, M. B. (2018) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/0743915618818566 · Cited by 149
The Incremental Demise of Urban Green Spaces
Colding, J., Gren, Å., & Barthel, S. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9050162 · Cited by 126
Thinking Outside the Black-Box: The Case for “Algorithmic Sovereignty” in Social Media
Reviglio, U., & Agosti, C. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120915613 · Cited by 172
Understanding Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agroforestry on Rural Communities
Mukhlis, I., Rizaludin, M. S., & Hidayah, I. (2022) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f13040556 · Cited by 118
Interactions and management for the future of marine aquaculture and capture fisheries
Clavelle, T., Lester, S. E., Gentry, R. R., & Froehlich, H. E. (2019) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12351 · Cited by 123
Mazzucato, M. (2023) · Journal of Economic Policy Reform · doi:10.1080/17487870.2023.2280969 · Cited by 132
Ethical ‘mess’ in co-produced research: reflections from a U.K.-based case study
Thomas-Hughes, H. (2017) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2017.1364065 · Cited by 112
The competition fetish in higher education: Shamans, mind snares and consequences
Naidoo, R. (2018) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1177/1474904118784839 · Cited by 98
Emerson, K. (2018) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000381 · Cited by 87
Blake, W. H., Rabinovich, A., Wynants, M., Kelly, C., Nasseri, M., Ngondya, I. B., Patrick, A., Mtei, K., Munishi, L. K., Boeckx, P., et al. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaea8b · Cited by 98
Towards inclusive peace: Analysing gender-sensitive peace agreements 2000–2016
True, J., & Morales, Y. R. (2018) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512118808608 · Cited by 101
Follow that fish: Uncovering the hidden blue economy in coral reef fisheries
Grafeld, S., Oleson, K. L. L., Teneva, L. T., & Kittinger, J. N. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182104 · Cited by 93
Institutional constraints: the forms and limits of participatory design in the public realm
Lodato, T., & DiSalvo, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 · doi:10.1145/3210586.3210595 · Cited by 86
An Effectual Model of Collective Action for Addressing Sustainability Challenges
Sarasvathy, S. D., & Ramesh, A. (2018) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0090 · Cited by 88
Undermining subsistence: Barren-ground caribou in a “tragedy of open access”
Parlee, B. L., Sandlos, J., & Natcher, D. C. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701611 · Cited by 81
de Molina, M. G., & García, D. L. (2021) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2021.1913690 · Cited by 103
Trischler, J., Røhnebæk, M., Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2229836 · Cited by 106
The Role of Peer Effects in Natural Resource Appropriation – The Case of Groundwater
Sampson, G. S., & Perry, E. (2018) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aay090 · Cited by 78
Rethinking the economics of water: an assessment
Garrick, D. E., Hanemann, W. M., & Hepburn, C. J. (2019) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grz035 · Cited by 80
Dynamics of Social Enterprises—Shift from Social Innovation to Open Innovation
Yun, J. J., Park, K., Im, C., et al. (2017) · Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1177/0971721817723375 · Cited by 77
Tsai, L. L., Morse, B. S., & Blair, R. A. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414019897698 · Cited by 74
Inside co‐production: Ruling, resistance, and practice
Bevir, M., Needham, C. E., & Waring, J. J. (2019) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12483 · Cited by 71
The global south is rich in sustainability lessons that students deserve to hear
Nagendra, H. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05210-0 · Cited by 72
Platform capitalism: a socio-economic analysis
Boyer, R. (2020) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwaa055 · Cited by 71
Ramírez, M., Bernal-Hernández, P., Clarke, I., & Hernández, I. D. (2018) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.005 · Cited by 68
Fighting Fake News and Post-Truth Politics with Behavioral Science: The Pro-Truth Pledge
Tsipursky, G., Votta, F., & Roose, K. M. (2017) · Behavior and Social Issues · doi:10.5210/bsi.v27i0.9127 · Cited by 74
Decreasing farm number benefits the mitigation of agricultural non-point source pollution in China
Fan, L., Yuan, Y., Ying, Z., Lam, S.-K., Liu, L., Zhang, X., Liu, H.-B., & Gu, B.-J. (2018) · Environmental science and pollution research international · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3622-6 · Cited by 65
Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) in Mexico: a theoretic ideal or everyday practice?
Kaufmann, S., & Vogl, C. (2018) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-017-9844-2 · Cited by 60
Does Institutional Quality Matter for Multidimensional Well-Being Inequalities? Insights from Italy
Ferrara, A. R., & Nisticò, R. (2019) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-019-02123-x · Cited by 60
“The focus on rules is shared by Hodgson’s view (2007, p. 331) of institutions as ‘enduring systems of socially ingrained rules’ and, beyond a strictly economic definition, by Ostrom (Ahn and Ostrom 2009; Ostrom 2015).”
