Cited by 31Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessMobile Health and mHealth Applications

A community health volunteer delivered problem-solving therapy mobile application based on the Friendship Bench ‘Inuka Coaching’ in Kenya: A pilot cohort study

Open access
Doukani, Asmae, van Dalen, Robin, Valev, Hristo, Njenga, Annie, Sera, Francesco, Chibanda, Dixon·2021·Global Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the largest care gap for common mental disorders (CMDs) globally, heralding the use of cost-cutting approaches such as task-shifting and digital technologies as viable approaches for expanding the mental health workforce. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a problem-solving therapy (PST) intervention that is delivered by community health volunteers (CHVs) through a mobile application called ‘Inuka coaching’ in Kenya. Methods: A pilot prospective cohort study recruited participants from 18 health centres in Kenya. People who self-screened were eligible if they scored 8 or higher on the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20), were aged 18 years or older, conversant in written and spoken English, and familiar with the use of smart mobile devices. The intervention consisted of four PST mobile application chat-sessions delivered by CHVs. CMD measures were administered at baseline, 4-weeks (post-treatment), and at 3-months follow-up assessment. Results: In all, 80 participants consented to the study, of which 60 participants (female, n = 38; male, n = 22) completed their 4-week assessments, and 52 participants completed their 3-month follow-up assessment. The results showed a significant improvement over time on the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20). Higher-range income, not reporting suicidal ideation, being aged over 30 years, and being male were associated with higher CMD symptom reduction. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this report is the first to pilot a PST intervention that is delivered by CHVs through a locally developed mobile application in Kenya, to which clinically meaningful improvements were found. However, a randomised-controlled trial is required to robustly evaluate this intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/gmh.2021.3

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Holding training in a health center allowed for easier interaction and troubleshooting while participants used the application.

    “Doukani et al. (41) however, mentioned the importance of holding the training in a health center as it allowed for easier interaction and troubleshooting while the participants used the application.”

    From Digital Solutions for Community and Primary Health Workers: Lessons From Implementations in Africa (2022) · cites this paper as Doukani et al. (41)

