Cited by 48Smart Cities and Technologies3D Modeling in Geospatial ApplicationsE-Government and Public Services

The conundrum in smart city governance: Interoperability and compatibility in an ever-growing ecosystem of digital twins

Open access
Quek, Hou Yee, Sielker, Franziska, Akroyd, Jethro, Bhave, Amit N, von Richthofen, Aurel, Herthogs, Pieter, Yamu, Claudia van der Laag, Wan, Li +5 more·2023·Data & Policy

Abstract

Abstract Today, technological developments are ever-growing yet fragmented. Alongside inconsistent digital approaches and attitudes across city administrations, such developments have made it difficult to reap the benefits of city digital twins. Bringing together experiences from five research projects, this paper discusses these digital twins based on two digital integration methodologies—systems and semantic integration. We revisit the nature of the underlying technologies, and their implications for interoperability and compatibility in the context of planning processes and smart urbanism. Semantic approaches present a new opportunity for bidirectional data flows that can inform both governance processes and technological systems to co-create, cross-pollinate, and support optimal outcomes. Building on this opportunity, we suggest that considering the technological dimension as a new addition to the trifecta of economic, environmental, and social sustainability goals that guide planning processes, can aid governments to address this conundrum of fragmentation, interoperability, and compatibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/dap.2023.1

Cites

58 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The application of semantic technology in smart city innovations confirms its suitability for dealing with interoperability issues and the modelling/annotation of sensor readings.

    “Furthermore, the outstanding success of the application of semantic technology in the context of smart city innovations confirms its suitability for dealing with interoperability issues [23][24][25] and the modelling/annotation [26,27] of sensor readings.”

    From Semantic-Driven Approach for Validation of IoT Streaming Data in Trustable Smart City Decision-Making and Monitoring Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    Section 2.2 describes semantic technologies as suitable candidates for addressing interoperability issues in smart cities. But section 3.2 calls the example digital twin largely experimental, so the paper does not establish the “outstanding success” claimed. The sensor-reading clause has separate citations [26,27] and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Batty M (2018) Digital Twins, Vol. 45. London, England: SAGE Publications Sage UK.
  2. Boschert S, Heinrich C and Rosen R (2018) Next generation digital twin. In Proceedings of TMCE 2018, 7-11 May, 2018. Las Palmas de Gran Canari, Spain.
  3. Chadzynski A, Li S, Grišiute A, Chua J, Yan J, Tai HY, Lloyd E, Agarwal M, Akroyd J, Herthogs P and Kraft M (2022a) Semantic 3d city interfaces-Intelligent interactions on dynamic geospatial knowledge graphs. Technical Report 297, c4e-Preprint Series. Cambridge.
  4. Hou Yee Quek et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press
  5. Grisiute A, Shi Z, Chadzynski A, Silvennoinen H, Richthofen Av and Herthogs P (2022) Automated semantic swot analysis for city planning targets: Data-driven solar energy potential evaluations for building plots in Singapore. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (Caadria 2022), Vol. 1, pp. 555-565.
  6. Mora L and Deakin M (2019) Untangling Smart Cities: From Utopian Dreams to Innovation Systems for a Technology-Enabled Urban Sustainability. New York, NY: Elsevier.
  7. West G (2017) Scale: The Universal Laws of Life and Death in Organisms, Cities and Companies, Vol. 2017. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quek, H. Y., Sielker, F., Akroyd, J., Bhave, A. N., von Richthofen, A., Herthogs, P., Yamu, C. V. D. L., Wan, L., Nochta, T., Burgess, G., Lim, M. Q., Mosbach, S., & Kraft, M.
Affiliations
  • The Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education in Singapore (SG)
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • CMCL Innovations (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Singapore-ETH Centre (SG)
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Sielker, Franziska
Venue
Data & Policy
Published
2023
Volume
5
ISSN
2632-3249 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322709930
Cited by
48
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Data & Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • National Research Foundation
  • Singapore-ETH Centre
  • Ove Arup Foundation
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Innovate UK
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
Keywords
smart city governance, digital twin, interoperability, compatibility, semantic integration, system integration, urban planning, smart urbanism, bidirectional data flow, sustainability goals, municipal government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review