Cited by 34African Studies and GeopoliticsColonialism, slavery, and tradeAfrican history and culture studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Slavery in Islamic Africa, 1400–1800

Ware, Rudolph T.·2011·The Cambridge World History of Slavery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Between the beginning of the fifteenth century and the end of the eighteenth, millions lived and died as slaves in African Muslim societies. From the Mediterranean coast to the grasslands of West Africa, in the Nile Valley and the Horn, and all along the Indian Ocean littoral, Muslims predominated or exercised great influence. In all these regions slavery was economically, socially, and politically important, and its scale increased throughout our period before reaching wholly unprecedented levels in the nineteenth century. Islamic principles and practices shaped the nature of slavery in Muslim societies, but they did so in uneven and contingent ways. In this chapter, we will examine the ways in which Islamic ideas about slavery were negotiated in the historical experience of Muslim Africans. There are three major components of any system of slavery: reduction of human beings to servitude, distribution of the enslaved within and between societies, and the nature of servitude within a society. These categories are utilitarian, not absolute. Biological reproduction of slaves belongs in categories one and three. Category three implies the continuous reproduction of the meanings of category one without the initial act of capture or birth. Examples could be multiplied. The categories are heuristic aids, not precise hermeneutical tools. In these sections we will survey Islamic legal, intellectual, and moral discourses on slavery in relation to the historical record. This initial discussion will treat themes common to all of Islamic Africa, providing a necessary context.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/chol9780521840682.005

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Jwaideh, 1989, Economics of Indian Ocean Slave Trade
  2. 1988, The Nineteenth Century Islamic Slave Trade from East Africa (Swahili and Red Sea Coasts): An Intermediate Census, Slavery and Abolition, 9
  3. Harris, 1971, The African Presence in Asia: Consequences of the East African Slave Trade
  4. Austen, 1979, The Uncommon Market: Essays in the Economic History of the Atlantic Slave Trade
  5. O'Fahey, 1971, Sudan in Africa
  6. 1979, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Ethiopian Studies

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ware, R. T.
Venue
The Cambridge World History of Slavery
Published
2011-07-25
Pages
47-80
OpenAlex
W2488472994
Cited by
34
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.46
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African Studies and Geopolitics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
Keywords
slavery, Islamic Africa, Islamic law, Islamic legal discourse, Islamic intellectual history, slave reproduction, slave trade, Indian Ocean trade, West Africa, Horn of Africa, Nile Valley

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review