Cited by 7Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesPsychology and Mental Health

The bolstering effect of conceptual priming on psychological help-seeking attitudes in men

Open access
Yousaf, Omar, Popat, Aneka·2015·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is a well-established finding that men are often unwilling to engage with mental health services, and that they hold negative attitudes toward psychological help-seeking. Consequently, men's psychological problems often remain untreated, which in turn can compromise their quality of life. AIMS: The present experiment addresses this problem using a conceptual priming paradigm from social psychology called Scrambled Sentence Test as an intervention to change men's negative attitudes toward psychological help-seeking. METHOD: The Scrambled Sentence Test works by asking participants to unscramble sentences that unbeknownst to them include priming words--in this case, openness and communication-related words. Sixty-nine men completed the task (with priming or control words) under the instructions of a condition-blind experimenter. RESULTS: The primed group showed more positive attitudes (Mdn = 56.5) toward seeking psychological help compared to controls (Mdn = 40.0), p < 0.01; r = 0.38. CONCLUSION: The findings are the first to suggest that conceptual priming of this kind can be used an as effective and time-efficient intervention by mental health professionals to encourage men to seek help for psychological problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638237.2014.998808

Cites

31 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yousaf, O., & Popat, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Yousaf, Omar
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2015-02-02
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
347-350
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W1973182223
Cited by
7
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Space (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
conceptual priming, mental health help-seeking, help-seeking attitudes, men, mental health service utilization, openness, communication
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review