BackgroundBibliometric Review of Research on Knowledge Management and Sustainability, 1994–2018
Sanguankaew, P., & Ractham, V. V. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11164388 · Cited by 71
People prefer coordinated punishment in cooperative interactions
Molleman, L., Kölle, F., Starmer, C., & Gächter, S. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0707-2 · Cited by 58
The cultural evolution and ecology of institutions
Currie, T. E., Campennì, M., Flitton, A., Njagi, T., Ontiri, E. M., Perret, C., & Walker, L. A. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0047 · Cited by 61
Marine spatial planning and the risk of ocean grabbing in the tropical Atlantic
Quéffelec, B., Bonnin, M., Ferreira, B. P., Bertrand, S., da Silva, S. T., Diouf, F. S., Trouillet, B., Cudennec, A., Brunel, A., Billant, O., et al. (2021) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsab006 · Cited by 57
Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections with the Sustainable Development Goals
Morell, M. F., Espelt, R., & Cano, M. R. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12187640 · Cited by 53
Piatak, J., Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Johnston, J. M. (2017) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1400993 · Cited by 54
Han, J., Shi, L., Yang, Q. L., Huang, K. J., Zha, Y., & Yu, J. (2020) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-020-09734-2 · Cited by 54
Global land use implications of dietary trends
Rizvi, S., Pagnutti, C., Fraser, E., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200781 · Cited by 52
Concentrated lunar resources: imminent implications for governance and justice
Elvis, M., Krolikowski, A., & Milligan, T. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0563 · Cited by 52
Chen, S., Bruyne, C. D., & Bollempalli, M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114654 · Cited by 74
Aliabadi, V., Ataei, P., & Gholamrezai, S. (2022) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100245 · Cited by 52
Rotz, S., Fraser, E., & Martin, R. C. (2017) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1351953 · Cited by 56
Tipping pro-environmental norm diffusion at scale: opportunities and limitations
Berger, J. L., Efferson, C. M., & Vogt, S. (2021) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.36 · Cited by 46
Norm emergence in multiagent systems: a viewpoint paper
Morris-Martin, A., Vos, M. D., & Padget, J. A. (2019) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-019-09422-0 · Cited by 60
Govern land as a global commons
Creutzig, F. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/546028a · Cited by 45
Lemeilleur, S., & Allaire, G. (2018) · Économie rurale · doi:10.4000/economierurale.5813 · Cited by 44
Acharya, A. R., Harding, R., & Harris, J. A. (2020) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951629820941110 · Cited by 41
Discourse and Power Relations in Community Tourism
Xue, L., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2017) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287517714908 · Cited by 42
Norris, D., Michalski, F., & Gibbs, J. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4856 · Cited by 42
Crumpton, C. D., Wongthanavasu, S., Kamnuansilpa, P., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development · doi:10.1080/19463138.2020.1827411 · Cited by 40
Barfuß, W., Donges, J. F., Wiedermann, M., & Lucht, W. (2017) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-8-255-2017 · Cited by 39
Privacy as Commons: Case Evaluation Through the Governing Knowledge Commons Framework
Sanfilippo, M. R., Frischmann, B. M., & Standburg, K. (2018) · Journal of Information Policy · doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.8.2018.0116 · Cited by 41
Values and groundwater management in the Ogallala Aquifer region
Lauer, S., Sanderson, M. R., Manning, D. T., Suter, J. F., Hrozencik, R. A., Guerrero, B., & Golden, B. B. (2018) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.73.5.593 · Cited by 40
Drivers of collective action and role of conflict in Kenyan fisheries co-management
Murunga, M., Partelow, S., & Breckwoldt, A. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105413 · Cited by 41
Wang, B., Hua, L., Mei, H., Wu, X., Kang, Y., & Zhao, N. (2024) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10072-z · Cited by 52
Chen, V. Z., & Hitt, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492619862051 · Cited by 44
Gómez, A. U., & Hugo Cadenas, R. (2015) · L’Ordinaire des Amériques · doi:10.4000/orda.1774 · Cited by 59
The International Dimension of the EU Emissions Trading System: Bringing the Pieces Together
Verde, S. F., & Borghesi, S. (2022) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-022-00705-x · Cited by 50
Wade, R., & Ellis, G. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15103744 · Cited by 37
Soubeyrand, S., Estoup, A., Cruaud, A., Malembic-Maher, S., Meynard, C. N., Ravigné, V., Barbier, M., Barrès, B., Berthier, K., Boitard, S., et al. (2024) · CABI Agriculture and Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s43170-024-00273-8 · Cited by 51
Fu, Y., & Ma, W. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12020617 · Cited by 37
Fink, L., Shao, J., Lichtenstein, Y., & Haefliger, S. (2020) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/0268396220936705 · Cited by 36
Environmental conflict management: a comparative cross-cultural perspective of China and Russia
Демчук, А. Л., Mišić, M., Obydenkova, A., & Tosun, J. (2021) · Post-Communist Economies · doi:10.1080/14631377.2021.1943915 · Cited by 41
“Moreover, provision and resource exploitation should be adapted to local natural conditions, with an established system for sanctions as well as rules of renegotiation (Ostrom, 2015).”
