Cited by 1,313Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotic Use and ResistanceInfection Control in Healthcare

Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011–2014.

Open access
Weiner, Lindsey M., Webb, Amy K., Limbago, Brandi, Dudeck, Margaret A., Patel, Jean, Kallen, Alexander J., Edwards, Jonathan R., Sievert, Dawn M.·2016·Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe antimicrobial resistance patterns for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) that occurred in 2011–2014 and were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Network. METHODS: Data from central line–associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, ventilator-associated pneumonias, and surgical site infections were analyzed. These HAIs were reported from acute care hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals, and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Pooled mean proportions of pathogens that tested resistant (or nonsusceptible) to selected antimicrobials were calculated by year and HAI type. RESULTS: Overall, 4,515 hospitals reported that at least 1 HAI occurred in 2011–2014. There were 408,151 pathogens from 365,490 HAIs reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, most of which were reported from acute care hospitals with greater than 200 beds. Fifteen pathogen groups accounted for 87% of reported pathogens; the most common included Escherichia coli (15%), Staphylococcus aureus (12%), Klebsiella species (8%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (8%). In general, the proportion of isolates with common resistance phenotypes was higher among device-associated HAIs compared with surgical site infections. Although the percent resistance for most phenotypes was similar to earlier reports, an increase in the magnitude of the resistance percentages among E. coli pathogens was noted, especially related to fluoroquinolone resistance. CONCLUSION: This report represents a national summary of antimicrobial resistance among select HAIs and phenotypes. The distribution of frequent pathogens and some resistance patterns appear to have changed from 2009–2010, highlighting the need for continual, careful monitoring of these data across the spectrum of HAI types. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1–14

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/ice.2016.174

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Candida species are a leading cause of health care-associated bloodstream infections in the United States and elsewhere.

    “In the United States and elsewhere, Candida species are a leading cause of health care–associated bloodstream infections (3–5).”

    From Population-Based Active Surveillance for Culture-Confirmed Candidemia — Four Sites, United States, 2012–2016 (2019) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results (Pathogen Distribution; page not provided) say that Candida species, grouped together, would rank fourth among pathogens across all healthcare-associated infection types in the U.S. The passage does not establish Candida’s rank specifically among bloodstream infections, and the paper’s data do not cover countries outside the U.S. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 24th informational supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2014: M100– S24.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiner, L. M., Webb, A. K., Limbago, B., Dudeck, M. A., Patel, J., Kallen, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Sievert, D. M.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Weiner, Lindsey M.
Venue
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Published
2016-08-30
Volume
37
Issue
11
Pages
1288-1301
ISSN
  • 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-6834
OpenAlex
W4230357700
Cited by
1,313
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 169 · 2019: 183 · 2018: 120 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
61.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, nosocomial infections, National Healthcare Safety Network, central line-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, ventilator-associated pneumonia, surgical site infection, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella, coagulase-negative staphylococci, fluoroquinolone resistance, device-related infection, resistance monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review