    The Methods (Inuka coaching) say that holding intervention sessions at the health centre enabled participants to get help using the app and resolving technical issues. The cited passage describes intervention sessions, not training held at the health centre; it also does not specifically describe easier interaction. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Abaza H and Marschollek M (2017) Mhealth application areas and technology combinations: a comparison of literature from high and low/middle income countries. Methods of Information in Medicine 56, Issue MethodsOpen, e105– e122. 28925418 PMC6291822
  2. Amati F, Banks C, Greenfield G and Green J (2017) Predictors of outcomes for patients with common mental health disorders receiving psychological therapies in community settings: a systematic review. Journal of Public Health 40, 375– 387. 29253218
  3. Andersson G and Titov N (2014) Advantages and limitations of internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry 13, 4– 11. 24497236 PMC3918007
  4. Arjadi R, Nauta MH, Scholte WF, Hollon SD, Chowdhary N, Suryani AO, Uiterwaal CSPM and Bockting CLH (2018) Internet-based behavioural activation with lay counsellor support versus online minimal psychoeducation without support for treatment of depression: a randomised controlled trial in Indonesia. The Lancet Psychiatry 5, 707– 716. 30006262
  5. Becker AE and Kleinman A (2013) Mental health and the global agenda. New England Journal of Medicine 369, 66– 73. 23822778
  6. Büscher R, Torok M, Terhorst Y and Sander L (2020) Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy to reduce suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open 3, e203933. 32343354 PMC7189224
  7. Chibanda D, Weiss HA, Verhey R, Simms V, Munjoma R, Rusakaniko S, Chingono A, Munetsi E, Bere T, Manda E, Abas M and Araya R (2016) Effect of a primary care–based psychological intervention on symptoms of common mental disorders in Zimbabwe. JAMA 316, 2618. 28027368
  8. Dhadphale M, Ellison RH and Griffin L (1983) The frequency of psychiatric disorders among patients attending semi-urban and rural general out-patient clinics in Kenya. British Journal of Psychiatry 142, 379– 383. 6850176
  9. Forkmann T, Gauggel S, Spangenberg L, Brähler E and Glaesmer H (2013) Dimensional assessment of depressive severity in the elderly general population: psychometric evaluation of the PHQ-9 using Rasch analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 148, 323– 330. 23411025
  10. Hampshire K, Porter G, Owusu SA, Mariwah S, Abane A, Robson E, Munthali A, DeLannoy A, Bango A, Gunguluza N and Milner J (2015) Informal m-health: how are young people using mobile phones to bridge healthcare gaps in Sub-Saharan Africa? Social Science and Medicine 142, 90– 99. 26298645
  11. Lund C. (2012) Poverty and mental health: a review of practice and policies. Neuropsychiatry 2, 213– 219.
  12. Maselko J (2017) Social epidemiology and global mental health: expanding the evidence from high-income to low- and middle-income countries. Current Epidemiology Reports 4, 166– 173. 28680795 PMC5488107
  13. Monahan PO, Shacham E, Reece M, Kroenke K, Ong'Or WO, Omollo O, Yebei VN and Ojwang C (2009) Validity/reliability of PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 depression scales among adults living with HIV/AIDS in Western Kenya. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24, 189– 197. 19031037 PMC2629000
  14. Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Araya R, Marsch LA, Unützer J, Patel V and Bartels SJ (2017) Digital technology for treating and preventing mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries: a narrative review of the literature. The Lancet. Psychiatry 4, 486– 500. 28433615 PMC5523650
  15. Naslund JA, Shidhaye R and Patel V (2019) Digital technology for building capacity of nonspecialist health workers for task sharing and scaling up mental health care globally. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 27, 181– 192. 30958400 PMC6517068
  16. Ndetei DM, Ongetcha FA, Mutiso V, Kuria M, Khasakhala LA and Kokonya DA (2007) The challenges of human resources in mental health in Kenya. African Journal of Psychiatry 10, 33– 36.
  17. Patel V, Saxena S, De Silva M and Samele C (2013) Transforming lives, enhancing communities: innovations in mental health. In Report of the Mental Health Working Group. Available at https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/institute-of-global-health-innovation/public/WISH_Mental_Health_Report.pdf. 24428425
  18. Shah PB (2011) Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal de l'Association Medicale Canadienne 183, 696; author reply 696. PMC3071397 21464181
  19. Sijbrandij M, Bryant RA, Schafer A, Dawson KS, Anjuri D, Ndogoni L, Ulate J, Hamdani SU and van Ommeren M (2016) Problem management Plus (PM+) in the treatment of common mental disorders in women affected by gender-based violence and urban adversity in Kenya; study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 10, 44. 27252778 PMC4888633
  20. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW and Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine 166, 1092– 1097. 16717171
  21. van Ginneken N, Tharyan P, Lewin S, Rao GN, Meera S, Pian J, Chandrashekar S and Patel V (2013) Non-specialist health worker interventions for the care of mental, neurological and substance-abuse disorders in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11, CD009149. 24249541
  22. von Brachel R, Teismann T, Feider L and Margraf J (2019) Suicide ideation as a predictor of treatment outcomes in cognitive-behavioral therapy for unipolar mood disorders. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 19, 80– 84. 30619501 PMC6300714
  23. Walker ER, McGee RE and Druss BG (2015) Mortality in mental disorders and global disease burden implications. JAMA Psychiatry 72, 334. 25671328 PMC4461039

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doukani, A., van Dalen, R., Valev, H., Njenga, A., Sera, F., & Chibanda, D.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Philips (Netherlands) (NL)
  • University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Doukani, Asmae
Venue
Global Mental Health
Published
2021
Volume
8
Pages
e9-e9
ISSN
2054-4251 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133802444
Cited by
31
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Grand Challenges Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
problem-solving therapy, community health volunteers, mobile application, Friendship Bench, task shifting, common mental disorders, mental health professionals, Kenya, predictors of treatment response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review