Discursive framing and organizational venues: mechanisms of artificial intelligence policy adoption
af Malmborg, F., & Trondal, J. (2021) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/00208523211007533 · Cited by 37
Bennett, M., March, A., & Failler, P. (2024) · Fishes · doi:10.3390/fishes9080305 · Cited by 36
Collective Action Problem in Heterogeneous Groups with Punishment and Foresight
Perry, L., Shrestha, M. D., Vose, M. D., & Sergey Gavrilets, B. (2018) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-018-2012-2 · Cited by 33
Anastasiu, I. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_13 · Cited by 45
“With the increase of prominence of the commons (Ostrom 2015; Cox 1985; Feeny et al. 1990), open licensing models, open source software as well as open standards, data and interfaces, we observe a current that embraces the so-called hacker ethic, a set of moral values and the philosophy of…”
BackgroundThe Role of Community Champions in Long-Term Sustainable Urban Water Planning
Lindsay, J., Rogers, B., Church, E., et al. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w11030476 · Cited by 36
Conceptual controversies at the boundaries between markets: the case of ridesharing
Chimenti, G. (2019) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2019.1657100 · Cited by 36
Gills, B. K., & Hosseini, S. A. H. (2022) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-022-01129-8 · Cited by 35
La gestion en commun des ressources naturelles : une perspective critique
Ballet, J. J. (2013) · Développement durable et territoires · doi:10.4000/developpementdurable.3961 · Cited by 40
Extrinsic rewards and crowding-out of prosocial behaviour
Wollbrant, C., Knutsson, M., & Martinsson, P. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01293-y · Cited by 39
Governing Collaborative Project Delivery as a Common-Pool Resource Scenario
Hall, D., & Bonanomi, M. M. M. (2021) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/8756972820982442 · Cited by 37
Institutions and their strength
Hindriks, F. (2021) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267121000195 · Cited by 34
Power from Below in Premodern Societies
Fontijn, D. R., Thurston, T. L., & Fernández-Götz, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009042826 · Cited by 34
Data spaces as meta-organisations
Guggenberger, T. M., Langdon, C. S., & Otto, B. (2025) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2025.2451250 · Cited by 38
Value Creation and Cognitive Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges
Mele, C., Spena, T. R., & Peschiera, S. (2018) · Journal of Creating Value · doi:10.1177/2394964318809152 · Cited by 32
Economic burden of livestock disease and drought in Northern Tanzania
Haseeb, A., Jonathan, Y., William, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics · doi:10.5897/jdae2018.1028 · Cited by 33
Transforming construction: the multi-scale challenges of changing and innovating in construction
Glass, J., Bygballe, L. E., & Hall, D. (2022) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2022.2141432 · Cited by 32
Boda, C. S., & Faran, T. S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103805 · Cited by 32
Can industries be parties in collective action? Community energy in an Iranian industrial zone
Eslamizadeh, S., Ghorbani, A., Künneke, R., & Weijnen, M. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101763 · Cited by 33
Climate Justice in an Intergenerational Sustainability Framework: A Stochastic OLG Model
Cisco, G., & Gatto, A. (2021) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies9020047 · Cited by 32
Torres-Pruñonosa, J., Plaza-Navas, M. À., Diéz‐Martín, F., & Román, C. P. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.629951 · Cited by 32
“Savings banks seem to be a case of auto-regulation in the governance of the common pool resources (Ostrom et al., 1999; Ostrom, 2015).”
BackgroundQuels curricula d’éducation au politique dans les questions environnementales et de développement ?
Barthes, A. (2022) · Éducation et socialisation · doi:10.4000/edso.18744 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostrom, E.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2015-09-23
- OpenAlex
- W4253773297
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 127 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 52.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- commons governance, common-pool resources, tragedy of the commons, institutional analysis, state control of natural resources, privatization, voluntary organizations, meadows, forests, irrigation communities, water rights, fisheries, natural resource policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review