Cited by 211Smart Cities and TechnologiesUrban Planning and GovernanceSustainable Urban and Rural Development

The making of smart cities: Are Songdo, Masdar, Amsterdam, San Francisco and Brisbane the best we could build?

Open access
Yigitcanlar, Tan, Han, Hoon, Kamruzzaman, Md., Ioppolo, Giuseppe, Sabatini-Marques, Jamile·2019·Land Use Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104187

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In order to create cities that are smart and sustainable, we actually need a balanced view on the community, technology, and policy trio as the driver of transformation.

    “The framework underlines that, despite the prevalent technocentric perspective in the making of smart cities, in order to create cities that are smart and sustainable, we actually need a balanced view on the community, technology, and policy trio as the driver of transformation.”
  • Technology will only lead to sustainability if its adequateness is thoroughly scrutinized via community engagement, and its implementation is carried out via a sound policy and government monitoring.

    “In other words, technology will only lead to sustainability if its adequateness is thoroughly scrutinized via community engagement, and its implementation is carried out via a sound policy and government monitoring [79].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yigitcanlar, T., Han, H., Kamruzzaman, M., Ioppolo, G., & Sabatini-Marques, J.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Messina (IT)
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
88
Pages
104187
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971649529
Cited by
211
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 1
FWCI
19.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
Keywords
smart cities, urban transformation, urban sustainability, livability, urban prosperity, smart urbanism, urban resilience, climate crisis, Songdo, Masdar City, Amsterdam, San Francisco, Brisbane, urban policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review